I think the two juxtaposed to each other makes for a very interesting argument.
Namely is it "just" to murder in defense of ones idea liberty?
Was John Brown a terrorist?
Original Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Is it "just" to murder in defense of one's idea [of] liberty? Simply put no.
It may be just to kill for one's own freedom.
It may be just to kill for one's own freedom.
Kweli, please explain the difference...
This is a very interesting thread. I think that in some respects, one might suggest that Brown's was an assault on a military target, the federal arsenal at Harper's Ferry, the goal being the acquisition of weapons for a slave revolt. He was (unfortunately) not successful.
This led me to ask might a better analogy with Osama be the slave revolts themselves, folks like Gabriel Prosser, Denmark Vesey, and Nat Turner. If memory serves me correct, at least in the case of Turner, they attempted to kill any white person they encountered - male or female, child or adult.
Was that a terrorist act? Again, I don't think so. As for Osama, I really have ambiguous feelings. As I have said before, my first response on the morning of 9/11 was that this was a case of "chickens coming home to roost" and while I feel for the families that lost loved ones, I still feel that way.
This led me to ask might a better analogy with Osama be the slave revolts themselves, folks like Gabriel Prosser, Denmark Vesey, and Nat Turner. If memory serves me correct, at least in the case of Turner, they attempted to kill any white person they encountered - male or female, child or adult.
Was that a terrorist act? Again, I don't think so. As for Osama, I really have ambiguous feelings. As I have said before, my first response on the morning of 9/11 was that this was a case of "chickens coming home to roost" and while I feel for the families that lost loved ones, I still feel that way.
ter·ror·ism ( P ) Pronunciation Key (tr-rzm)
n.
The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.
ter·ror·ist ( P ) Pronunciation Key (trr-st)
n.
One that engages in acts or an act of terrorism.
John Brown is a terrorist, according to the definition...... Matter of fact, many good people throughout history are/were terrorist........
n.
The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.
ter·ror·ist ( P ) Pronunciation Key (trr-st)
n.
One that engages in acts or an act of terrorism.
John Brown is a terrorist, according to the definition...... Matter of fact, many good people throughout history are/were terrorist........
quote:Originally posted by Sweetwuzzy:
ter·ror·ism ( P ) Pronunciation Key (tr-rzm)
n.
The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.
ter·ror·ist ( P ) Pronunciation Key (trr-st)
n.
One that engages in acts or an act of terrorism.
John Brown is a terrorist, according to the definition...... Matter of fact, many good people throughout history are/were terrorist........
i.e. George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, etc.
quote:Originally posted by MBM:quote:Originally posted by Sweetwuzzy:
ter·ror·ism ( P ) Pronunciation Key (tr-rzm)
n.
The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.
ter·ror·ist ( P ) Pronunciation Key (trr-st)
n.
One that engages in acts or an act of terrorism.
John Brown is a terrorist, according to the definition...... Matter of fact, many good people throughout history are/were terrorist........
i.e. George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, etc.
Correct, but George Washington, Tom Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin were not good people!! lol..........
quote:just" to murder in defense of one's idea [of] liberty? Simply put no.
Hmmmmm Let us see.
A few months ago Iraqi electrical workers held a street protest to demand more security for their fellow workers.
There has been an assult on Iraqi electrial line men who are attempting to restore or provide electricity in all parts of Iraq.
Several of their brothers have been SHOT DEAD while they were atop an electrical pole by a Freedom Fighter with a machine gun shooting up at them.
These people were not collaborating with the USA. They were simply attempting to improve the standard of living for the families living in the country.
Please justify the act of shooting an electrical worker while he is atop a pole as a fight for FREEDOM?
quote:Originally posted by Constructive Feedback:quote:just" to murder in defense of one's idea [of] liberty? Simply put no.
Hmmmmm Let us see.
A few months ago Iraqi electrical workers held a street protest to demand more security for their fellow workers.
There has been an assult on Iraqi electrial line men who are attempting to restore or provide electricity in all parts of Iraq.
Several of their brothers have been SHOT DEAD while they were atop an electrical pole by a Freedom Fighter with a machine gun shooting up at them.
These people were not collaborating with the USA. They were simply attempting to improve the standard of living for the families living in the country.
Please justify the act of shooting an electrical worker while he is atop a pole as a fight for FREEDOM?
This story is an example of bad terrorism........
The African National Congress(ANC) used terrorism- this is a fight for FREEDOM !!!
This is an example of BAD (as in pathetically poor) reasoning/questioning.quote:Please justify the act of shooting an electrical worker while he is atop a pole as a fight for FREEDOM?
Ummm... who made the argument that indiscriminate killings committed by Iraqi "insurgents" were examples of courageous acts of FREEDOM FIGHTERS? I mean, you did call for someone to "justify" that... Who in the HELL was your DUMB ASS talking to?
More importantly, whose point, whose position were you talking about? Talking to? WHO NEEDED TO JUSTIFY that shit you wrote?
Hmmmm.... given NO ONE ever suggested "insurgents" in Iraq who kill non-colloborating Iraqi public workers are FREEDOM FIGHTERS... STFU!!!! Say something that's actually relevant and can be contended if you're going to pose like someone has to "justify" shit (that hasn't even been said).
You're a fuckin' loon!
NCONTINENCE:
Pay close attention to the condemnations from Farrahkan and other politically biased Muslims.
They tend to focus on the actions of the USA in "killing Muslims". During his recent speech, however, Farrahkan said NOTHING about the indiscriminate bombings and killings of INNOCENT IRAQIS by the INSURGENTS.
The electrical workers, Iraqi's waiting in line for employment, police recruits waiting in line, truck drivers transporting needed supplies to IRAQI PEOPLE have all be targets. HOW CAN THEY BE SAID TO BE HELPING THE AMERICANS?
CLEARLY they are attempting to distroy the move toward peace in Iraq by perpetuating terrorism upon the PEOPLE OF IRAQ so that the newly ELECTED government won't be able to impose it's rule and order.
NCONTINENCE - you are proving yourself to be a FLEA STUCK TO MY AZZ to those on the board who have the OBJECTIVITY to read your posts. You are in your late 20's, early 30's. How about ACTING accordingly?
Pay close attention to the condemnations from Farrahkan and other politically biased Muslims.
They tend to focus on the actions of the USA in "killing Muslims". During his recent speech, however, Farrahkan said NOTHING about the indiscriminate bombings and killings of INNOCENT IRAQIS by the INSURGENTS.
The electrical workers, Iraqi's waiting in line for employment, police recruits waiting in line, truck drivers transporting needed supplies to IRAQI PEOPLE have all be targets. HOW CAN THEY BE SAID TO BE HELPING THE AMERICANS?
CLEARLY they are attempting to distroy the move toward peace in Iraq by perpetuating terrorism upon the PEOPLE OF IRAQ so that the newly ELECTED government won't be able to impose it's rule and order.
NCONTINENCE - you are proving yourself to be a FLEA STUCK TO MY AZZ to those on the board who have the OBJECTIVITY to read your posts. You are in your late 20's, early 30's. How about ACTING accordingly?
Damn, I must have missed Farrakhan Et Al contributing, posting on this thread. Me paying close attention and all... I must have slipped, looked away, blinked for too long or something.quote:Pay close attention to the condemnations from Farrahkan and other politically biased Muslims.
The Date & Time Farrkhan Et Al posted on this thread, CF?
How do you pose questions that have NO BEARING or relevance to the topics and perspective being discussed?quote:HOW CAN THEY BE SAID TO BE HELPING THE AMERICANS?
No one has said "they" are or can be said to be helping the Americans. Whoever the hell you're talking about... because nobody but you has presented ideas about Iraq.
Again, nobody but you has presented ideas about Iraq yet you keep posing questions as if someone has:quote:CLEARLY they are attempting to distroy the move toward peace in Iraq by perpetuating terrorism upon the PEOPLE OF IRAQ...
[1] Tried to "justify" the acts of "insurgents"... HERE; and
[2] Said that the "insurgents" are "helping the Americans"...
How about saying something ON TOPIC? without trying, fruitlessly, to change the topic and in STRAW MAN like fashion, trying to set up your opponents arguments by creating arguments for them.quote:How about ACTING accordingly?
WHO WERE YOU TALKING TO? Simple question...
WTF are you talking about? Who suggested that? Simple questions... DON'T SHRINK!!
Nmaginate; what does STFU mean?
C-Feed does have a penchant for changing the subject matter.
If I could give an anology of how C-Feed "argues" this would be it exactly...
Question: When was the War of 1812?
C-Feed's Answer/Response: Green...
C-Feed does have a penchant for changing the subject matter.
If I could give an anology of how C-Feed "argues" this would be it exactly...
Question: When was the War of 1812?
C-Feed's Answer/Response: Green...
Address of John Brown to the Virginia Court at Charles Town, Virginia on November 2, 1859
I have, may it please the court, a few words to say.
In the first place, I deny everything but what I have all along admitted, -- the design on my part to free slaves. I intended certainly to have made a clean thing of that matter, as I did last winter, when I went into Missouri and took slaves without the snapping of a gun on either side, moved them through the country, and finally left them in Canada. I designed to do the same thing again, on a larger scale. That was all I intended. I never did intend murder, or treason, or the destruction of property, or to excite or incite slaves to rebellion, or to make insurrection.
I have another objection; and that is, it is unjust that I should suffer a penalty. Had I interfered in the manner which I admit, and which I admit has been fairly proved (for I admire the truthfulness and candor of the greater portion of the witnesses who have testified in this case), -- had I so interfered on behalf of the rich, the powerful, the intelligent, the so-called great, or on behalf of any of their friends -- either father, mother, sister, wife, or children, or any of that class -- and suffered and sacrificed what I have in this interference, it would have been all right; and every man in this court would have deemed it an act worthy of reward rather than punishment.
The court acknowledges, as I suppose, the validity of the law of God. I see a book kissed here which I suppose to be a Bible, or at least the New Testament. That teaches me that all things whatsoever I would that men should do to me, I should do even so to them. It teaches me further to "remember them that are in bonds, as bound with them." I endeavored to act up to that instruction. I say, I am too young to understand that God is any respecter of persons. I believe that to have interfered as I have done -- as I have always freely admitted I have done -- in behalf of Gods despied poor, was not wrong, but right. Now if it is deemed necessary that I should forfeit my life for the furtherance of the ends of justice, and mingle my blood further with the blood of my children and with the blood of millions in this slave country whose rights are disregarded by wicked, cruel, and unjust enactments. -- I submit; so let it be done!
Let me say one word further.
I feel entirely satisfied with the treatment I have received on my trial. Considering all the circumstances, it has been more generous than I expected. I feel no consciousness of my guilt. I have stated from the first what was my intention, and what was not. I never had any design against the life of any person, nor any disposition to commit treason, or excite slaves to rebel, or make any general insurrection. I never encouraged any man to do so, but always discouraged any idea of any kind.
Let me say also, a word in regard to the statements made by some to those conncected with me. I hear it has been said by some of them that I have induced them to join me. But the contrary is true. I do not say this to injure them, but as regretting their weakness. There is not one of them but joined me of his own accord, and the greater part of them at their own expense. A number of them I never saw, and never had a word of conversation with, till the day they came to me; and that was for the purpose I have stated.
Now I have done.
I have, may it please the court, a few words to say.
In the first place, I deny everything but what I have all along admitted, -- the design on my part to free slaves. I intended certainly to have made a clean thing of that matter, as I did last winter, when I went into Missouri and took slaves without the snapping of a gun on either side, moved them through the country, and finally left them in Canada. I designed to do the same thing again, on a larger scale. That was all I intended. I never did intend murder, or treason, or the destruction of property, or to excite or incite slaves to rebellion, or to make insurrection.
I have another objection; and that is, it is unjust that I should suffer a penalty. Had I interfered in the manner which I admit, and which I admit has been fairly proved (for I admire the truthfulness and candor of the greater portion of the witnesses who have testified in this case), -- had I so interfered on behalf of the rich, the powerful, the intelligent, the so-called great, or on behalf of any of their friends -- either father, mother, sister, wife, or children, or any of that class -- and suffered and sacrificed what I have in this interference, it would have been all right; and every man in this court would have deemed it an act worthy of reward rather than punishment.
The court acknowledges, as I suppose, the validity of the law of God. I see a book kissed here which I suppose to be a Bible, or at least the New Testament. That teaches me that all things whatsoever I would that men should do to me, I should do even so to them. It teaches me further to "remember them that are in bonds, as bound with them." I endeavored to act up to that instruction. I say, I am too young to understand that God is any respecter of persons. I believe that to have interfered as I have done -- as I have always freely admitted I have done -- in behalf of Gods despied poor, was not wrong, but right. Now if it is deemed necessary that I should forfeit my life for the furtherance of the ends of justice, and mingle my blood further with the blood of my children and with the blood of millions in this slave country whose rights are disregarded by wicked, cruel, and unjust enactments. -- I submit; so let it be done!
Let me say one word further.
I feel entirely satisfied with the treatment I have received on my trial. Considering all the circumstances, it has been more generous than I expected. I feel no consciousness of my guilt. I have stated from the first what was my intention, and what was not. I never had any design against the life of any person, nor any disposition to commit treason, or excite slaves to rebel, or make any general insurrection. I never encouraged any man to do so, but always discouraged any idea of any kind.
Let me say also, a word in regard to the statements made by some to those conncected with me. I hear it has been said by some of them that I have induced them to join me. But the contrary is true. I do not say this to injure them, but as regretting their weakness. There is not one of them but joined me of his own accord, and the greater part of them at their own expense. A number of them I never saw, and never had a word of conversation with, till the day they came to me; and that was for the purpose I have stated.
Now I have done.
quote:Nmaginate; what does STFU mean?
SHUT THE F@%K UP!!
For someone who loves to completely change the subject, never address what's being said and acts completely oblivious to the CONTEXT... What Else Can You Say?
quote:For someone who loves to completely change the subject, never address what's being said and acts completely oblivious to the CONTEXT...
Damn.....I couldn't have said that schit better myself......some distinct azz behavioral patterns.....wow
by Nmaginatequote:Kweli, please explain the difference...
I have not completely thought this one through; however, I draw a distinction between killing to defend one's own life and/or rights. However, I find it problematic for, in the above example, John Brown-a white man- to kill in opposition to an institution that does not threaten his life or liberty...an institution for which he is ultimately a beneficiary by virtue of his whiteness.
If the latter was the case, we would live in a state of chaos. Individuals would be justified in taking arms in defense of any group that they perceived to have been wronged, regardless of whether the wrong touches them personally.
KWELI??quote:Individuals would be justified in taking arms in defense of any group that they perceived to have been wronged, regardless of whether the wrong touches them personally.
Why must an individual be "personally" affected or impacted? That doesn't sound like a prescription for the Beloved Society. In fact, that's tantamount to justifying RACISM, let alone the most perversed individualistic "It's All About Me" type of mentality.
Now, I really don't understand that.
You say there would be chaos... But your notion of "justification", in race terms, legitimizes Segregation and discrimination... or at least the callous disregard.
"I wasn't wronged!"
"Tough shit! Deal with it!"
Huh?
blaqfist:
What you are witnessing in my responses is my breaking from the FALSE DICHOTOMY that is presented by many of people's questions or statements.
For example the CLAIM that White folk's love for Southern culture means that they are all RACISTS and seek to return back to the Antibellum period.
I would ask you about, for example the promotion of the "Dirty South" and ask you if this representation of the South has a similary insidious undertone? In doing so YOU would call my question - OFF TRACK.
So often the position of the FUNDEMENTALIST can be refuted if you ask the reverse question of his definitive statement.
The fact that some of you are used to PONTIFICATING rather than debating you take offense to my questioning or challenging you. I understand dude. For so long in the past you have been able to use anger, outrage and frustration to defend against any challenges to your ideology. I am not seeking he approval of any of you - only asking you to justify YOUR positions. In thinking about this in this way MAYBE you will come up with stronger arugments.
What you are witnessing in my responses is my breaking from the FALSE DICHOTOMY that is presented by many of people's questions or statements.
For example the CLAIM that White folk's love for Southern culture means that they are all RACISTS and seek to return back to the Antibellum period.
I would ask you about, for example the promotion of the "Dirty South" and ask you if this representation of the South has a similary insidious undertone? In doing so YOU would call my question - OFF TRACK.
So often the position of the FUNDEMENTALIST can be refuted if you ask the reverse question of his definitive statement.
The fact that some of you are used to PONTIFICATING rather than debating you take offense to my questioning or challenging you. I understand dude. For so long in the past you have been able to use anger, outrage and frustration to defend against any challenges to your ideology. I am not seeking he approval of any of you - only asking you to justify YOUR positions. In thinking about this in this way MAYBE you will come up with stronger arugments.
DUDE!!! DUMBASS DUDE!!!quote:For example the CLAIM that White folk's love for Southern culture means that they are all RACISTS and seek to return back to the Antibellum period.
This is a thread "dichotomizing" JOHN BROWN vs. OSAMA BIN LADEN.
Now, John Brown he was White and, arguably, "racist" to an extent despite his raid. But.... WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT POSER?
Funny how you use the term... but you're the one with the most Black/White, EITHER OR type of thinking on this damn board.quote:So often the position of the FUNDEMENTALIST can be refuted if you ask the reverse question of his definitive statement.
When you figure out which thread you're on... call me!
Also note, you have just described the techiques of the Intellectually NONgifted. Perhaps you read that shit in a book somewhere and now you follow it like the mark (and POSER) you are.
"Dirty South"? Southern (Confederate) Pride?
Yeah!! I do see the comparison....
Both have a similar history and there are DIRTY SOUTH rallies/parades all the time with all types of comparable SYMBOLS.... lol
PROOF once more that you are a DEPTHLESS WONDER!!
So what does this say about you and all the damn whining and crying you do about me and MY CHALLENGES to you?quote:The fact that some of you are used to PONTIFICATING rather than debating you take offense to my questioning or challenging you. I understand dude.
You keep posing, posturing and PONTIFICATING but yet you still continue to SHRINK when challenged. What's your excuse?
And on that, I have witnessed MAJOR SHRINKAGE from you... over and over and over and over...quote:I am not seeking he approval of any of you - only asking you to justify YOUR positions.
Seriously? When have you JUSTIFIED any on your positions? WHEN??
... In other words, STFU!!!
CF? Do you really want me, us to go down that long list of WEAK rhetorical devices you employ as you SHRINK and try to avoid the blatant CONTRADICTIONS and the patented DEPTHLESSNESS of your positions?quote:For so long in the past you have been able to use anger, outrage and frustration to defend against any challenges to your ideology.
Really?
quote:"Dirty South"? Southern (Confederate) Pride?
The original post did not say "Confederate Pride" it said "Southern Pride".
YES "Dirty South" represents Black SOUTHERN CULTURE.
quote:Originally posted by Constructive Feedback:quote:"Dirty South"? Southern (Confederate) Pride?
The original post did not say "Confederate Pride" it said "Southern Pride".
YES "Dirty South" represents Black SOUTHERN CULTURE.
No, this thread is about terrorism, particularly framed in terms of a comparison between John Brown and Osama Bin Laden. You are
.
I know CF is one of those Negative Attention guys... but this is just ridiculous! 
Damn ya'll need to be separated and spanked.
May I have another lick Ma'am?quote:Damn ya'll need to be separated and spanked.
ANYTIME
CF is quick to call black azz entertainment based on ignorance and promiscuity black culture.....this self-hating negro paints black people in the most disparaging way he can all the time......we are just dumb, criminal, sambos and the whole nine..kinda like a palatable version of that other fool whose name I refuse to call.....but he does not even realize that his descriptions of black people and the punitive stance he takes on policy issues is a clear indicator that something internal is going on with him......he has issues that are apparent when he speaks...but he is too engrossed into trying to become better at it to recognize the error (maybe intentional) of his ways.....man I hate self-loathing negroes.....
CONSTRUCTIVE FEED~:
"I'm getting tired of kickin' your ass!"
But it's so damn fun!!
Also... Southern (Confederate) Pride... You are PARENTHETICALLY ILLITERATE!!
Despite BEING ON THE WRONG THREAD (which may be a tolerable mistake...), you can't even get this shit right!!quote:The original post did not say "Confederate Pride" it said "Southern Pride".
Like I said:quote:
"I'm getting tired of kickin' your ass!"
But it's so damn fun!!
Also... Southern (Confederate) Pride... You are PARENTHETICALLY ILLITERATE!!
quote:CF is quick to call black azz entertainment based on ignorance and promiscuity black culture.....this self-hating negro paints black people in the most disparaging way he can all the time
Not so, my friend. The Black people who YOU are silent up on as you go after BLACK CONSERVATIVES do all of this for me. I just sit back and say "Forgive them Lord for they know not what they do".
http://www.blackstarnews.com/?c=135&a=1546&sid=c34d05b2...e06a474297319cb61d97
The main people who you SHOULD BE attacking because they are dragging us down YOU ARE SILENT UPON. You seem them as VICTIMS.
I want to work to be your VICTIM Kevin. This way I will escape your CONDEMNATION for any thought that I have that you deem harmful. What do I need to do to be labeled your vicitm Kevin? (No doubt it starts with ceasing my questioning of you and getting DOWN WITH THE PROGRAM, but that is a given
).
Did you get that picture from stormfront.org?
quote:Originally posted by Constructive Feedback:quote:CF is quick to call black azz entertainment based on ignorance and promiscuity black culture.....this self-hating negro paints black people in the most disparaging way he can all the time
Not so, my friend. The Black people who YOU are silent up on as you go after BLACK CONSERVATIVES do all of this for me. I just sit back and say "Forgive them Lord for they know not what they do".
http://www.blackstarnews.com/?c=135&a=1546&sid=c34d05b2...e06a474297319cb61d97
The main people who you SHOULD BE attacking because they are dragging us down YOU ARE SILENT UPON. You seem them as VICTIMS.
I want to work to be your VICTIM Kevin. This way I will escape your CONDEMNATION for any thought that I have that you deem harmful. What do I need to do to be labeled your vicitm Kevin? (No doubt it starts with ceasing my questioning of you and getting DOWN WITH THE PROGRAM, but that is a given
Yep...blkCons speak as of racism as if it does not exist and adversely affect the lives of black people......even though there is factual data to the contrary.......they(blkCons) turn racism around and make it seem as if blacks are making excuses for their own shortcomings........because that kind of behavior on the part of the negro pleases white people........
quote:Originally posted by Huey:
Did you get that picture from stormfront.org?
No. Sadly it is a REAL PICTURE from Africans who were influenced by AMERICAN SAMBOS to use this name. A Black American cyclist riding the length of the continent spotted this store along his journey.
Huey:
Think about this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In YOUR response you TARGET ME!!!!!!!!!!!
You say NOTHING about the AMERICAN SAMBOS who have motivated these people who live in a different culture to use a word that MEANS NOTHING TO THEM but is offensive to Black Americans. They got this from listening to the music and the images of these AMERICAN SAMBOS.
BUT AGAIN YOU TARGET ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Think about how warped and MISDIRECTED your swipe at me is.
quote:Originally posted by Constructive Feedback:quote:Originally posted by Huey:
Did you get that picture from stormfront.org?
No. Sadly it is a REAL PICTURE from Africans who were influenced by AMERICAN SAMBOS to use this name. A Black American cyclist riding the length of the continent spotted this store along his journey.
Huey:
Think about this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In YOUR response you TARGET ME!!!!!!!!!!!
You say NOTHING about the AMERICAN SAMBOS who have motivated these people who live in a different culture to use a word that MEANS NOTHING TO THEM but is offensive to Black Americans. They got this from listening to the music and the images of these AMERICAN SAMBOS.
BUT AGAIN YOU TARGET ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Think about how warped and MISDIRECTED your swipe at me is.
**How is asking you a question about where you got a picture from targeting you or taking a swipe at you? But you accuse me of thinking like a VICTIM.....ha ha, that is funny...
*I agree of that came from black people here (what you have not proven, just stated) it is a social tragedy....but it still does not compare to blkCON efforts to disenfranchise millionsof black people educationally and professionally......only the predatory criminal, murderer and gang banger is probably more detremental to the race.......than the blkCON...or whatever they like to call themselves...right-wing blacks, whatever the f-k they choose, their ideology masks the conservatives on the right....if they do not realize that, not only are they tommin....they are real stupid toms.......geesh....
quote:No. Sadly it is a REAL PICTURE from Africans who were influenced by AMERICAN SAMBOS to use this name. A Black American cyclist riding the length of the continent spotted this store along his journey.
I hear ya..i'll take it you are referring to black people when you use the word SAMBO....because I know damn well a white person would never use the word nigger in africa....even when they picked up slaves, they addressed them as "maa'm" and "sir".......
quote:I agree of that came from black people here (what you have not proven, just stated) it is a social tragedy
Clearly you didn't read the article and click on the BLACK AMERICAN CYCLISTS blog.
I was presented this information on another message board just as YOU received it from me.
And as soon as you got that info. you proved your LOFTON-esque tendencies. Of course, that was so relevant and fitting for the CONTEXT of this thread...
**Wondering why it seems like the moment ya'll open your mouths, all the Issues & Politics threads mesh into a gargantuan, argumentative debate in which the majority of you men can't stay on topic for the life of you**
Thanks for that very sexist remark.
quote:Originally posted by Nmaginate:
Thanks for that very sexist remark.
Hey I'm on your side, quit trippin'
