The two scenarios are hardly similar. There is not one iota of proof that a missile hit the plane or the Pentagon.
Jaysus!


quote:Originally posted by Frenchy:
Again, just because they can, doesn't mean they did.
quote:Originally posted by Frenchy:
In your case, the mountain of evidence and eyewitness accounts point to a missile. That is completely lacking in the Pentagon crash, and actually rebutted by the information that is available. It's not the same.
quote:Originally posted by MBM:
Frenchy - get help.![]()
Next you'll be telling me that we actually did walk on the moon.
![]()
quote:(P.S. I'm not sure why EP it says I edited your post. I didn't!)
quote:Originally posted by Frenchy:quote:(P.S. I'm not sure why EP it says I edited your post. I didn't!)
Heh. You're in the wrong thread to try to pass off that big fat lie. The proof is RIGHT THERE for us all to see!![]()
![]()
quote:Originally posted by AudioGuy:
in the lower right corner you see a wing... mostly in tact... unlike the pentagon post 9/11 photos.
The conspiracy theorist in me could not let this pass...
It could not have been any more grisly than showing the planes hit the towers a kazillion times or seeing people jumping their deaths (both of which I saw last week). What harm would there be in releasing the black box recording of some guys speaking arabic or farsi while flying the plane?quote:Originally posted by Frenchy:
... The government could release video footage and play the recordings from the Black Box and people would STILL think it was fake. I, for one, am glad they have not gone that grisly route...