quote:
Originally posted by ThaWatcher:
What does drinking alcohol or signing a multi-million dollar contract have to do with war?
Society is making a judgment about at what age our youth are mature enough to do things. I see an extraordinary double standard and logical inconsistency in saying that at 17 or 18 you are old enough to die for your country, yet you must be 20 to play basketball. It makes no logical sense.
quote:
Remember when Kellen Winslow Jr. made that statement about "I'm a soldier" and "this is war"?--what did that have to do with football?
That had nothing to do with age and everything to do with making an insensitive analogy during a time when people were sacrificing their lives in real war. The analogy actually works. We use it in sports and business every day. The context that the comment was made, however, rendered it inapropriate - IMO.
quote:
My point is this, most jobs that you sign up for in this country have some kind of requirement attached to them; for JO to say that this additional requirement is racist is foolish.
And it has been established that high schoolers can play in the NBA - at the highest levels. Why should the NBA prevent them, even if it is only one kid a year, from earning a living? Furthermore - JO's point is that withn the broader context of other professional leagues having no problem hiring high school athletes, that it raises questions about why the NBA is looking to do this. Furthermore, there is no question that the impact of this age limit will disproportionately harm young African American males. In that context, IMO, the impact of the ruling could be considered racist. In the one sport that has a higher concentration of black athletes, a rule will be created to limit the ability of some of those athletes to compete.
quote:
Now on the quality aspect. We probably can't narrow down the degeneration of the sport to one element. It's a combination of things. The atheletes are overpaid, under trained, and immature.
The athletes are overpaid? They couldn't be overpaid unless the owners were making the money to pay them. Are you concerned about the owners being overpaid?
Under-trained? Perhaps - but that seems to be the fault of coaches not the athletes.
Immature? Are you saying that
people now are more immature than
people were in the past? Why do you think that NBA players are more immature than they were?
quote:
It's crazy that an athelete can get a coach fired.
Why is that crazy? You don't think that Larry Bird could have gotten Bill Fitch fired? Who was more valuable to that team?
quote:
It's even more crazy that an athelete can sign a contract with a team, then turn around and demand a trade.
It happens every day. Something changes in a business relationship and contracts are renegotiated or severed. Why should athletes not have the same rights that everyone else has? Moreover, are you equally concerned that a team can sign a player to a contract and then turn around and trade him/her? What's the difference?
quote:
I think if the NBA got away from the "superstar" model and back to the "team" model the game would be much better.
But didn't the Pistons win a championship essentially with the team model. It must still be there. Also - was the NBA in the "superstar" model when Wilt averaged 50 a game in the late 1960's? It seems to me that teams take advantage of whatever talent they have. If you've got Larry and Kevin and Chief and DJ and Danny - then you use them. If, on the other hand, all you have is Bernard King - then you use him. Hasn't it always been that way?
quote:
But with all of these corporate sponsorships, sneaker contracts, and TV deals I don't see that happening anytime soon....
I know you're not suggesting that athletes - who make extraordinary amounts of money for others - shouldn't share in that windfall!!!
