Skip to main content

How Corporations Corrupt Science at the Public's Expense

 

Report looks at methods of corporate abuse, suggests steps toward reform

Federal decision makers need access to the best available science in order to craft policies that protect our health, safety, and environment.

Unfortunately, censorship of scientists and the manipulation, distortion, and suppression of scientific information have threatened federal science in recent years.

This problem has sparked much debate, but few have identified the key driver of political interference in federal science: the inappropriate influence of companies with a financial stake in the outcome.

 

A new UCS report, Heads They Win, Tails We Lose, shows how corporations influence the use of science in federal decision making to serve their own interests.

 

Methods of Abuse

 

The report describes five basic methods that corporations use to influence the scientific and policy-making processes:

 

How Do They Game the System?


Let Us Recount the Ways

 

Heads They Win, Tails We Lose is full of real-world examples of the ways corporations interfere with science. Here are just a few of the highlights:

Suppressing Research:


Hog Farm Emissions

After pork producers contacted his supervisors, a USDA microbiologist was prevented from publishing research showing that emissions from industrial hog farms contained antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Corrupting Advisory Panels:
Childhood Lead Poisoning

A few weeks before a CDC advisory panel met to discuss revising federal lead standards, two scientists with ties to the lead industry were added to the panel. The committee voted against tightening the standards.

Ghostwriting Articles:
The Pharmaceutical Industry

A 2011 analysis found evidence of corporate authorship in research articles on a variety of drugs, including Avandia, Paxil, Tylenol, and Vioxx.

For more examples, visit our A-to-Z Guide to Political Interference in Science.

Corrupting the Science. Corporations suppress research, intimidate scientists, manipulate study designs, ghostwrite scientific articles, and selectively publish results that suit their interests.

 

Shaping Public Perception. Private interests downplay evidence, exaggerate uncertainty, vilify scientists, hide behind front groups, and feed the media slanted news stories.

Restricting Agency Effectiveness. Companies attack the science behind agency policy, hinder the regulatory process, corrupt advisory panels, exploit the "revolving door" between corporate and government employment, censor scientists, and withhold information from the public.

 

Influencing Congress. By spending billions of dollars on lobbying and campaign contributions, corporate interests gain undue access to members of Congress, encouraging them to challenge scientific consensus, delay action on critical problems, and shape the use of science in policy making.

 

Exploiting Judicial Pathways. Corporate interests have expanded their influence on the judicial system, used the courts to undermine science, and exploited judicial processes to bully and silence scientists.

 

Progress Made (and Still To Be Made)

In his 2009 inaugural address, President Obama promised to "restore science to its rightful place." His administration has made progress toward that goal on several important fronts—elevating the role of science in government, ordering agencies to develop scientific integrity policies, improving transparency, and strengthening conflict-of-interest policies.

 

Despite these positive steps, much remains to be done. The report identifies five key areas where further federal commitments to protect science from undue corporate influence are needed: protecting government scientists from retaliation and intimidation; making government more transparent and accountable; reforming the regulatory process; strengthening scientific advice to government; and strengthening monitoring and enforcement.

 

Beyond Government

 

Corporations, nonprofits, academic institutions, scientific societies, and the media also have critical roles to play in reducing abuses of science in federal decision making. These institutions should:

  • promote honest scientific investigation and open discussion of research results;
  • refrain from actual or perceived acts of scientific misconduct;
  • embrace transparency and avoid conflicts of interest.

Inappropriate corporate interference in science extends its tentacles into every aspect of federal science-based policy-making. Addressing this interference will require overcoming high hurdles, but they are not insurmountable. With strong leadership and a sustained commitment, both the federal government and the private sector can rise to the challenge.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"I'm just trying to make a way out of no way, for my people" -Modejeska Monteith Simpkins

 

AFRICAN AMERICA IS AT WAR

THERE IS A RACE WAR ON AFRICAN AMERICA

THERE IS A RACE WAR ON AFRICAN AMERICANS

THERE IS A RACE WAR ON BLACK PEOPLE IN AMERICA

AMERICA'S RACISTS HAVE INFILTRATED AMERICAN POLICE FORCES TO WAGE A RACE WAR AGAINST BLACK PEOPLE IN AMERICA

THE BLACK RACE IS AT WAR

FIRST WORLD WAR:  THE APPROXIMATELY 6,000 YEAR WORLD WAR ON AFRICA AND THE BLACK RACE

Original Post

Now that is truly hilarious.  How do we expect to resolve complicated scientific problems when we cannot address simple ones?

 

Is the Empire State Building 80 years old or not?  The neutron had not even been discovered when the ESB was completed.  There were no electronic computers when the ESB was designed.  Don't all skyscrapers have to hold themselves up?  Doesn't that mean more weight must be supported toward the bottom?  Doesn't that mean there must be more steel toward the bottom?

 

So why haven't SCIENTISTS been talking about having accurate data on the distributions of steel and concrete down the WTC towers to analyse if an airliner and resulting fire could destroy them in less than TWO HOURS?

 

Black Americans need White people to tell them what to think about science.  And if most of the White people are DUMB....

 

If we can't resolve the simple stuff we better forget the complicated science.

 

European culture is a culture of liars.  Being able to get away with a lie is regarded as SMART.  Double-entry accounting is 700 years old but we get 4 years of English Lit in high school and no accounting.  Why haven't Black Americans mad a National Recommended Reading List for themselves and said to hell with whatever the White people do?  Maybe we are more stingy with knowledge than they are.

 

Omnilingual  by H. Beam Piper
http://librivox.org/omnilingual-by-h-beam-piper/
http://www.feedbooks.com/book/308/omnilingual
All Day September  by Roger Kuykendall
http://www.feedbooks.com/book/2295/all-day-september
The Fourth R  by George O. Smith
http://www.onread.com/book/The-Fourth-R-17950/
Badge of Infamy by Lester del Rey
http://www.booksshouldbefree.c...my-by-lester-del-rey
Eight Keys to Eden  by Mark Clifton
http://www.mysterious-strange-...ional-mysteries.html
http://www.onread.com/book/Eight-Keys-to-Eden-6514/
There Will Be School Tomorrow, by V. E. Thiessen
www.feedbooks.com/userbook/11643.pdf

 

Xum

Last edited by Xumbrarchist

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×