Ok, I'm confused... Were the invading Aryan hordes(a history I am familiar with) supposed to be basically the 'returning' albinized Dravidians?
Not necessarily. Elijah Muhammad claims that there was a mass exodus from Arabia, not Harrapa or Mohenjo Daro. I provided the photo of the Indian man simply to provide the reader with a visual aid which approximates what he meant when he spoke of a black person from the North of Africa, or Asia during that time period. Now, I will say that there was a cultural unity of sorts between the ancient kingdoms occupied by the Dravidian and the various kingdoms of North Africa, including KMT. I do believe that phenotypically, the people of this entire region would have appeared very similiar to one another..Of course their would be some variations, but nothing material.
The Indians (used in the video are phenotypically a mixture of Dravidian and those exact invading Aryans... The Aryans, like many of their progeny, the Northern Indiam castes in the video (Brahmans, Kshatriyas, & Vaishyas), have a 'European' look, to varying degrees(hence their higher caste)...
The Dalits, or "Untouchables" are not genectically distinct from those of higher caste..they are just darker..The groups within the caste system was called "varna" which translates to mean "color". The stratification was designed to separate the dark black from the lighter and so forth....
Aren't you using the mixed offspring to prove the theory that their parents originated 'from them'? That doesn't make sense... The unmixed 'tribal' Dravidians of the South(Check Runoko Rashidi's sight for examples) do not have the European phenotype and look much like the Australian aboriginal... Sub-Saharan African with straighter hair... That look Albinized looks nothing like a European... Neither do the Dalits... not even the Shudras..
Well, once again, several studies were conducted to provide scientific justification for the caste arrangement. What was determined was that was no significant variant besides color of the northern higher caste Brahmans, Kshatriyas, & Vaishyas from lower caste Dalit- Shudras. Now of course the introduction of the Aryan strain did provide some genetic diversity, however, according to what I have studied the Aryan injection provided for a significant change in color yet did not structurally change the other dominant features of the Dravidian in any significant way.
Runoko Rashidi and Professor Cheikh Anta Diop spoke to this: The term "Dravidian," however, encompasses both an ethnic group and a linguistic group. The ethnic group is characterized by straight to wavy hair textures, combined with Africoid physical features.
-Runoko Rashidi "There are two well-defined Black races: one has a black skin and woolly hair; the other also has black skin, often exceptionally black, with straight hair, aquiline nose, thin lips, an acute cheekbone angle. We find a prototype of this race in India: the Dravidian. It is also known that certain Nubians likewise belong to the same Negro type...."
I think it is well established by our own scholars that the straight hair, aqualine nose, and thin lip features of our people is just as ancient and "black", as broad noses, lips and woolly hair.
Those who argue against the afrocentric worldview have discovered this aspect of our past and have tried to hijack our history arguing that Northern Kingdoms and asiatic blacks were more caucasian than black due to structural similiarities with whites..In making this argument they simply confirm Mr. Muhammad's teaching..
It would have made more sense if you peppered it with pepper.
You know what Bruh...don't even stress yourself about it..Maybe one of the other posters will tuck you in...shhh..I'll hit the lights..