Skip to main content

 

 
Bachmann Believes Black People Were Better Off During Slavery?
Michele Bachmann (Getty Images)

GOP presidential hopeful Michele Bachmann has signed a conservative pledge called "The Marriage Vow -- A Declaration of Dependence Upon Marriage and Family." It's not surprising that it's anti-abortion, anti-same sex marriage and anti-divorce. But one particular piece has everyone up in arms over the idea that she and other signatories think that black people were better off during slavery:

Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA's first African-American President.

 

Do Bachmann and others who signed the pledge actually think we were better off without freedom and with all of the other emotional and physical horrors that accompanied being enslaved? We don't know, quite honestly doubt they care, and don't believe that's actually the point (and the very accuracy of the statement -- including whether living arrangements during slavery are what we'd consider "two-parent households" -- is a whole different conversation). 

 

What's actually disturbing here is the total willingness to invoke slavery -- as well as the current state of the black family -- to serve as a cheap emotional hook to promote a conservative agenda that has nothing more to do with African Americans than it does with anyone else (not unlike the infamous "The most dangerous place for an African American is in the womb" billboards).

 

So while Bachmann and others who sign this pledge will score points with racists who like the dig at black people as well as conservatives who like the underlying political ideology of "The Marriage Vow," the rest of us should focus not so much on what they believe about the state of the African-American family but on what they're willing to say about it to serve their own political ambitions.

 

Read more at Jack and Jill Politics.

Original Post

Now, it's time for somebody to just put their foot in her ass.  

 

I am sick and tired of White people saying the most racist ignorant sh!t about Black people in this country and not being called on it.  And, f**k an apology----another thing that I am sick of hearing is racist and ignorant White people giving some fake disingenuous apology after they have expressed what racist Whites want to hear said about Black people in the first place.  

 

Hell, maybe her poor white trash ancestors were better off during slavery when they had to eek out a living working along side slaves as dirt poor share croppers because they couldn't get a descent job paying a descent wage because of slavery; maybe they were better off because in 1860 a poor white child was more likely to be raised by his mother and father because they were not on meth and were too busy working sun up to sun down just like the slaves as share croppers to create a meth lab in their homes.

What educational level was required to function successfully in society at the time?  White people did not start creating their educational system to mass produce workers until the 1880s.  There were no planes, automobiles, televisions or computers.

 

So just associating the difference in the times with slavery is NONSENSE.

 

Ever considered that White people conquered the world because most of them are so STUPID?

 

Dummies are necessary to go off to fight the wars to make a small percentage of people richer.  The dummies need to have their heads filled with nonsense to not serve their own interests.

 

http://psikeyhackr.livejournal.com/1276.html

 

Xum

Sista Yemaya wrote: Yes unfortunately, it is sad that there were more 2 parent households during slavery than today.

 

 

  Slavery was different.  In most cases, it was a FORCED union...and not a lot of women back then could CHOOSE the father of their babies...and most times massa had his "whatever" in the gene pool.  And let's not forget the fact that marriage or a union between slaves was incorporated through the sole permission of massa.  Or the father could be from another plantation entirely-which occurred often.  If one was lucky during that time to have a baby by a person LOVED...both had to real careful not to piss massa off otherwise he was KNOWN to separate them....or families by selling members off.  So the whole family dynamics since being in this country for blackfolks had been totally twisted, cruel and haphazard.  As a result many slaves had to wear the mask and fool massa each and everytime when it came to love and having a family by a person of choice.

 

 What does that say about our mindset of TODAY??? That just my baby daddy and just my baby mama thing gotta go.

 

To me it's the same dynamics except the union is consensual.  Marriages between slaves had to be approved by massa.  A lot of slaves did not get married cuz either it was not approved or if massa found out and didn't like the union, one of the parties was shipped/sold off to another plantation....caring less about splitting the family apart.  That's why blackfolks fought hard to stay together and told massa very little about their personal relationship for fear he would dismantle it.  So baby daddy/baby mama is just a new term for a very old [forced]traditional standard [implemented by massa] among a lotta blackfolks during slavery.  But I hear ya...my sista! 

 

In addition, during the post re-construction era[years after the freedom of slaves] many blackfolks married to legitimatize their union and children even though they were still deemed subhuman by America with no legal civil rights.  Having said that, although it has been a 360 degree turnaround in terms of how far we have come as a people, the plantation mindset in terms of having babies out of wedlock is STILL alive and well in these times....and the tragic thing is this generation just don't get how important marriage is for their children.   Fact is they are not thinking....just sexting....and allowing the chips [which are the children] to fall where they may...and in that behavior only, it is the most unfortunate set of circumstances to date....but it is what it is and I don't think it's gonna change anytime soon.  But!  I'm just sayin 

 

 

Sista Sunnubian wrote:  that I am sick of hearing is racist and ignorant White people giving some fake disingenuous apology after they have expressed what racist Whites want to hear said about Black people in the first place.

 

  You said it my sista....racist and ignorant.  And don't forget STUPID.  Cuz stupid is what they feel when they are not able to catch the words before leaving their mouths.  Cuz it's in their minds to say.  And sometimes they get carried away....and ooops their REAL perspectives come out.  And I think in this day and  age that it is absolutely FOOLISHLY inappropriate....if not ridiculous to spew racism and then try to undo it at the same time.  It is clear that this woman is NOT educated in history...and if she is, she has shown she lacks compassion, empathy and reason.  First, slaves were PEOPLE....humans and more than that ADVANCED humans who came forcibly to this land and created the most powerful, high-tech nation in the world...without their native tongue or so-called westernized education.  

 

The reason why she is able to have a vase selection of "shoes" is because a black man created a machine to mass produce them.  And I use "shoes" as an example cuz this woman is a simpleton....not matter the big political words she use to impress...behind it all I can tell she knows ABSOLUTELY nothing as to how America became.  Or she's doing what most whitefolks to....conveniently ignore it cuz she arrogant thinks she is superior without working for that title.  We have.  Worked without pay for hundred of years....and they STILL think they HELPED us.  GTFOH! How crazy it that thought?  She doesn't have the simple awareness to know almost every created for her comfort was forumulated by black people one way or another.  But! She doesn't appear to have knowledge of this fact.  Which is typical whitefolk "mindset."  It is psychological and tragicially psychnotic.  Plus! The same thing done to them by the British....they took it and ran with it and then did it to us....but a thousand times worse.  They don't see it.  She doesn't see it...but!  One day....it's gonna come back and bit her on the azz and it ain't gonna be NOTHING....anyone in her party can do about it.  It's gonna be either a campaign smear or something so awful in whitefolks term....that she will not be able to come out of it sane...not that she is now.  I can just see it...and it will be more than deserving....cuz with all the talk she does...I still see her as the traditional European mail order "c".  Proof?  She is behaving and doing what most "Cs" do while in an illusion that they are somehow they are better....with no jusification whatsoever! It's pitiful to watch this racist card over and over...but!  To be a fly on her wall...is probably more horribly telling than what she shows publicly...but!   I'm just sayin     

Kocolicious, I just came back from a field research trip in Mississippi. One of the things that I did was go to the courthouse in Adams county to document colored marriage records (that's what the titles of the books are) in my own family. I came across the freedman's marriage books for the year of 1866 - 1867. There were nearly 400 marriages in the book A alone! Clearly a significant group of people who sought to legitimize their 'slave marriages' by getting legally married and recognized by the state! At least in this particular county.

I am no Michelle Bachmann fan by any means and I think she is a tea bagger rabble rouser and racist, but even the author of the article couldn't come up with any countering statistics. The focus has been on the title "Michelle Bachmann Believes Black People Were Better Off During Slavery" and I have yet to read where SHE said that. We need to keep our eyes on the words not the bouncy red ball on the screen.....

I do not believe there were more 2 parents households during slavery.  Slave women were often paired with men strictly for the purpose of producing hearty slave children, regardless of whether she had affections for that man or any other man.  Children were frequently ripped from their mothers and sold like cattle.  Black Men were sold away from their loved ones for a myriad of reasons.  He MIGHT get a pass to go visit his woman and children on another plantation.  Slaves were routinely willed to heirs, sent to other relatives, moved to other plantations, etc.  People were property.  It was not a happy stable time for african-american families.  People escaped with the purpose in mind of FINDING their loved ones.I categorically reject the myth of the happy darkie so Michelle Bakkkman can dogwhistle and score cheap political points at the expense of black people or President Obama (much as he irks me)

 

Not to mention the fact that Massa was the biological father of slave children, and he hardly had them in the big house with his own children looking all similar and shit in one big happy family.  No, in many cases he sold his own flesh and blood into slavery.

 

With all of this, and the fact that mothers, fathers, and children were considered property of the master, I doubt Michelle Bakkkman or the group responsible for the pledge could come up with any stats regarding "2-parent households" in 1860 when slavery was still in full effect and slaves were not allowed to officially marry, and especially no stats that could be valid compared to modern free African-Americans. 

 

Phukk Michelle Bakkkman and every other cracker who thinks it's clever to say slavery really wasn't that bad and blacks were better off without that pesky freedom.  I hope she gets what she deserves.  

Originally Posted by Yemaya:

The focus has been on the title "Michelle Bachmann Believes Black People Were Better Off During Slavery" and I have yet to read where SHE said that. We need to keep our eyes on the words not the bouncy red ball on the screen.....

Michelle Bakkkman signed onto a pledge given to her by a "christian" group.  This means she is a public servant in agreement with the contents of the pledge and should be held accountable for propagating falsehoods about how great slavery was for black children.  Michelle Bakkkman is a dogwhistling kkklanbitch and the pledge is propaganda. 

Originally Posted by NSpirit:
Originally Posted by Yemaya:

The focus has been on the title "Michelle Bachmann Believes Black People Were Better Off During Slavery" and I have yet to read where SHE said that. We need to keep our eyes on the words not the bouncy red ball on the screen.....

Michelle Bakkkman signed onto a pledge given to her by a "christian" group.  This means she is a public servant in agreement with the contents of the pledge and should be held accountable for propagating falsehoods about how great slavery was for black children.  Michelle Bakkkman is a dogwhistling kkklanbitch and the pledge is propaganda. 

Conviently you glossed over the statement just prior to that:

 

I am no Michelle Bachmann fan by any means and I think she is a tea bagger rabble rouser and racist, but even the author of the article couldn't come up with any countering statistics.

 

So let me reiterate, I do not like Michelle Bachmann by any means because of what I perceive that she stands for. Has anyone read the entire pledge? So its propaganda, what political speech or declaration isn't?

I didn't conveniently gloss over anything.

 

I was offering my view that it's irrelevant whether or not she actually mouthed the words "black children were better off under slavery" because the facts are that she signed onto the pledge.

 

When she signed the pledge that means she supports its content and agrees with it in principle just as we're held responsible for our signature on any document we sign.  She is an attorney.  She understands signing a pledge means being held responsible for upholding or supporting the pledge.

 

She signed onto a pledge which promotes a falsely euphemistic view of how much better the institution of slavery was for black families than freedom...so IMHO there are no kernels of truth to be gleaned from the pledge regarding black family life or in Michelle Bakkkman. 

But one particular piece has everyone up in armsover the idea that she and other signatories think that black people were better off during slavery:

Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA's first African-American President.

 

 Sista Yemaya wrote:  The focus has been on the title "Michelle Bachmann Believes Black People Were Better Off During Slavery" and I have yet to read where SHE said that. We need to keep our eyes on the words not the bouncy red ball on the screen.....

 

 

 

 
 I guess the writer saw something no one else did.  And I agree with you. One really have to be careful what is heard and not said....however, really it doesn't take a genius to understand what she meant.  Especially when she was trying to rag on my President on the side.  It is clear she has no real knowledge of our history or is just in denial about the ramifications of massa's stronghold on our lives....which is typical for white trash "Cs."  Her arrogance makes me wanna poke.  Who is she?  Her twisted opinion about the crisis of blackfolks is backwards, antebellum...and "ho" need to really look in that mirror to really see a tragedy....but!  I'm just sayin 

Slavery language removed from group’s marriage pledge for candidates

 

 

 

An Iowa conservative Christian group last week essentially asked presidential contenders to say black families were better off during slavery.

 

That's right.

 

"THE FAMILY LEADER," a group run by failed GOP gubernatorial candidate Bob Vander Plaats, last week solicited GOP presidential candidates to sign a pledge attesting their support for traditional marriage, entitled "The Marriage Vow--A Declaration of Dependence upon Marriage and Family" as the first step in potentially earning their support for 2012. Social conservatives Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum quickly signed on.

 

But after the public had a chance to examine the complete document, outrage ensued over multiple provisions, including one that reportedly stated the following:

 

Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA's first African-American President.

CNN reports that the language included a citation to a document entitled: "The Consequences of Marriage for African Americans: A Comprehensive Literature Review" from 2005.

 

On Saturday, Bachmann's campaign denounced the slavery claim, telling Politico that the congresswoman had only endorsed the "candidate vow," portion of the document, which did not include the offending language.

 

"She signed the 'candidate vow,' " campaign spokeswoman Alice Stewart said. "In no uncertain terms, Congresswoman Bachmann believes that slavery was horrible and economic enslavement is also horrible."

 

Bachmann's camp reportedly forwarded a message from Family Leader later Saturday confirming that the slavery language had been removed from the full document.

 

"After careful deliberation and wise insight and input from valued colleagues we deeply respect, we agree that the statement referencing children born into slavery can be misconstrued, and such misconstruction can detract from the core message of the Marriage Vow: that ALL of us must work to strengthen and support families and marriages between one woman and one man," the group's officials said in a statement reported by multiple news outlets. "We sincerely apologize for any negative feelings this has caused, and have removed the language from the vow."

 

A spokeswoman for Santorum told CNN Monday that he was "pleased" to sign the pledge, but agreed with the group's decision.

 

"Senator Santorum believed it was the right thing for the Iowa Family Leader to remove the language from the preamble to the pledge about slavery," Virginia Davis told the cable outlet.

 

Most of the criticism over the weekend had been aimed at Bachmann, who is regarded as a stronger candidate than Santorum and has captured a polling lead in Iowa.

 

Remaining passages in the marriage document continue to roil the left and others for suggesting being gay is a choice and other language concerning homosexuality, families and a ban on pornography.

 

[You can read the full, updated pledge via the Family Leader: here.]\

"Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA's first African-American President."

 

_________________________________________________________________

 

I think that it is an insult to humanity as well as to African Americans to infer that to be a slave born to two parent homes is better than to be a free human being born into a single parent home.  Besides, her statement leaves far too much out, like the fact that most of these children born in a two parent home during slavery were the property of the plantation owner and not the parent's and was often subject to be sold for profit by the time the child reached a certain age, (you know, how people today breed dogs and sell the puppies after they are old enough for someone to want to buy one).  Not only that, at any day, even with a moment's notice either or both of the child parents could be sold away and the child left to be raised by the plantation mammy, hence the term "wet nurse", and usually something has to happen on a pretty regular basis for that action to acquire a common term.  

 

It does not matter HOW many children lived in two parent homes during slavery, there is absolutely no comparison, and none should EVER be made to any children of any type home that are free, period. If what this retarded idiot said had ANY validity whatsoever, then, people should not be so shocked to read the Jessie Dugard story, where she was kidnapped and held captive for decades, while having the children of her kidnapper----- people should say that well, at least her children grew up in a two parent home.  

 

 

 

 


Last edited by sunnubian

I think what is pissing me off most about this is the IGNORANCE and STUPIDITY involved in making such an initial statement in the first place!! 

 

And then the dumbasses always want to BACKTRACK over their idiotic, racist, stupidity-induced comments with a .... "Duh!   I didn't know what I was saying/signing!!" retraction ... and NOT because they realize that what they said was imbecilic, baseless and the mark of a feeble, brain-dead mind .... but because they get scolded like a 2-year-old toddler, caught with their hand in the cookie jar, and have no other recourse but to "play" dumb (even though they REALLY are!), and then try to extricate their foot out of their throats without gagging and barfing all over the people they're trying to impress!!

 

True enough, Michelle Bachmann is merely an air-headed scapegoat, here!!  It was OTHER people who wrote this so-called "pledge" .... but she didn't have enough good or common sense to READ what she was signing her name to BEFORE realizing that it could be detrimental to her presidential hopes!!    She was just a typical "sheep" being lead to slaughter.  And went willingly ... right up to the blades ... before it dawned on her that she was about to get her head chopped off!! 

 

What a moron. 

First....I totally agree with you Sista Sunnubian.  And secondly I agree with you Sista ER...in that many whitefolks [although they TRY to appear intelligent] are really STUPID and IGNORANT.  A term I used for some backwards thinking and bad behaviorist blackfolks.  This title doesn't DISCRIMINATE.  And as sista Sunnubian elegantly says..."the fact that most of these children born in a two parent home during slavery were the property of the plantation owner and not the parent's and was often subject to be sold for profit by the time the child reached a certain age, (you know, how people today breed dogs and sell the puppies after they are old enough for someone to want to buy one).  Not only that, at any day, even with a moment's notice either or both of the child parents could be sold away and the child left to be raised by the plantation mammy, hence the term "wet nurse", and usually something has to happen on a pretty regular basis for that action to acquire a common term" displays  EXACTLY why you cannot believe a word white politicans say in regards to slavery.  Cuz they wanna whitewash it...like it was some kind of fantasy stage or existence for blackfolks...when in reality it was the most horrific crime in modern times....but!  They don't wanna talk about that.  Oh noooooooooo.  They wanna spew this hollywood ignorance and stupidity that displays us as happy chattels depending on the white masters for decisions on our lives...without EVER acknowledging the FACT that we were SLAVES...in a FORCED situation.   And that THEY were the monster aggressors.  And that they USED us to help them become RICH and independent from Britian/Ireland/Scotland/other European countries that made BANK off the blood, sweat and DEATH of our ancestors. 

 

And again my Sista ER, you are RIGHT...i.e. correct.  White folks are morons...and a total TRIP....without us they would still be picking rotten potatoes and turnips living off a land that would never be theirs....but!  I'm just sayin 

 

 

  One more thang..... I'm NOT even gonna go there regarding that christian religious bullshyte they are trying SMEAR on folks...cuz that's what got US here in chains in the first place.  And hiding behind GOD to do horrible things....and pretend you are not but are trying to save the souls of folks you believe are savages and uncivilized in a continent they have been living in peace and prosperity for thousands of years is..........asine, crazy and ARROGANT.  Especially when you come from an environment that could not feed or sustain itself.  For this holier than thou crap...as of yet I haven't seen ANY of the white masters ever bring back the dead...they haven't even brought back Jesus.  So they can miss me with that crazy shyte.  If there is one i.e. God, we know that THEY i.e. whitefolks are the true DEVIL in this solar system.   Cuz no GOD I know of would EVER allow a human being to encroach another human being for profit and POWER.  Cuz why?  Those are SINS!!!  And if there is a heaven and hell....we all KNOW whitefolks are gonna burn in hell for generations to come....but! I'm just saying  

On side note, if I were a republican female, I would be highly insulted that the republican party keeps parading dumb ignorant women like Bauchman and Palin out front as representative of the republican party and republican women in general.  It is hard for me to believe that there are not any knowledgeable, intelligent republican women out there.  It seems to me that the republicans are playing their sexism card by continuing to showcase bimbos over intelligent, accomplished and politically astute women.  But, then again, since the republicans jumped in bed with the Klan during the Reagan era, and have let their party become infiltrated by all manor or racist idiot and racist sadist, what else do they have to work with.

But but But!!!!  My sista....there are no intelligent white women...except for a couple.  Cuz any white woman who have the NERVE to say what Michelle has said over the course of her campaign...is a straight out ignorant azz FOOL!!! Who the fock does she THINK she is?  She's definitely not God...can't bring back the dead...and and and can't walk on water.  So. Why does she THINK she can EVER say ANYTHING about what blackfolks do or do not do with their CHILDREN.  She is a "c." No human being in their RIGHT mind would ever say something so stupid and asine...or sign something so stupid and asine.  Can't the bitch READ?  I am tired of white folks thinking that they have the 411 on blackfolks.  Not!  Just cuz you white mofos were devils and stole an entire continent with its people...by no standards make you GOD or superior.  They wanna ignore the HARM they have done to MANY people across this global.  So this "c" really better watch her back...cuz she has downslid every since she made that ridiculous assessment.  Like blackfolks are not PEOPLE.  GTFOH!!!  That's the type of bullshyte that pisses me off.

 

I would LOVE to be in a room with this ho and let us KNOW exactly what she can do with her ignorant, stupid arrogant for no reason ASS.  I would wear her mfing azz out.  Whoever wrote that article is clearly a racist animal.  The nerve to convenient ignore the fact that black people were slaves....and were kept against their will as human beings...and then say something so outta the box bullshyte to make their white azzes  look like they are more CIVILIZED and superior...not!  I know the mofos were short of being wild animals without the common sense of a billy goat to get themselves out of the human crisis that affected Europe.  I know that the Scots/Irish came to America and DID the SAME thang to us...that would done to them...but!  The difference was that THEY were MORE cruel to us.  I know that these folks are nothing but Neanderthals...who luckily was able to procreate with us i.e. modern humans to bridge over the wall from being just a mammal. I know this...but!  A lotta us don't know this and will believe the bullshyte that they are STILL trying to spew on us.  It just makes me sooooooo angry.  I can just spit fire.  And the thing is we as a people are always trying to bring each other down outta ignorance and stupidity while cunts like her and dicks like the republicans continue to spread propaganda lies about who we are as human beings.  So she can miss me with that stupid bullshyte...and if she is a christian like she says she is....I KNOW I wouldn't wanna go any where close to that religion or to her GOD....no where near....but!  I'm just sayin

 

Last edited by Kocolicious
Originally Posted by sunnubian:

On side note, if I were a republican female, I would be highly insulted that the republican party keeps parading dumb ignorant women like Bauchman and Palin out front as representative of the republican party and republican women in general.  It is hard for me to believe that there are not any knowledgeable, intelligent republican women out there.  It seems to me that the republicans are playing their sexism card by continuing to showcase bimbos over intelligent, accomplished and politically astute women.  But, then again, since the republicans jumped in bed with the Klan during the Reagan era, and have let their party become infiltrated by all manor or racist idiot and racist sadist, what else do they have to work with.

 

I'm gonna have to agree with Ms. Koco on this one .... I don't think that Republican + intelligence are really two words that go together!!    At least not in a political sense.  And, therefore, Bachmann and Palin are actually VERY representative of typical female (or male, for that matter) Republican ideology!!  Which is SCARY on number of levels .... but, even more so because that's just the REALITY of the situation.  And there's not a whole lot that can be done about that.  The words "You can't fix stupid" are actually very true. 

 

And I think one of the biggest and most simple indicators of this truth is to simply look at the Republican one-track-mind "plan of action" that no matter WHAT happens ... their ONLY goal is to make sure that President Obama is not re-elected. They are doing whatever they THINK it takes to make that happen.  But, that one, single-minded, goal of vindictive, stubborn, ignorant deduction is driving the economy into the ground, keeping businesses from alleviating the unemployment crisis by hiring new workers, sending MILLIONS of Americans into default on their homes, wages, and basic necessities, allowing corporations to horde BILLIONS of dollars that would bring in much-needed, economic relief on ALL fronts, and the same with banks who are refusing to offer credit, even to the MOST CREDIT-WORTHY business and individuals which is crushing any hope of economic recovery.

 

All of those that have the power to either make or break the stability of this country are REPUBLICANS!!  And they are choosing to BREAK any hope of helping the country or doing the right thing ... for one reason, and one reason only:  They don't like the current President of the United States.

 

Now, not only is that kind of thinking immature and ill-conceived - because the consequences can be devastating and long-lasting - it's just plain STUPID and IGNORANT and a mark of some kind of legitimate BRAIN DAMAGE ... because these are GROWN people - (supposed to be) ADULTS, who are in positions of extreme power, throwing toddler-like tantrums at the expense of millions of other human beings.

 

Bachmann and Palin are NOT embarrassments to their supporters.  They are true Representatives and 'poster children' of the STUPIDITY that IS their entire political Party!!

Sista ER wrote: 

 

And I think one of the biggest and most simple indicators of this truth is to simply look at the Republican one-track-mind "plan of action" that no matter WHAT happens ... their ONLY goal is to make sure that President Obama is not re-elected. They are doing whatever they THINK it takes to make that happen.  But, that one, single-minded, goal of vindictive, stubborn, ignorant deduction is driving the economy into the ground, keeping businesses from alleviating the unemployment crisis by hiring new workers, sending MILLIONS of Americans into default on their homes, wages, and basic necessities, allowing corporations to horde BILLIONS of dollars that would bring in much-needed, economic relief on ALL fronts, and the same with banks who are refusing to offer credit, even to the MOST CREDIT-WORTHY business and individuals which is crushing any hope of economic recovery.

 

  Yep!  And they are WILLING to throw EVERYBODY under the bus. 

 

All of those that have the power to either make or break the stability of this country are REPUBLICANS!!  And they are choosing to BREAK any hope of helping the country or doing the right thing ... for one reason, and one reason only:  They don't like the current President of the United States.

 

Yep!  As I said in another post....they are willing to break this system to keep from giving a black president any kind of power.  They are no better than Al Queda's suicide bombers i.e. suicide republicans.  In that they are more than willing to dismantle the most powerful country in the world....than to give my President the power he deserves and the power Americans voted for him to HAVE!!!! These racist morons...are the true vacuum brained neantherals I've been penning since being on this site.  And I now have current visible proof!  And you're sooooo right my sista...they have this one-sided brain that controls their vindictiveness, stubbornness and ignorance and is aggressively displayed with they don't get their way....or is destructively displayed with the slave becomes the master....or when the hunter gets captured by the game.  They don't KNOW how to process this.  Why?  Cuz they think with one portion of their brains and do not have the cognitive ability to process anything else outside of that spectrum. 

 

 Like animals, they prey on the unsuspecting....and if they do not KILL, they brainwash the vulnerable into believing that they are here to save them from themselves.  And the reality of it is, it was ALL about them:  the white race.  Because they have been the global leader of this sick mindset, the bully tactics no longer works cuz now you have other countries getting involved in the self-sustaining high technology...and the boogey man don't look so frigthening when you can feed yourself and your family without its pieces of so-called help.  Today it is a different dynamics, cuz they i.e. republicans really think they have my President by the balls.  What they are forgetting or don't realize is that he is extremely popular outside America.  And have a coalition that is willing to come to his aid.  Watch!  For the first time in its history, America is not the global scary bully it thinks it still is.  As a matter fact, almost every civilized/unciviled country seems to LOVE my President.  Cuz he represents the underdog....which many countries understand that particular and unique position[and if it wasn't for this Israel/Middle East conflict...he would be popular with them too].  So.  Yall hold on to your seats...cuz it's gonna be a ride you never experienced before.  Trust me.  But!  I'm just sayin 

Last edited by Kocolicious
Originally Posted by sunnubian:

On side note, if I were a republican female, I would be highly insulted that the republican party keeps parading dumb ignorant women like Bauchman and Palin out front as representative of the republican party and republican women in general.  It is hard for me to believe that there are not any knowledgeable, intelligent republican women out there.  It seems to me that the republicans are playing their sexism card by continuing to showcase bimbos over intelligent, accomplished and politically astute women.  But, then again, since the republicans jumped in bed with the Klan during the Reagan era, and have let their party become infiltrated by all manor or racist idiot and racist sadist, what else do they have to work with.

But..but..but...

 

That's what they stand for right?  Republicans/Conservatives are for "traditional family values" meaning subservient women, with no reproductive rights, dependent on a husband, only concerned with the children, hyper-religious yada yada yada. I believe they were called soccer moms during one election cycle and "security moms" during the most recent. Even the "driven outspoken republican woman" types IE Ann Coulter, Carly Fiorina, Michelle Malkin cater to this demographic's worldview.  White republican women are calling in to Hannity, Glenn Beck, and Limbaugh thanking them for being such patriots on a daily basis.

 

Why don't these conservative bimbos Palin or Bachmann or Christine the witch from Delaware accurately represent them?

Last edited by NSpirit

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×