The legacy of King has become so twisted that more white Republican conservatives spout "I Have Dream" and "We Must Be Judged, Not By The Color of Our Skin But, By The Content of Our Character" than socially conscious African Americans seeking to realize the achievement of King's "Promised Land." King "reasoning" has become King "rhetoric" as hostile forces use King's name, likeness, intellect and legacy to shift the social construct toward race neutrality and away from social justice. By using "King-isms" to deflect the same arguments for racial and social equality King made in his last two books, Why We Can't Wait and Where Do We Go from Here: Chaos or Community? (two books I read during every King week to not get caught up in all the "dream talk"), America was able to stop King's revolution of conscience right in its tracks. They took our focus off achieving equality, or reaching a "promised land," and put it on celebrating a holiday - in rhetorical ways that suggest that they too believe in King's "dream" of a colorblind society. Yet, colorblindness has become a barrier to discussion about what made the King phenomenon: racial inequality and social injustice. The desire to be a "colorblind society" called a halt to the discourse on race in America. Without being able to talk about race, you can't talk about racial disparities, thus you can't address racial inequities. But, we all profess to believe in the doctrine of King. Not really.
King is taken no more seriously in death than he was taken when he was alive. Even today, only half of America takes the day off for the King holiday - a truer testament to what they really believe, and a more telling insight to what African Americans let others believe about how King shook the foundations of race discourse in this nation. We've all, both Blacks and Whites (and everything in between) become consciously ignorant about the King legacy and what it stood for.
King spent the last years of his life, as did Malcolm, constructing an intellectual basis through which future generations would interpret his mission and his messages. He was not ignorant to the fact that if he, himself, did not craft the meaning of his life and his work, it would be left to historical revisionists to tell and it would be a whole lot different than he intended. Great men understand that they can never leave it to history to tell their story - that they must tell their own story. When you read the two aforementioned books, you quickly recognize what King was doing. Both books are rare, and extremely hard to find - even in reprint - but you can find all kind of "dream" books that romanticize both King and his message. King didn't talk about any dreams in the last years of his life. He talked about realities, and the principal question of equality and social justice ever coming about in America because of the ignorance of the (black and white) masses and the stupidity of the racially twisted ideas of supremacist ideology in circles of power throughout the institutions and social systems of America. He recognized the danger in trying to bring about a revolution of conscience in America, and resigned himself to America not getting where it needed to be, a land honoring the promise of equality, before they got to him. But he had enough faith to believe that we, as a people, would get there - with or without him - if we believed, and continued to be faithful in the struggle for equality. Instead, we settled for a holiday, and time has almost stood still.
When you stand for nothing, you'll fall for anything. There are no limits to the depths Black America has fallen, is falling, and will continue to fall, without the courage to fight for better than what America has given it. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. said it best,
- "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity."