The Supreme Court rules that vouchers (where currently 95% of funds go to Catholic or other religious schools) are OK.
Huh?

Onward and Upward!
Replies sorted oldest to newest
quote:
Originally posted by MBM:
You can also make the argument that purpose and effect are significantly greater with vouchers. In the pledge, one could easily argue that simply uttering two words has very little direct connection to the instititutions and practice of religion. It has far less impact, for example, than the recognition of God on every piece of our currency_*_.
On the other hand, since, as CNN reports, almost all voucher dollars currently go to church or religous schools, without regard to intent, the transfer of public tax dollars to religous institutions has the direct effect of government subsidy/support.
quote:
Originally posted by MBM:
The Supreme Court will look at things like the phrase "In God We Trust" on our currency and rule that the recognition of God is not the same as the encouragement of a particular type of religion or belief. I'm guessing that this decision will be over-turned.
quote:
Originally posted by B Bankins:
I ... like the way Senate Chaplain Lloyd Ogilvie puts it....
"...We acknowledge the separation of sectarianism and state, but affirm the belief that there is no separation between God and state..."
Indeed there is not, and that was the Founding Fathers intent. This nation was founded "under God" and remains the moral compass that guides our principles.
quote:
I never imagined in my lifetime a ruling that declares the Pledge unconstitutional.
quote:
BB, the thing I can't get past is the fact that the constitution does not say anything about "separation of church ans state;" it says that there shall be no law "respecting an establishment of religion." The word "respecting" is important, because the 1st Amd. doesn't simply forbid a law proclaiming that a certain denomination shall be the official state religion. That's why it says, "no law respecting an establishment" rather than "no law establishing." One of the themes thruout the constitution is that they wanted safeguards against a movement toward authoritarianism. They must have known that is all you do is prohibit congress from passing a law declaring a state religion, that people bent on doing so could just pass laws encouraging or favoring a religion, or subtlely move toward encouraging a faith. That's exactly what the Knights of Columbus did when they petitioned Congress to add this new phrase, "under God" to the venerable Pledge in the 1950s. Belief in God is religious. it is the very dictionary definition of religion.
quote:
Originally posted by B Bankins:
I'm not a religious person, but I do understand the God concept behind the creation of this nation and the framing of the Constitution. God brings the needed moral, ethical, backing our nation functions under. Without it, the Constitution is just a collection of laws and nothing more. Without the God concept you and I would probably be doing shifts on some southern plantation-an embarrassment this nation will never recover from.
Embarrassment stems from morality ( else you wouldn't have so many "Johnsons" registered at weekend motels ), and our morality comes from a belief in God. Any God. Even Atheism is a form of religion.
quote:
Posted by Vox...
Do we need to believe in God in order to understand it? I see no reason why an atheist can't understand self-evident natural morality. But it just makes sense to me that there's a God. Especially if natural morality is his law (and God is recognized in almost all religions).
quote:
Originally posted by B Bankins:
Actually, once I stopped laughing, I kinda like the name. It has an aristocratic sense of high society associated with one who has wealth. I may use it on another forum-with your permission of course.![]()
quote:
Originally posted by B Bankins:
...when reaching adulthood,I saw the results of those who ignor the teachings of the Lord. Most of these people were miserable and hated life.
By contrast, those who worshipped God always seem to have a calm, inner peace, along with a joy and zest for living. I found that the more people accepted God, the better life seems for them. Of course, an Atheist can attain such inner peace and zest for life. They just don't associate God with their state of being. They must believe in something, however.
God is the best teacher of all when it comes to moral, ethical values. Just look at the decline of our culture today and it's hard to believe that late pop culture icons like Frank Senatra and Elvis Presley were considered in their time to be lewd and lascivious performers.
Again, I'm not a religious fanatic, but with the steady decline in basic human dignity, manners, and respect our kids are exposed to on a daily basis, to call the Pledge unconstitutional because of "under God" added, and say this is being forced on kids......
Sorry, but I'll never understand the thinking behind this kind of logic. Maybe their school day should begin with an episode of Ozzy Osbournes' family.![]()
![]()