First - what is the point of characterizing someone as "promiscuous"? What purpose does it serve? How does it advance humanity in any meaningful way? How does it strengthen relationships between human beings? What's the point?
That is something for the topic starter to answer, don't you think? You should be directing that question to Popcorn. From the interest it has generated I would NOT be questioning the validity of the topic as the web-master if I were you.
I can hear Henry38 saying - "well, they ARE promiscuous". How does that differ from someone calling you a nigger? You say, well their behavior makes them promiscuous. They say, well your skin color makes you a nigger. Does that get us anywhere? Again, what's the point?
That is a pretty trivial silly comment. My skin color is what I am born with, it is not a lifestyle as promiscuity is. How can you come up with a comparison like that? It's like you are saying I am limited in my functions as a person because I am black. And that is a statement coming from a fellow black man? I am shocked. From your logic I can not say someone is a thief because if I do he would say I am a nigger. LOL. Wake-up one is a lifestyle that one can do make a conscious decision to stop or pursue whiles the other is genetic and one can not do anything about. The example is very silly indeed.
Back to the comment, "where does it get us?" I suggest you read the comments of the consequences of female promiscuity as opposed to male promiscuity. It looks like you conveniently ignored that or you would not be asking this question
More importantly - THERE WOULD BE NO "PROMISCUOUS" WOMEN IF MEN WEREN'T SLEEPING WITH THEM. It is the most ridiculous argument to me to malign women when the behavior you attack is wholly dependent upon their interaction with men.
I'll agree that there would not be promiscuous women if there were no men to sleep with them but then again it sounds like again you are missing the point altogether. It's like saying if there are no houses then there would be no burglars to rob them. So what, people should not build houses?
Men the world over are the same i.e. they are promiscuous, but when was the last time you heard women from Asia and Middle East labeled as promiscuous? If these women are seen as virtuous then from your logic the men from this part of the world do not sleep around. Pleeeaaase, you and I know better.
However that is beside the point. Again I would rather refer you back because you really need to understand the points made about responsibilities and consequences. Please understand no one is ignoring the role men play in this behavior. In fact if you checked my last post I said I have never come across any man that would defend male promiscuity. The point made in case you missed is that the damage these men do is limited. A promiscuous woman on the other hand is whole new ball game.
If I take a woman and educate her it is highly likely her children would follow her example and become highly educated people. That would create a strong and prosperous society.
If I take another woman and set her on a course of drug taking, thieving prostitution etc. What do you think are the chances her children achieving anything in life? More importantly do you think this woman would pass her depraved lifestyle to her children?
Please try and contrast the above carefully and understand the points made then you should see THE POINT of this conversation. Our women are the foundation on which our society is built, please try and understand that. Justifying or comparing women behavior to what their menfolk do is a wrong idea.