St. Patrick, who was he really? Why would a man be canonized {declared to be a saint} just because he supposedly got rid of all the snakes in Ireland? Well check this! Most of you probably never heard of the "Twa". The Twa are a pygmy {small race of people} tribe from Africa that has a history that pre-dates the story of Adam & Eve by almost 8500 years. The Twa journeyed to Northern Ireland very early in it's conception prior to the influence of the Roman Catholic Church & had a cultural, technological, & philosophical impact on a people there known as the Druids. One of the cultural influences the Druids got from the Twa was the fact that they wore a fez or head cover that depicted the African symbol known is a Uraeus, which is the same snake image you see worn by the Kings & Queens in ancient Kemet {Egypt}. Now, the Roman Catholic Church seeing the practices of the Druids wanted to convert them, and if they couldn't, the would remove them & their beliefs as well along with the Twa who were still present in Northern Ireland at that time. This guy now known as ST PATRICK was given an order to set up Roman Catholic Churches all over Northern Ireland, and in the process, convert or remove the Druid & Twa influence. Guess which one Mr. Patrick carried out??????? He killed countless numbers of Druids & the Twa in the name of Father, the Son, & the Holy spirit. So when you hear people tell you that he was made a saint because he removed the snakes from Northern Ireland, it's really referring to the Uraeus head garment worn by the Druids & the Twa. And the leprechaun myth comes from the short Black men that were murdered all in the name of religion. THE CONQUEROR WILL NEVER TELL THE TRUE STORY! ONLY HIS/HER SIDE WILL BE TOLD! IT'S UP TO YOU TO FIND OUT FOR YOURSELF!
St. Patrick, who was he really? Why would a man be canonized {declared to be a saint} just because he supposedly got rid of all the snakes in Ireland? Well check this! 

Most of you probably never heard of the "Twa". The Twa are a pygmy {small race of people} tribe from Africa that has a history that pre-dates the story of Adam & Eve by almost 8500 years. The Twa journeyed to Northern Ireland very early in it's conception prior to the influence of the Roman Catholic Church & had a cultural, technological, & philosophical impact on a people there known as the Druids. One of the cultural influences the Druids got from the Twa was the fact that they wore a fez or head cover that depicted the African symbol known is a Uraeus, which is the same snake image you see worn by the Kings & Queens in ancient Kemet {Egypt}.

Now, the Roman Catholic Church seeing the practices of the Druids wanted to convert them, and if they couldn't, the would remove them & their beliefs as well along with the Twa who were still present in Northern Ireland at that time. This guy now known as ST PATRICK was given an order to set up Roman Catholic Churches all over Northern Ireland, and in the process, convert or remove the Druid & Twa influence. Guess which one Mr. Patrick carried out??????? He killed countless numbers of Druids & the Twa in the name of Father, the Son, & the Holy spirit.

So when you hear people tell you that he was made a saint because he removed the snakes from Northern Ireland, it's really referring to the Uraeus head garment worn by the Druids & the Twa. And the leprechaun myth comes from the short Black men that were murdered all in the name of religion. 

THE CONQUEROR WILL NEVER TELL THE TRUE STORY! ONLY HIS/HER SIDE WILL BE TOLD! IT'S UP TO YOU TO FIND OUT FOR YOURSELF!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"I'm just trying to make a way out of no way, for my people" -Modejeska Monteith Simpkins

 

AFRICAN AMERICA IS AT WAR

THERE IS A RACE WAR ON AFRICAN AMERICA

THERE IS A RACE WAR ON AFRICAN AMERICANS

THERE IS A RACE WAR ON BLACK PEOPLE IN AMERICA

AMERICA'S RACISTS HAVE INFILTRATED AMERICAN POLICE FORCES TO WAGE A RACE WAR AGAINST BLACK PEOPLE IN AMERICA

THE BLACK RACE IS AT WAR

FIRST WORLD WAR:  THE APPROXIMATELY 6,000 YEAR WORLD WAR ON AFRICA AND THE BLACK RACE

Original Post

THE CONQUEROR WILL NEVER TELL THE TRUE STORY! ONLY HIS/HER SIDE WILL BE TOLD! IT'S UP TO YOU TO FIND OUT FOR YOURSELF!

 

  Exactly.  As why I always say...don't believe me....look it up!

 

 when you hear people tell you that he was made a saint because he removed the snakes from Northern Ireland, it's really referring to the Uraeus head garment worn by the Druids & the Twa.

 

Makes sense to me since Ireland is typically toooooo cold for snakes. Snakes do not live in cold harsh weather. Most of them live in tropical or warm areas.  And Europe has experienced the Little Ice Age a couple of times-making the reasons for no snakes in certain location especially Ireland reasonable to understand. Or you can believe the myth that one man i.e. a human being had the ability to chase a snake,,,,let alone many snakes into the sea?  Now tell me.  Is that realistic?  Helllll nawl.  Cuz if so, we would use the same method to get rid of snakes today especially in the hills and mountainous areas where people live and work.  No?

 

And the leprechaun myth comes from the short Black men that were murdered all in the name of religion. 

 

Come on!  They enslaved PEOPLE in the name of religion.  Now which one are you gonna believe? The myth or the truth?   I think for the most part eradicating the pymies is more believable cuz that is the pattern of white people in an attempt to displace or remove black people wherever they are found.    And when you call a person a Black Irish you are not talking about color of hair and eyes.  You are specifically talking about genetic DNA.  Like they say..."a little truth always accompany a myth."  Which is designed by the conqueror or by a tribe, village, etc.  But the truth is what is reasonable that is most likely to occur.  But let's not FORGET that Europe fail victim to the wrath of the middle ages.  So who knows what the real truth is.  Apparently they don't.  Otherwise they wouldn't be trying to jam this bullshyte of St Patrick down our throat-and look...to celebrate they get DRUNK as a tribute?  Not buying it.  

 

See?  There is a lot of knowledge about the real truth regarding Africa and its people that Asia and Europe are not willing to talk about.  Cuz it shows them in a very vulnerable, savage, uncivilized light.  So as they always do....they switched the lies on to us.   So yes!  I believe that St. Patrick murdered most of the Twa tribe.  Absolutely.  Cuz why? That's what the white monsters have done to Africans in the last 1000 years or so.  But! .

Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say the author has a major axe to grind with the Roman Catholic Church, not limited to (his?) anachronistic use of "Roman Catholic Church." Patrick was enslaved by Irish pirates and the pious myth goes was moved to return there out of pity and love for them. That having been said, Of two writings we have preserved of his, one is his autobiographical piece and the other, Epistola Ad Milites Coroti, is an angry letter to a Welsh Christian ruler whose soldiers had massacred people that he converted. He denounces both militarism and violent religious coercion, saying that this Briton ruler's soldiers have "taken from him" people "whom [he] begot for God." So... yeah... that's why he's a saint. Not for driving the snakes out of Ireland. Author's a SHMORON.

 

OH... SORRY... also, Druid religion continued, though its violent cultic practices were rejected increasingly by an empowered nation. Christianity in Ireland flourished for cultural and socio-economic reasons, largely influenced by the flourishing monasteries that supported wide communities. Author should read a book.

I am the writer of the original dissertation about "THE NOT SO" Saint Patrick. It was taken from my Facebook page. And no, I don't have an ax to grind against the Catholic Church. It's about TRUTH and TRUTH ONLY. 
There is a quote that says "THE TRUTH PASSES THROUGH 3 STAGES: 1) IT IS RIDICULED, 2) IT IS VIOLENTLY OPPOSED, & 3) IT IS EVENTUALLY ACCEPTED AS SELF EVIDENT" I know there would be those who didn't like what I said, but when I person or people wake up from a long sleep, the light is somewhat of an annoyance & painful to the eyes. That's what the light of truth does. Some of us act like religion has never been used for subjugation, financial gain, or justification of violence as a means to advance authority over those not in line with the ordinances of the conquering, more dominant religious sect. Blue pill or Red pill please!!!!!! No offence, but when it comes to dropping jewels, "I NEED THE APPROVAL OF THOSE WHO DISLIKE THE WAY I DO SO ABOUT AS MUCH AS A LION NEEDS THE APPROVAL OF A LAMB"
With that being said here are the sources:
1) Hiddon Colors 1 & 2
2) The research & findings of Scottish historian David Mac Ritchie
3) The research & findings of Dr. Booker T Coleman
4) Dr. Ray Hagins research, findings, and lecture "IF CHRIST BE NOT RISEN"
5) Research & findings of Amen Par Ankh is a Sacred House of Life http://amen-parankh.blogspot.c...prechauns-black.html
6) Dr. Sharazada Ali lectures, research, & findings
7) the book entitled "They Cast No Shadows" by Brian Desborough
8) Godlike Productions
http://www.godlikeproductions....m1/message751640/pg1

I have other sources that I used also if this is not enough.

It's not strange or surprising that Actual Historian would refute the findings, after all he's trained, educated, & well versed in the perspective of the conqueror, not the "CONQUERED"
To him/her, George Washington was probably a great patriot, but ask the Slaves, Indians, and posterity of the countless British troops he murdered. As a matter of a fact, in some British history books, Ol George is classified as a terrorist. Amherst College/University is named after General Amherst, a hero according to American history, but vice versa to the Indians he gave blankets to laced with smallpox. These are facts! TRUTH! And truth is that which is consistent with reality.  

Originally Posted by William P:

It's not strange or surprising that Actual Historian would refute the findings, after all he's trained, educated, & well versed in the perspective of the conqueror, not the "CONQUERED"
To him/her, George Washington was probably a great patriot, but ask the Slaves, Indians, and posterity of the countless British troops he murdered. As a matter of a fact, in some British history books, Ol George is classified as a terrorist. Amherst College/University is named after General Amherst, a hero according to American history, but vice versa to the Indians he gave blankets to laced with smallpox. These are facts! TRUTH! And truth is that which is consistent with reality.  

Why should somebody just take your word for it? 

Originally Posted by nuggyt:
Originally Posted by William P:

It's not strange or surprising that Actual Historian would refute the findings, after all he's trained, educated, & well versed in the perspective of the conqueror, not the "CONQUERED"
To him/her, George Washington was probably a great patriot, but ask the Slaves, Indians, and posterity of the countless British troops he murdered. As a matter of a fact, in some British history books, Ol George is classified as a terrorist. Amherst College/University is named after General Amherst, a hero according to American history, but vice versa to the Indians he gave blankets to laced with smallpox. These are facts! TRUTH! And truth is that which is consistent with reality.  

Why should somebody just take your word for it? 

It's obvious that you didn't read all of my comments, otherwise you wouldn't have asked that null & void question. I presented the sources I used in my findings SIR NUGGYT in my first comments, and I also offered to provide more of my sources if what I already submitted wasn't enough. Go back and read for yourself. I present nothing without evidence or research to support it. In apologetics, facts are the only useful weapon because opinions are like ###holes.......everybody has one!

Originally Posted by William P:
Originally Posted by nuggyt:
Originally Posted by William P:

It's not strange or surprising that Actual Historian would refute the findings, after all he's trained, educated, & well versed in the perspective of the conqueror, not the "CONQUERED"
To him/her, George Washington was probably a great patriot, but ask the Slaves, Indians, and posterity of the countless British troops he murdered. As a matter of a fact, in some British history books, Ol George is classified as a terrorist. Amherst College/University is named after General Amherst, a hero according to American history, but vice versa to the Indians he gave blankets to laced with smallpox. These are facts! TRUTH! And truth is that which is consistent with reality.  

Why should somebody just take your word for it? 

It's obvious that you didn't read all of my comments, otherwise you wouldn't have asked that null & void question. I presented the sources I used in my findings SIR NUGGYT in my first comments, and I also offered to provide more of my sources if what I already submitted wasn't enough. Go back and read for yourself. I present nothing without evidence or research to support it. In apologetics, facts are the only useful weapon because opinions are like ###holes.......everybody has one!

Apologies, I was just responding to the last post.  Personally, I don't care enough about the topic to look into it any further.  

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×