In the bill, big box retailers are defined as having at least 75,000 square footage and $1 billion or more in corporate sales. The bill would have required a “livable wage” as well as benefits be provided for by the retailers. It also had an exemption for employers that collectively bargain with their employees. It also gave retailers four years to comply if it were to become law. The increase would have been 50 percent higher than the current $8.25 minimum wage inside the district.
The bill would raise the annual earnings of a full-time employee making the lowest legally permissible wage from about $17,000 to $26,000.
Also known as the Large Retailer Accountability Act, has created controversy with local leaders and started a new discussion on the low wages that many retailers pay their employees while benefiting from massive profits.
“The coalition of labor unions, city clergy and progressive political activists backing the bill have over the past six weeks canvassed neighborhoods and held media events in hopes of pressuring Gray into signing the bill. Walmart and other large retailers, they argued, could pay their workers better wages without significantly harming their bottom lines.”
The announcement of the veto came in a letter to D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson. It was delivered on Thursday morning, and explained his opposition to the bill. He also stated that he wanted to “reasonable increase” in the minimum wage for all employees, and not just retailers.
In the letter, Gray said the bill was “not a true living-wage bill, because it would raise the minimum wage only for a small fraction of the District’s workforce.” He added the bill is a “job-killer,” citing threats from Walmart and other retailers that they will not locate to the city if the bill becomes law.
Mayor Gray went on to say, “If I were to sign this bill in to law, it would do nothing but hinder our ability to create jobs, drive away retailers, and set back on the path to prosperity for all.”
He also said, “While the intentions of its supporters were good, this bill is simply a woefully inadequate and flawed vehicle for achieving the goal we all share.”
After the bill passed, Walmart threatened to drop the plans for three of its six stores, depending on what Mayor Gray decided to do. Walmart claimed that the new required minimum wage was simply too much.
Walmart spokesman Steven Restivo called the veto “good news for D.C. residents,” and that Mayor Gray chose, “jobs, economic development and common sense over special interests.”
Mr. Restivo went on to say that they would continue with their plans, stating “We look forward to finishing the work we started in the city almost three years ago.”
WalMart’s entry into the city was an early political coup for Gray, and he personally lobbied — some say threatened — top company executives to commit to a store at the Skyland Town Center development not far from Gray’s home in Ward 7.
All hope may not be lost for the bill, however. The D.C. Council has 30 days to take a vote to override the veto. An override would require 9 of the 13 members to vote in favor of an override. When the legislation originally passed the Council, it garnered 8 votes.
Mr. Mendelson told his colleagues a vote to override will take place on Tuesday, the Council’s first legislative meeting since the bills final passage in July.
If the council fails to override the veto, Restivo said, “all stores are back on.”
Here is a guy, in a hat, with animal ears, explaining the Mayor Gray veto.
When you block a person, they can no longer invite you to a private message or post to your profile wall. Replies and comments they make will be collapsed/hidden by default. Finally, you'll never receive email notifications about content they create or likes they designate for your content.
Note: if you proceed, you will no longer be following .