Skip to main content

Judge: No Audio Testimony in Zimmerman Trial

         
PHOTO: George Zimmerman listens as his defense counsel Mark O'Mara questions potential jurors for his trial in Seminole circuit court, June 20, 2013 in Sanford, Fla.         
 

 

 

 

The judge in the murder trial of George Zimmerman said Friday that prosecution audio experts who point to Trayvon Martin as screaming on a 911 calls moments before he was killed won't be allowed to testify at trial.

 

Judge Debra Nelson's written ruling was released Saturday. She had heard argument during a multiday hearing on whether to allow testimony from two prosecution experts.

 

One expert ruled out Zimmerman as the screamer and another said it was Martin.  A defense expert argued there was not enough audio to determine who the screams are coming from. Zimmerman's attorneys also argued that the state experts' analysis is flawed.

 

Opening statements are set for Monday in the second-degree murder trial for the former neighborhood watch volunteer who says he fired on the unarmed black teenager in self-defense last year. Zimmerman is pleading not guilty.

 

The screams are crucial pieces of evidence because they could determine who the aggressor was in the confrontation. Martin's family contends it was the teen screaming, while Zimmerman's father has said it was his son.

Audio experts from both sides testified at different times since the admissibility hearing started last month. Voice experts were hired by lawyers and news organizations to analyze the calls, which were made during the confrontation between the two. The experts arrived at mixed conclusions.

PHOTO: George Zimmerman listens as his defense counsel Mark O'Mara questions potential jurors for his trial in Seminole circuit court, June 20, 2013 in Sanford, Fla.
Gary W. Green/Getty Images
George Zimmerman listens as his defense... View Full Size
PHOTO: George Zimmerman listens as his defense counsel Mark O'Mara questions potential jurors for his trial in Seminole circuit court, June 20, 2013 in Sanford, Fla.
Gary W. Green/Getty Images
George Zimmerman listens as his defense counsel Mark O'Mara questions potential jurors for his trial in Seminole circuit court, June 20, 2013 in Sanford, Fla.
 
 

In deciding whether to admit the voice-recognition technology used by prosecution audio expert Tom Owen, Nelson had to determine whether it is too novel or whether it has been accepted by the scientific community at-large.

Owen was hired by the Orlando Sentinel last year to compare a voice sample of Zimmerman with screams for help captured on 911 calls made by neighbors. He said Zimmerman's voice doesn't match the screams. He only compared Zimmerman's voice to the 911 calls because he didn't have a voice sample for Martin at the time.

"The screams don't match at all," Owen testified during the hearing. "That's what tells me the screams aren't George Zimmerman."

Owen also testified that remarks Zimmerman made in a conversation with a police dispatcher aren't a racial slur. He testified Zimmerman said, "These f------ punks."

Expert Alan Reich testified in a report for prosecutors that the screams on the 911 tapes were from Martin and the defense does not want him to testify at trial.

Reich's analysis also picked up words that other experts couldn't find. They include the words, "This shall be" from Zimmerman and "I'm begging you" from Martin.

In contrast, a British audio expert testified for the defense that it would be extremely difficult to analyze voices by comparing screaming to a normal voice.

"I've never come across a case in my 13 years where anybody's tried to compare screaming to a normal voice," said audio expert Peter French.

A second audio expert for the defense, George Doddington, also criticized prosecution experts who said Friday that screams and pleas on a 911 recording likely belonged to Martin.

"It's all ridiculous," Doddington said.

———

Follow Kyle Hightower on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/khightower.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"I'm just trying to make a way out of no way, for my people" -Modejeska Monteith Simpkins

 

AFRICAN AMERICA IS AT WAR

THERE IS A RACE WAR ON AFRICAN AMERICA

THERE IS A RACE WAR ON AFRICAN AMERICANS

THERE IS A RACE WAR ON BLACK PEOPLE IN AMERICA

AMERICA'S RACISTS HAVE INFILTRATED AMERICAN POLICE FORCES TO WAGE A RACE WAR AGAINST BLACK PEOPLE IN AMERICA

THE BLACK RACE IS AT WAR

FIRST WORLD WAR:  THE APPROXIMATELY 6,000 YEAR WORLD WAR ON AFRICA AND THE BLACK RACE

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

This fat bastard was smiling in court when they announced the jury selection. All women nearly all white with the exception of one 'hispanic'. Now the state's evidence of audio evaluation is thrown out. Tell me again what exactly the state is doing to seriously prosecute this case?? Time to take it to the federal courts.

Originally Posted by Yemaya:

This fat bastard was smiling in court when they announced the jury selection. All women nearly all white with the exception of one 'hispanic'. Now the state's evidence of audio evaluation is thrown out. Tell me again what exactly the state is doing to seriously prosecute this case?? Time to take it to the federal courts.


I'd like to know just how that happened.  What is wrong with the Martin's attorney?  Each attorney gets the chance to accept or strike a potential juror during Voir dire.

sounds like grounds for an appeal.  I think they still have a great deal of strong evidence against GZ...like the fact that his Doctor didn't find head trauma the next day, a day which followed his refusal to go to the hospital the night of the shooting.  Also, there is fact that Trayvon didn't have any of GZ DNA on his hand or under his fingernails (this is not possible with the fight recap as told by GZ).  Another point of fact, Trayvon DNA or fingerprints are not on the gun.  GZ initially said that they wrestled over the gun when it went off...not true.  

 

 

As a side note, I actually want GZ to go free so that he can get shot like a rabid dog in the street by the community....F the Justice System....when you do a street crime, you need street justice!!!!

 

....i guess i'm still a little ghetto...please forgive me  

Originally Posted by sunnubian:
Originally Posted by Yemaya:

This fat bastard was smiling in court when they announced the jury selection. All women nearly all white with the exception of one 'hispanic'. Now the state's evidence of audio evaluation is thrown out. Tell me again what exactly the state is doing to seriously prosecute this case?? Time to take it to the federal courts.


I'd like to know just how that happened.  What is wrong with the Martin's attorney?  Each attorney gets the chance to accept or strike a potential juror during Voir dire.

Its not the Martin Family attorney that's involved, its Angela Corey the special prosecutor and her team that's doing all of this.  Speaking of, exactly where is Ms. Corey??

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×