Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

"He also says that  mothers actually “psychologically cαstrate their sons and then wonder why they turn gay later on.  Listen to his words and tell us what you think"

**************************************************************************

 

This is the most asinine explanation of homosexuality period, let alone specifically homosexuality in the Black community.  

 

It's time for all these Black men with "mommy issues" to stop trying extrapolate their own life and the characters of their own mothers onto ALL Black women.

 

First of all, it's really rare that a mother ever or ever desires to "psychologically castrate" her son, and it's ever rarer still that an African American mother would or desires to.  It's time for these Black men that are just not really sure of their own masculinity to stop trying to blame Black women for their lack of it.  

 

Hell, they way they are talking, you would think that over 50 or 70 percent of Black males were gay or emasculated to begin with, which is surely not the case.  

 

I thought this brother had some damn sense.  Evidently, all he really as is an audience gullible enough to believe to this sexist Black-woman hater misinformation.

 

But, hell no, Black males/African American males are not going to neglect their children, families, communities, and their race, then try to put all the blame for the negative results of it all on Black women.   

 

If this were a hundred years ago, after years of unusually cold or wet or dry weather, or when they never planted any seeds to begin with or rarely or never tended the crops, Black men who think like this, would say it was Black women's fault that the crops failed.  All mitigating circumstances would be ignored or glossed over and their own irresponsibility would fail to be mentioned.   

Originally Posted by sunnubian:

"He also says that  mothers actually “psychologically cαstrate their sons and then wonder why they turn gay later on.  Listen to his words and tell us what you think"

**************************************************************************

 

This is the most asinine explanation of homosexuality period, let alone specifically homosexuality in the Black community.  

 

It's time for all these Black men with "mommy issues" to stop trying extrapolate their own life and the characters of their own mothers onto ALL Black women.

 

First of all, it's really rare that a mother ever or ever desires to "psychologically castrate" her son, and it's ever more rare still, that an African American mother would or desires to.  It's time for these Black men that are just not really sure of their own masculinity to stop trying to blame Black women for their lack of it.  

 

Hell, they way they are talking, you would think that over 50 or 70 percent of Black males were gay or emasculated to begin with, which is surely not the case.  

 

I thought this brother had some damn sense.  Evidently, all he really as is an audience gullible enough to believe to this sexist Black-woman hater misinformation.

 

But, hell no, Black males/African American males are not going to neglect their children, families, communities, and their race, then try to put all the blame for the negative results of it all on Black women.   

 

If this were a hundred years ago, after years of unusually cold or wet or dry weather, or when they never planted any seeds to begin with or rarely or never tended the crops, Black men who think like this, would say it was Black women's fault that the crops failed.  All mitigating circumstances would be ignored or glossed over and their own irresponsibility would fail to be mentioned.   

 

Originally Posted by sunnubian:
Originally Posted by sunnubian:

"He also says that  mothers actually “psychologically cαstrate their sons and then wonder why they turn gay later on.  Listen to his words and tell us what you think"

**************************************************************************

 

This is the most asinine explanation of homosexuality period, let alone specifically homosexuality in the Black community.  

 

It's time for all these Black men with "mommy issues" to stop trying extrapolate their own life and the characters of their own mothers onto ALL Black women.

 

First of all, it's really rare that a mother ever or ever desires to "psychologically castrate" her son, and it's ever more rare still, that an African American mother would or desires to.  It's time for these Black men that are just not really sure of their own masculinity to stop trying to blame Black women for their lack of it.  

 

Hell, the way they are talking, you would think that over 50 or 70 percent of Black males were gay or emasculated to begin with, which is surely not the case.  

 

I thought this brother had some damn sense.  Evidently, all he really as is an audience gullible enough to believe to this sexist Black-woman hater misinformation.

 

But, hell no, Black males/African American males are not going to neglect their children, families, communities, and their race, then try to put all the blame for the negative results of it all on Black women.   

 

If this were a hundred years ago, after years of unusually cold or wet or dry weather, or when they never planted any seeds to begin with or rarely or never tended the crops, Black men who think like this, would say it was Black women's fault that the crops failed.  All mitigating circumstances would be ignored or glossed over and their own irresponsibility would fail to be mentioned.   

 

 

Originally Posted by sunnubian:
Originally Posted by sunnubian:
Originally Posted by sunnubian:

"He also says that  mothers actually “psychologically cαstrate their sons and then wonder why they turn gay later on.  Listen to his words and tell us what you think"

**************************************************************************

 

This is the most asinine explanation of homosexuality period, let alone specifically homosexuality in the Black community.  

 

It's time for all these Black men with "mommy issues" to stop trying extrapolate their own life and the characters of their own mothers onto ALL Black women.

 

First of all, it's really rare that a mother ever or ever desires to "psychologically castrate" her son, and it's ever more rare still, that an African American mother would or desires to.  It's time for these Black men that are just not really sure of their own masculinity to stop trying to blame Black women for their lack of it.  

 

Hell, the way they are talking, you would think that over 50 or 70 percent of Black males were gay or emasculated to begin with, which is surely not the case.  

 

I thought this brother had some damn sense.  Evidently, all he really has is an audience gullible enough to believe this sexist Black-woman hater misinformation.

 

But, hell no, Black males/African American males are not going to neglect their children, families, communities, and their race, then try to put all the blame for the negative results of it all on Black women.   

 

If this were a hundred years ago, after years of unusually cold or wet or dry weather, or when they never planted any seeds to begin with or rarely or never tended the crops, Black men who think like this, would say it was Black women's fault that the crops failed.  All mitigating circumstances would be ignored or glossed over and their own irresponsibility would fail to be mentioned.   

 

 

 

Sista Sunnubian wrote:  It's time for all these Black men with "mommy issues" to stop trying extrapolate their own life and the characters of their own mothers onto ALL Black women.
 
 
  Blaming the women has always been MEN'S way of justifying their bad behavior.  Had any of these fools LISTENED to their mom's there would LESS war in the world....and sexuality hasn't a thang to do with being parental.  That's the FIRST lie.  
 
First of all, it's really rare that a mother ever or ever desires to "psychologically castrate" her son, and it's ever more rare still, that an African American mother would or desires to.  It's time for these Black men that are just not really sure of their own masculinity to stop trying to blame Black women for their lack of it.  
 
Black women wouldn't castrate their boys-that's ridiculous.  But it all goes back to slavery where black men were stripped of their ability to protect the women in their village.  And since this is a trained discipline from other males to younger males, it was NEVER taught again.  And black little boys look to massa for guidance.  And massa blame their mothers for being slaves like he blames his mother for not nurturing him to grow into more civilized ways than barbaric.  In massa's world women had no power.....different from the African world. Therefore what has been passed down from other black males in this country is the SAME fear experienced in Africa.  As why it is easier for black men to turn against each other than to seek culture harmony.   
 
Hell, they way they are talking, you would think that over 50 or 70 percent of Black males were gay or emasculated to begin with, which is surely not the case.  
 
Cuz if that was the case trust and believe that would have been no need to lynch and castrate them during Jim Crow.  I mean if we are to believe what they say.  No it's more than that.  Black men have been psychological raped by massa since slavery and before "raped" by the Arab who turned them into the "third" gender.    As what is happening to our young men today is reflective of what's really going on out there.
 
I thought this brother had some damn sense.  Evidently, all he really as is an audience gullible enough to believe to this sexist Black-woman hater misinformation.
 
Nope.  Just a hater as you say.  Not wrapped too tight either. Probably wanna join the young gays in some down low shanagians.  Wouldn't put it pass him.  I have learned through the years the ones who SCREAMS homophobic the loudest [men] are the ones....doing it in the closet.  I reminded of a bishop I know.  Huh!  You know the one who had to pay off all those young patrishers who were initiated in his male camp during church time?
 
 
But, hell no, Black males/African American males are not going to neglect their children, families, communities, and their race, then try to put all the blame for the negative results of it all on Black women.   
 
Nope.  That's typical angry man [who really want to be an open gay] complainer.  And I tell you almost every male including black man are jealous and envious of black women so to mitigate the rage....they blame her for THEIR anger... that they are either not women themselves...or upset that now they like to do it with men.  Can't have it both ways fellas-need to make up your minds.
 
 
If this were a hundred years ago, after years of unusually cold or wet or dry weather, or when they never planted any seeds to begin with or rarely or never tended the crops, Black men who think like this, would say it was Black women's fault that the crops failed.  All mitigating circumstances would be ignored or glossed over and their own irresponsibility would fail to be mentioned.   
I agree.  Cuz remember most of rest of the world is in its patriarch stance.  You can tell their feelings toward their women based on how they TREAT them.  And worldwide?  Ain't looking good but it goes back to the truth of the matter in that they are JEALOUS of who we women are as human dynamics that bring other humans in the world.  And with all that men do in the world ....they can't TOP that....so it pisses them off like in a sport game.  So what does man do?  Sew up the woman.  And abuse the little boys.  Then turn around and BLAME the woman for abusing the little boys.  Basically not taking accountability for their behavior.  Pitiful.  But! 
Last edited by Kocolicious

What they are trying to do is "normalize" sociopathic behavior in Black males/African American males by using Black people/Black males to infiltrate the Black psyche and implant such false garbage.  

 

Lynching Black people was outlawed in this country, Planned Parenthood did not decrease the African American birthrate as much as was planned.

 

The high rate of teen/youth pregnancies has thwarted mass incarceration of Black people serving as population birth control.

 

The Drugs and Guns and HIV/AIDS funneled into the Black community is not killing the projected number of Blacks.  

 

The only thing left in their arsenal is psychology, i.e., psychological and propaganda warfare. the psychology [psychological warfare tactic] of creating the situation for those in the group to turn on each other. 

 

That's really all this type of rhetoric is.  

Sista Sunnubian wrote:  Who gets to decide whose "choice" is "bad"?

 

  Exactly my sista.  Children come into the WORLD in all types of situations i.e. unexpected, planned, being merely a couple of 'em.  There is nothing BAD about creating life once its done. In that once the decision has been MADE to bring it forth....where in that choice is it now deemed "bad?"  Me personally hate to hear "children" expressed in this manner.  A child is NEVER a "bad" choice.  No matter what day-mother's day, father's day....cuz the decision was made upon conception.  The man decided NOT to wear a condom-I guess it was okay with the woman too.  Cuz if the man had decided to wear a condom?  No baby.  Right?  So maybe I'm missing somethin.  But!   

Last edited by Kocolicious
Originally Posted by RadioRaheem:
Originally Posted by sunnubian:

Who gets to decide whose "choice" is "bad"?

 

Mother's Day is for ALL mothers, even mothers who never actually gave birth, but adopted.   

+ I'll say the taxpayer.  Many of these 'strong, independent, Queen' single mothers are on public aid

 

Contrary to popular belief, the majority of them are not on any public aid, but for even those that are, what of all the non-Black women in America that are also on "public aid"?  Or the fact that most of these 'strong, independent, Queen' single mothers are taxpayers. Are you implying that only certain taxpayers should be the only ones to decide what is or is not a "bad choice"?  

 

Didn't our people live through this very thing in this country from reconstruction through jim crow, where even though they were also taxpayers, America's racists wanted to be the only ones calling all the shots.  

 

Haven't we already lived through centuries in this country where there were those [and still are] that deemed all Black people unworthy and a group that should be hated, oppressed, undermined, and annihilated.

 

So, you suggest that Black people should take on the same bigotry, hatred, and set out to deliberately scheme to hate and destroy a portion of our own group, which at last estimates, was around 70%.  

 

Some thing you don't get to decide for other people, some things you do not have the right to decide for other people, sometimes you are only cutting off your nose to spite your face.  

 

 

Originally Posted by sunnubian:
Originally Posted by RadioRaheem:
Originally Posted by sunnubian:

Who gets to decide whose "choice" is "bad"?

 

Mother's Day is for ALL mothers, even mothers who never actually gave birth, but adopted.   

+ I'll say the taxpayer.  Many of these 'strong, independent, Queen' single mothers are on public aid

 

Contrary to popular belief, the majority of them are not on any public aid, but for even those that are, what of all the non-Black women in America that are also on "public aid"?  Or the fact that most of these 'strong, independent, Queen' single mothers are taxpayers. Are you implying that only certain taxpayers should be the only ones to decide what is or is not a "bad choice"?  

 

Didn't our people live through this very thing in this country from reconstruction through jim crow, where even though they were also taxpayers, America's racists wanted to be the only ones calling all the shots.  

 

Haven't we already lived through centuries in this country where there were those [and still are] that deemed all Black people unworthy and a group that should be hated, oppressed, undermined, and annihilated.

 

So, you suggest that Black people should take on the same bigotry, hatred, and set out to deliberately scheme to hate and destroy a portion of our own group, which at last estimates, was around 70%.  

 

Some thing you don't get to decide for other people, some things you do not have the right to decide for other people, sometimes you are only cutting off your nose to spite your face.  

 

 

+ but many ARE on Public Aid, which includes Section 8 housing, food stamps, WIC vouchers, MedicAid, and Welfare checks.  Are you sure that a 'majority' don't receive help from ANY of these programs??  

 

 

  So here comes the blame game in another form....so it's black mothers' fault that they have an option to take care of their families despite the absence of the father....it's black mothers' fault that they are NOT thrown under by our society like women/children are in so many other [patriarchal countries]  Okay I get it now.  So the MAN who isn't required to wear a condom if he doesn't wanna...Ooops get a woman pregnant....had no intentions on sticking around in the first place...as a result of 2 second union...a baby is conceived....without the man in sight...the woman now has to decide if she wants to deliver a baby now that she's pregnant since it is SHE who allowed the man NOT to wear condom....so before and after the delivery it is SHE who decided to go to public assistance and get support for her new baby who by the way?  Didn't ask to be a part of this mess.    And because now she is in need and had been a dual TAXPAYER for years...[which back then she had no control over the money taken outta her check]......it is HER fault that she is now a single parent.    As if NOTHING can happen to other taxpayers WHO may be in NEED some where down the line in their life  As if being a taxpayer allows one the "arrogant" self-entitlement to JUDGE other [taxpayers] unexpected circumstance.  

 

Unfortunately it seems that it has NEVER dawn on taxpayers that THERE IS A REASON why these human services EXIST in the first place.  And that our society SUPPOSEDLY is different from most pariarchal civilizations in that we [try] to take care of OUR people when they become in NEED..even though technically it is also THEIR tax dollars society uses to sustain the nation.  Wow!  If we cannot EMPATHIZE and offer COMPASSION to our OWN? [even while we SEE how other nations mistreat their people...especially the children?] we cannot UNDER any circumstance claim to be human.  Say whatcha want.  But that's just the bottom line.  But.  

Last edited by Kocolicious
Originally Posted by Kocolicious:

  So here comes the blame game in another form....so it's black mothers' fault that they have an option to take care of their families despite the absence of the father

 

+why are you calling it an option?  I  thought public aid was a safety net?  Isn't the purpose is to provide 'temporary aid for needy families'??

 

....it's black mothers' fault that they are NOT thrown under by our society like women/children are in so many other [patriarchal countries]  Okay I get it now.  

 

+no, it's the hoodrats fault for being failures and milking the system by living on the system

 

So the MAN who isn't required to wear a condom if he doesn't wanna...Ooops get a woman pregnant....had no intentions on sticking around in the first place...as a result of 2 second union...a baby is conceived....without the man in sight...the woman now has to decide if she wants to deliver a baby now that she's pregnant since it is SHE who allowed the man NOT to wear condom....so before and after the delivery it is SHE who decided to go to public assistance and get support for her new baby who by the way?  Didn't ask to be a part of this mess.    And because now she is in need and had been a dual TAXPAYER for years...[which back then she had no control over the money taken outta her check]......it is HER fault that she is now a single parent.    As if NOTHING can happen to other taxpayers WHO may be in NEED some where down the line in their life  As if being a taxpayer allows one the "arrogant" self-entitlement to JUDGE other [taxpayers] unexpected circumstance.  

 

+In your story above, you seemed to strangely exclude any responsibility that the woman has...like CHOOSING BETTER DUDES TO FOOK!! 

 

Unfortunately it seems that it has NEVER dawn on taxpayers that THERE IS A REASON why these human services EXIST in the first place.  And that our society SUPPOSEDLY is different from most pariarchal civilizations in that we [try] to take care of OUR people when they become in NEED..even though technically it is also THEIR tax dollars society uses to sustain the nation.  Wow!  If we cannot EMPATHIZE and offer COMPASSION to our OWN? [even while we SEE how other nations mistreat their people...especially the children?] we cannot UNDER any circumstance claim to be human.  Say whatcha want.  But that's just the bottom line.  But.  

 

+If the taxpayers are footing the bill, they should have a say in the life choices of those living on public aid.  that's all i am saying.  When citizen for or against gay marriage started the debate of the legality, the question was put on the ballot so. that. the. people. could. decide.

If a hoodrat feels the need to have a fifth child on public assistance, maybe the people should decide limits on the system.  it seems fair to me.  When my wife and I discussed family planning, we opted for three kids so that we can enjoy a comfortable lifestyle and provide our young with a great life. If we were not considering the cost, we could have had 15 kids too http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBqjZ0KZCa0

 

or why even get married, I could just leak life all over my city ... 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNohGQv9o9g

 

 Seems kinds normal, but then again, maybe not!!

 

Last edited by RadioRaheem
Originally Posted by RadioRaheem:
Originally Posted by sunnubian:
Originally Posted by RadioRaheem:
Originally Posted by sunnubian:

Who gets to decide whose "choice" is "bad"?

 

Mother's Day is for ALL mothers, even mothers who never actually gave birth, but adopted.   

+ I'll say the taxpayer.  Many of these 'strong, independent, Queen' single mothers are on public aid

 

Contrary to popular belief, the majority of them are not on any public aid, but for even those that are, what of all the non-Black women in America that are also on "public aid"?  Or the fact that most of these 'strong, independent, Queen' single mothers are taxpayers. Are you implying that only certain taxpayers should be the only ones to decide what is or is not a "bad choice"?  

 

Didn't our people live through this very thing in this country from reconstruction through jim crow, where even though they were also taxpayers, America's racists wanted to be the only ones calling all the shots.  

 

Haven't we already lived through centuries in this country where there were those [and still are] that deemed all Black people unworthy and a group that should be hated, oppressed, undermined, and annihilated.

 

So, you suggest that Black people should take on the same bigotry, hatred, and set out to deliberately scheme to hate and destroy a portion of our own group, which at last estimates, was around 70%.  

 

Some thing you don't get to decide for other people, some things you do not have the right to decide for other people, sometimes you are only cutting off your nose to spite your face.  

 

 

+ but many ARE on Public Aid, which includes Section 8 housing, food stamps, WIC vouchers, MedicAid, and Welfare checks.  Are you sure that a 'majority' don't receive help from ANY of these programs??  

 

 

 

"Many" are, just like "many" of all other racial groups in this country, but it has Never been ALL or the Majority of Black people or Black single mother.  

 

Just because the only media about such programs you see flashed across America's tv/news screens deliberately only show people from predominately Black areas or Black single mothers that are receiving such assistance, does not mean that the majority of Black people or the majority of Black single mothers are receiving such assistance.  

 

Don't let America's racist propaganda machine form your opinions of your own people for you.  

Originally Posted by sunnubian:
Originally Posted by RadioRaheem:
Originally Posted by sunnubian:
Originally Posted by RadioRaheem:
Originally Posted by sunnubian:

Who gets to decide whose "choice" is "bad"?

 

Mother's Day is for ALL mothers, even mothers who never actually gave birth, but adopted.   

+ I'll say the taxpayer.  Many of these 'strong, independent, Queen' single mothers are on public aid

 

Contrary to popular belief, the majority of them are not on any public aid, but for even those that are, what of all the non-Black women in America that are also on "public aid"?  Or the fact that most of these 'strong, independent, Queen' single mothers are taxpayers. Are you implying that only certain taxpayers should be the only ones to decide what is or is not a "bad choice"?  

 

Didn't our people live through this very thing in this country from reconstruction through jim crow, where even though they were also taxpayers, America's racists wanted to be the only ones calling all the shots.  

 

Haven't we already lived through centuries in this country where there were those [and still are] that deemed all Black people unworthy and a group that should be hated, oppressed, undermined, and annihilated.

 

So, you suggest that Black people should take on the same bigotry, hatred, and set out to deliberately scheme to hate and destroy a portion of our own group, which at last estimates, was around 70%.  

 

Some thing you don't get to decide for other people, some things you do not have the right to decide for other people, sometimes you are only cutting off your nose to spite your face.  

 

 

+ but many ARE on Public Aid, which includes Section 8 housing, food stamps, WIC vouchers, MedicAid, and Welfare checks.  Are you sure that a 'majority' don't receive help from ANY of these programs??  

 

 

 

"Many" are, just like "many" of all other racial groups in this country, but it has Never been ALL or the Majority of Black people or Black single mother.  

 

Just because the only media about such programs you see flashed across America's tv/news screens deliberately only show people from predominately Black areas or Black single mothers that are receiving such assistance, does not mean that the majority of Black people or the majority of Black single mothers are receiving such assistance.  

 

Don't let America's racist propaganda machine form your opinions of your own people for you.  

+ I'm from Baltimore, went to college in DC, and graduate school in the ATL...I don't need the media because I've seen it for myself.  

Originally Posted by RadioRaheem:
 

+ I'm from Baltimore, went to college in DC, and graduate school in the ATL...I don't need the media because I've seen it for myself.  

 

Atlanta, for example, has one of the largest most thriving Black middle classes in the country that are saturated throughout Atlanta and all of it's suburbs, where many of these homes are lived in/owned by working Black single mothers.

 

I'd lived in Atlanta for about eight years and I'd never even met but one Black single mother on welfare, etc., and she worked part-time.

 

I do know that they did exists, for example, I was told about a very large, notorious government housing project [that they have since torn down] that I'm sure housed a lot of people/single mothers receiving government assistance, but that was no where the vast majority of Black people or single mothers lived in Atlanta. 

 

I don't doubt what you have seen, but it appears that you are only looking at a small portion, by comparison, of a very large picture.   

Brotha RR wrote:  

 

+If the taxpayers are footing the bill, they should have a say in the life choices of those living on public aid.  

 

But that's AFTER the fact is what I'm saying.  Although I'm with cha about this with some women who stalk brothas for babies...I've heard of that.  Not crazy.  But all I'm saying since it's taypayers money after conducting sexual activity....use PROTECTION first....especially the MAN....then it will KILL two stones (1) No baby so brotha don't have to play a disappearing act and (2) No public aid since...brotha [i'ma gonna say for the nth time] DECIDED TO PUT ON THE CONDOM    I wonder why they just don't close this service altogether.  Why?  Maybe cuz America goes around SAVING every other country's starving and dying children...it would seem STRANGE not to do the same for its own starving and dying children.  

And that will happen if there are no services for children and families in need. 

 

.,,,that's all i am saying.  

 

We have starving children too.  Ain't their fault their parents are idiots.  

 

When citizen for or against gay marriage started the debate of the legality, the question was put on the ballot so. that. the. people. could. decide.

 

That's DIFFERENT.    This is JUST like they[gay] try to say that their rights are the same as having black rights.  Not!   The difference between being GAY and public assistance for needy children?  Apples and Oranges.  Whatcha wanna do?  Throw kids under the bus too?

 

 

If a hoodrat feels the need to have a fifth child on public assistance, maybe the people should decide limits on the system.  it seems fair to me.  

 

I agree.    I think the money should have been invested in educating young parents and giving their options on how to care for their children and earn a decent living.  A lotta times those hoodrats you refer to are young teens.  These agencies act like they are brain-dead and don't recognize that many of those on assistance are under skilled young adults with no clue as to how to take care of a baby or run a household.  We need to restructure the agency and put qualified people in charge of how these funds are allocated and how to encourage folks utilizing these services to wean off and earn a living.  It can be done.  I don't understand why it isn't.  

 

When my wife and I discussed family planning, we opted for three kids so that we can enjoy a comfortable lifestyle and provide our young with a great life.

 

First off...bravo to you and your wife for planning your family instead of just letting it happen.    I think that's awesome and SMART. Cuz it's NOTHING like a WANTED child. Wanted children beam through life with a phenomena glow and become super stars in whatever they choose to do.  And that's a fact.   

 

If we were not considering the cost, we could have had 15 kids too http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBqjZ0KZCa0

 

I do agree that there should be a limit of children on assistance and I think it should be a reasonable and common sense way to approach this epidemic.  But these geniuses have been sitting on their asses for three decades doing ABSOLUTELY nothing to mitigate this social problem.  We have social workers with degrees and the desire to help those on assistance-why the agencies haven't come up to date on this is beyond me.  It's like they DON'T wanna FIX this.

 

or why even get married, I could just leak life all over my city ... 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNohGQv9o9g

 

I'm thinking you got married cuz you FOUND the love of your life:  your soul mate and wanted a family with this person.  You don't SOUND like the kind of brotha who would have a multitude of baby mamas.  Just not your style and from what I've gathered about you through the years...having a lot of children that way is something that may be against the GRAIN of who you are.  I'm just assuming based on how I perceive you here on board.  But!  I could be wrong.   

 

 

Last edited by Kocolicious

Brotha RR wrote:  

+why are you calling it an option?  I  thought public aid was a safety net?  Isn't the purpose is to provide 'temporary aid for needy families'??

 

Okay my brotha.  You didn't hear what I said too well...so I'ma gonna REPEAT IT. 'K?    The mother will have an option to take care of her CHILD DESPITE the absent father.  Again...I will repeat...the mother who decided to deliver the child [born outta of both mom and dad NOT wearing a CONDOM] have an option to go to a place and receive food and funds for her baby.  And as I stated before most unwanted pregnancies/babies in the SYSTEM come from teen sexual activities.  Maybe that's why they evolve into hoodrats[your words].  

 

+no, it's the hoodrats fault for being failures and milking the system by living on the system

 

Okay.  Now why are they FAILURES my brotha?  And milking the system?  I think massa has MILKED us enough to the fact not only did this milking make AMERICA one of the richest countries in the world...but!  Allowed massa and Ms. Ann to hold power they never had in their OWN land.

 

+In your story above, you seemed to strangely exclude any responsibility that the woman has...like CHOOSING BETTER DUDES TO FOOK!! 

 

 

No I didn;t,  There's nothing strange about not caring for children...so in that my young brotha...,you're delusional.  Cuz if the woman was irresponsible once she discovered she's pregnant, she wouldn't have enough sense to go seek help for her unborn child the minute she realized that home dude wasn't gonna help support THEIR  baby.  Cuz left to home dude....the child not only would STARVED to death but also wouldn't receive infant care once he/she is born.  See?  The difference is home dude can ALWAYS walk away...but!  Home chick can't walk away from a pregnant stomach.  That's WHY condoms is a great gift that men should gift themselves like buying toothpaste.   But I KNOW you are NOT listening to a word I've said.  You are stuck on your man views.  But! Keep growing my brotha,...you'll get there....and when you do then we can have lunch and discuss what you missed in my commentary.  'k?  But

Last edited by Kocolicious

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×