quote:
Originally posted by Vox:
quote:
Originally posted by HonestBrother:
Both you and I may disagree with his value judgement ... but it is not obvious to me that he is being disingenuous.
As I said, it is possible that his views are idiosyncratic.
Nah, this is one of those things which, in the words of Justice Stewart, "I know it when I see it." Not the most sound piece of citable jurisprudence, but nevertheless a time-proven, urban-cultivated way to see through obvious bullshit.
But Vox,
You still haven't answered the POINT..
why is what some dude trying to do relevant???
see below:
--------------------------------
My Point:
Men should not sexually objectify women, it's degrading to women... and when done in a manner that dominates male conversation should be held as unacceptable among those who consider themselves "Intelligent"
Counterpoints presented to me:
1. Sexually objectifying women is a part of a man's nature
2. Stop looking at men sexually objectify women, it's rude..
3. You just mad cause the men you claim are sexually objectifying women are not sexually objecitfying you and want your "status" back..
4. If a guy agrees and tells you that women should not be sexually objectified then he is running game
5. I don't sexually objectify women, but I think men should have the right to sexually objectify women in private..
I guess I was thinking something along the lines of
1. Defining sexual objectification
2. Differentiating between sexual objectification and appreciation
3. Truthful admittance that the DEN doesn't have ONE thread sexually objectifying women but is DOMINATED by it
4. Or at least a reasonable answer why society benefits or should see sexual objectification as a good thing...