What are ˜extreme' hairdos for amusement park workers?
By ROSE RUSSELL
FOLKS are intimidated about hair, especially black people's hair. This was an issue in the 1980s, and hasn't been in the news until recently when Six Flags amusement park in Largo, Md., targeted employees wearing "extreme hairstyles," such as locks "” also called dreadlocks "” long braids, and some cornrows.
The park's new general manger is a black man. But more about Terry Prather later.
Six Flags America's 2006 seasonal handbook says workers can't wear locks, tails, partially shaved heads, "or any hairstyle that detracts or takes away from Six Flags theming," the Washington Post reports.
Employees at a theme park wearing those styles wouldn't bother me. So I wonder why Six Flags wants the hair of workers who are mostly out in the hot sun all day to look as though they just left a board meeting.
Visitors comfortably dressed in summer clothes include many African-Americans who wear styles that park workers can't.
Six Flags told a male teenager to cut his hair and have it braided into cornrows. He did, and was told to cut it shorter. Another young man's mother cut two feet off his three-foot long braids, and he was also told to cut more.
Northwest Ohio's renowned Cedar Point says young men's hair cannot be longer than the tops of their collars, according to Robin Innes, director of public relations. That makes sense for young men in business offices, but I don't get the restriction for a theme park. And I don't understand why locks and cornrows with designs are considered "extreme." Is that so because whites don't like them?
Jonathan DeLeon, hired to portray Sylvester and Daffy Duck at Six Flags, who cut his braids, said, "They said they wanted an all-American thing. That's what they said to all the black people."
Targeting blacks tells me the desire for an "all-American" look is hair that is straight, short, and bouncy, or straight, long, and swingy. Many white people's hair is not like that. Many black people's hair is.
These policies are widespread. Jacob DiPietre, spokesman for Walt Disney World, was quoted as saying he doesn't "think" locks are allowed there. He added, "Their hair has to be clean, natural, and polished."
There's a misconception that people who wear locks do not wash their hair. Not true. As for hair that's natural, as Mr.DiPietre said, when many black people's hair is natural, it is kinky and nappy, and the wearer usually sports an afro.
Cedar Point doesn't allow locks or cornrows with designs either. Mr. Innes says the park doesn't have much problem with the issue, which is also addressed in its manual. Anybody seeking work there is aware of the guidelines and agrees to abide by them if hired.
The description of what's deemed "extreme" gets me, though. Mr. Innes said, "We get few [styles] that are patterned because they are extreme and extreme is not permitted." His reference to "patterned" concerns cornrows.
He said such "extreme" hairdos worn by workers is "very uncommon. We think it's important to have a uniform look for employees."
For many blacks, though, there's nothing "extreme" or uncommon about these hairstyles. So I ask, uncommon to whom? To whites, and some blacks?
Male business administration majors at Hampton University, a historically black university in Virginia, are not allowed to meet corporate executives if their hair is in "extreme" styles. That's understandable. And I understand why such dos are not accepted in corporate America where men wear white shirts, conservative ties, suits, and shoes, and where women wear conservative suits and dresses, pumps, and no colored hose or dangling earrings.
Nobody whose hair and clothes are not conservative can expect to advance in the business world. People who wear clothes that are too baggy, too tight, or too skimpy can't expect to win promotions either.
But I don't get making park workers abide by a "uniform" look, when what's forbidden is directed at one ethnic group.
Employees who prefer "extreme" hairstyles at Six Flags in Maryland won't find a friend in Mr. Prather. He has enforced the policy since February when he joined the board. Violating it leads to customer service problems, he said. He should know. As the father of adult children, he's personally dealt with the matter.
He calls the policy neither antiquated nor discriminatory, which tells me he embraces it. That's great. But the subordinates to whom the policy is directed are amusement park employees, for goodness' sakes. Maybe they will find a better friend in the ACLU.
Rose Russell is a Blade associate editor.
» Read more Rose Russell columns at
www.toledoblade.com/russe