1. Half the world "” nearly three billion people "” live on less than two dollars a day. source 1
2. The GDP (Gross Domestic Product) of the poorest 48 nations (i.e. a quarter of the world's countries) is less than the wealth of the world's three richest people combined. source 2
3. Nearly a billion people entered the 21st century unable to read a book or sign their names. source 3
4. Less than one per cent of what the world spent every year on weapons was needed to put every child into school by the year 2000 and yet it didn't happen. 4
5. 51 percent of the world's 100 hundred wealthiest bodies are corporations. source 5
6. The wealthiest nation on Earth has the widest gap between rich and poor of any industrialized nation. source 6
7. The poorer the country, the more likely it is that debt repayments are being extracted directly from people who neither contracted the loans nor received any of the money. source 7
8. 20% of the population in the developed nations, consume 86% of the world's goods. source 8
9. The top fifth of the world's people in the richest countries enjoy 82% of the expanding export trade and 68% of foreign direct investment "” the bottom fifth, barely more than 1%. source 9
10. In 1960, the 20% of the world's people in the richest countries had 30 times the income of the poorest 20% "” in 1997, 74 times as much. source 10
11. An analysis of long-term trends shows the distance between the richest and poorest countries was about:
* 3 to 1 in 1820
* 11 to 1 in 1913
* 35 to 1 in 1950
* 44 to 1 in 1973
* 72 to 1 in 1992 source 11
12. "The lives of 1.7 million children will be needlessly lost this year [2000] because world governments have failed to reduce poverty levels" source 12
13. The developing world now spends $13 on debt repayment for every $1 it receives in grants. source 13
14. A few hundred millionaires now own as much wealth as the world's poorest 2.5 billion people. source 14
15. "The 48 poorest countries account for less than 0.4 per cent of global exports." source 15
16. "The combined wealth of the world's 200 richest people hit $1 trillion in 1999; the combined incomes of the 582 million people living in the 43 least developed countries is $146 billion." source 16
17. "Of all human rights failures today, those in economic and social areas affect by far the larger number and are the most widespread across the world's nations and large numbers of people." source 17
18. "Approximately 790 million people in the developing world are still chronically undernourished, almost two-thirds of whom reside in Asia and the Pacific." source 18
19.

According to UNICEF, 30,000 children die each day due to poverty. And they "die quietly in some of the poorest villages on earth, far removed from the scrutiny and the conscience of the world. Being meek and weak in life makes these dying multitudes even more invisible in death."

That is about 210,000 children each week, or just under 11 million children under five years of age, each year. source 19
20. For economic growth and almost all of the other indicators, the last 20 years [of the current form of globalization, from 1980 - 2000] have shown a very clear decline in progress as compared with the previous two decades [1960 - 1980]. For each indicator, countries were divided into five roughly equal groups, according to what level the countries had achieved by the start of the period (1960 or 1980). Among the findings:
* Growth: The fall in economic growth rates was most pronounced and across the board for all groups or countries.
* Life Expectancy: Progress in life expectancy was also reduced for 4 out of the 5 groups of countries, with the exception of the highest group (life expectancy 69-76 years).
* Infant and Child Mortality: Progress in reducing infant mortality was also considerably slower during the period of globalization (1980-1998) than over the previous two decades.
* Education and literacy: Progress in education also slowed during the period of globalization.

source 20
21. "Today, across the world, 1.3 billion people live on less than one dollar a day; 3 billion live on under two dollars a day; 1.3 billion have no access to clean water; 3 billion have no access to sanitation; 2 billion have no access to electricity." source 21
22. The richest 50 million people in Europe and North America have the same income as 2.7 billion poor people. "The slice of the cake taken by 1% is the same size as that handed to the poorest 57%." source 22
23. The world's 497 billionaires in 2001 registered a combined wealth of $1.54 trillion, well over the combined gross national products of all the nations of sub-Saharan Africa ($929.3 billion) or those of the oil-rich regions of the Middle East and North Africa ($1.34 trillion). It is also greater than the combined incomes of the poorest half of humanity. source 23
24. A mere 12 percent of the world's population uses 85 percent of its water, and these 12 percent do not live in the Third World. source 24
25. Consider the global priorities in spending in 1998
Global priorities in spending in 1998Global Priority $U.S. Billions
Basic education for everyone in the world 6
Cosmetics in the United States 8
Water and sanitation for everyone in the world 9
Ice cream in Europe 11
Reproductive health for all women in the world 12
Perfumes in Europe and the United States 12
Basic health and nutrition for everyone in the world 13
Pet foods in Europe and the United States 17
Business entertainment in Japan 35
Cigarettes in Europe 50
Alcoholic drinks in Europe 105
Narcotics drugs in the world 400
Military spending in the world 780
source 25
26.

Number of children in the world
2.2 billion
Number in poverty
1 billion (every second child)
Shelter, safe water and health

For the 1.9 billion children from the developing world, there are:
* 640 million without adequate shelter (1 in 3)
* 400 million with no access to safe water (1 in 5)
* 270 million with no access to health services (1 in 7)
Children out of education worldwide
121 million
Survival for children

Worldwide,
* 10.6 million died in 2003 before they reached the age of 5 (same as children population in France, Germany, Greece and Italy)
* 1.4 million die each year from lack of access to safe drinking water and adequate sanitation
Health of children

Worldwide,
* 2.2 million children die each year because they are not immunized
* 15 million children orphaned due to HIV/AIDS (similar to the total children population in Germany or United Kingdom)

source 26
27.

The total wealth of the top 8.3 million people around the world "rose 8.2 percent to $30.8 trillion in 2004, giving them control of nearly a quarter of the world's financial assets."

In other words, about 0.13% of the world's population controlled 25% of the world's assets in 2004. source 27

Notes and Sources

1) This figure is based on purchasing power parity (PPP), which basically suggests that prices of goods in countries tend to equate under floating exchange rates and therefore people would be able to purchase the same quantity of goods in any country for a given sum of money. That is, the notion that a dollar should buy the same amount in all countries. Hence if a poor person in a poor country living on a dollar a day moved to the U.S. with no changes to their income, they would still be living on a dollar a day. In addition, see the following:

* Ignacio Ramonet, The politics of hunger, Le Monde diplomatique, November 1998
* The 9th International Anti-Corruption Conference Plenary Address by James Wolfensohn, August 2000
* March recognizes the billions living on less than two dollars a day, EarthTimes.org, October 24, 2000
* The poverty lines: population living with less than 2 dollars and less than 1 dollar a day from PovertyMap.net provides two maps showing the concentration of people living on less than 1 and 2 dollars per day, around the world.
* Also note that these numbers, from the World Bank, have been questioned and criticized.
o The World Bank has been criticized for almost arbitrarily coming up with a definition of a poverty line to mean one dollar per day (of which they say there are about 1.3 billion people). That figure and how it has been chosen has been much criticized by many, as shown by University of Ottawa Professor, Michel Chossudovsky in the previous link.
o In addition, in the United States for example, the poverty threshold for a family of four has been estimated to be around eleven dollars per day. The one dollar a day definition then misses out much of humanity to understand the impacts. Even the two dollars per day that I have pointed out here, while affecting half of humanity, also misses out the numbers under three or four, or eleven dollars per day. These statistics are harder to find, and as I come across them, I will post them here!
o More fundamental than that though, for example, is a critique from Columbia University, called How not to count the poor. The report describes an ill-defined poverty line, a misleading and inaccurate measure of purchasing power equivalence, and false precision as the three main errors that may lead to "a large understatement of the extent of global income poverty and to an incorrect inference that it has declined." (Emphasis added). This allows the World Bank to insist that the world is indeed "on the right track" in terms of poverty reduction strategy, attributing this "success" to the design and implementation of "good" or "better policies".
* But the statistic is not lost on some of the most prominent people in the world
o The New York Times in one of their email updates, in their Quote of the Day section, for July 18, 2001 provided the following quote: "A world where some live in comfort and plenty, while half of the human race lives on less than $2 a day, is neither just, nor stable." "” President Bush
o See also James Wolfenson, The Other Crisis, World Bank, October 1998 who said: "Today, across the world, 1.3 billion people live on less than one dollar a day; 3 billion live on under two dollars a day; 1.3 billion have no access to clean water; 3 billion have no access to sanitation; 2 billion have no access to electricity." (See also note 21 below.)
o Koffi Anan, UN Secretary General, in a speech on the International Day for the Eradication of Poverty, 17 October 2000, said "Almost half the world's population lives on less than two dollars a day, yet even this statistic fails to capture the humiliation, powerlessness and brutal hardship that is the daily lot of the world's poor."

link

© MBM

Original Post
Why that's just the result of the globalization of capitalistic tendencies. We should feel lucky to be in one of the biggest exporters of capitalism... and the rest of the world should feel lucky to have our form of capitalism exported to them.

Roll Eyes
quote:
Originally posted by Isome:
Why that's just the result of the globalization of capitalistic tendencies. We should feel lucky to be in one of the biggest exporters of capitalism... and the rest of the world should feel lucky to have our form of capitalism exported to them.

Roll Eyes


Isome, hold your tongue! Don't you dare put down our great nation! Why do you hate America so much? If you hate America and Americans so much, why don't you move to Cuba, North Korea or Vietnam with the rest of your "Socialist" Commie people! See how good the life is over there.

This country was founded on Capitalism, and anyone who says different is un-American. Socialism and Communism are dead. Capitalism is THE ONLY WAY. RESISTENCE IS FUTILE. You must join with us. You must serve our System......

[/Sarcasm]

lol

[Being Serious]

Well, that's what you get when you have a country with Neoconservative politics and Neoliberal international economics.
Unfortunately, these numbers and what they mean have become "normalized", in the sense put forward by Edward Herman in his book "Triumph of the Market". It can only be so, as capitalism panders to the uncontrolled greed and self-interest of the few. These statistics have to be accepted, normalized or else people would realize something is wrong and this is a threat to capitalist culture.

And there is a method to all this as well. One of the cornerstones is to promote the banality of evil. This is the function of capitalist leaders and intellectuals, as well as the media... to promote the acceptance of these numbers. Those that can't compete because of racial, cultural, or gender exclusion, because of emotional or physical handicaps, well, too bad... just accept it. They are the waste product, the litter of a capitalist economy.

Seldom in the mainstream media do you see an image of the corpse of a child who has died of starvation. On the Internet, yes, but on mainstream news sanitized for everyday consumption? Never! And this is no accident.

In 1971 Morley Safer, now with CBS 60 Minutes, along with a film crew from CBS News photographed a US soldier using a cigarette lighter to torch a Vietnamese village. The report and the film footage were broadcast worldwide and ruined the evening meal for many Americans. It caused CBS and Safer a lot of trouble and he has been trying to make-up for it ever since.

As a result of this incident, the US government exerted enormous pressure on the media to sanitize their reports and the results are with us today. Try finding an image of a dead American soldier, even on the Internet. Capital intensive warfare against mere gooks and Arabs means distancing the public from the slaughter. This is helpful in "normalizing" the unthinkable, the unspeakable. It has been "normalized" even here. Look at the number of responses to this topic.

The same applies to the casualties of capitalism. The dead, the dying, and the wounded are all around us. Just look in the streets, at our children, at the poor and impoverished. But the public is to be spared the sight of burning, starving, and decaying flesh. News of the crisis in Africa can be found on page three, while "Marriage Finds New Expression In The Gulf" is front page stuff. A nice trick. A human interest story that can be used to "normalize" the use of violence. "Honey, pass the bombs." But a real looming tragedy has been practically ignored and relegated to page three. No pictures, please!

You know those college professors in your Econ 101 classes who regurgitated the ideology of their corporate sponsors? You were young and naïve and anxious to learn and they told you that capitalism provided the greatest benefit for the greatest number of people? They lied.

Reference: Triumph of the Market by Edward Herman, Chapter 13: The Banality of Evil
Last edited {1}

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×