Skip to main content

I don't know what you mean...hell I keep saying the same thing over and over for the remedial brother who has problems comprehending a specific question. Hell if he is any indicator of what blk comprehension is, this race is fucked. I ask him about the motivation of blkcons and people who take a certain position on a topic that is all..he answers with unrelated bullschit like how ineffective the policy is, how emphasis needs to be placed on kids, why my thinking is small and limited....now a f-king chimp can see that those answers do not relate to what was asked....but CF cannot...I would love to debate him live...because ignorance gets a pass online....where one can say shit and duck and dodge like they would not be allowed to with a moderator...but that is why blkCons only talk rhetoric that is WHAT should be done, not HOW...and cannot logically justify the things they do without admitting deference to white racists...they are an anomaly for real.......
quote:
but that is why blkCons only talk rhetoric that is WHAT should be done, not HOW...and cannot logically justify the things they do without admitting deference to white racists...they are an anomaly for real.......



As a result, it is entertaining to watch them duck and dodge but no one takes em serious..not even the racists that use them against other blacks....they despise house negroes because they have no backbone, yet they are useful for taking the white face off of racist thought and ideology.....
quote:
I ask him about the motivation of blkcons and people who take a certain position on a topic that is all



I see YOU have difficulty with this one:

"Are the MAXIMUM number of Black students attempting to go to college under the educational system of today? How is Affirmative Action correcting this situation?"
quote:
I see YOU have difficulty with this one:

"Are the MAXIMUM number of Black students attempting to go to college under the educational system of today? How is Affirmative Action correcting this situation?"
I see you have problems with coming forth with CONCRETE DATA, solid projections, etc. in support of the things your advocate.

You are ON THE CLOCK!!!
quote:
Originally posted by Constructive Feedback:
quote:
I ask him about the motivation of blkcons and people who take a certain position on a topic that is all



I see YOU have difficulty with this one:

"Are the MAXIMUM number of Black students attempting to go to college under the educational system of today? How is Affirmative Action correcting this situation?"




*You do not answer a question with a question, but it is funny to watch you jump over the lowered numbers your ilk cannot address why you support, but want to reference a MAXIMUM number instead.....how are you going to put the horse before the cart? You are like the racist whites that call affirmative action reverse racism without acknowledging racism as the status quo.....that is what it would have to be since AA was a corrective measure in the first place.....AA INCREASED black college enrollment and professional attainment......your ilk supported the decrease in black college enrollment through AA repeals, but want to speak about a maximum number....which is diametrically opposed to the results of your actions and what you stand for.....I can tell the way you talk to me that you inherently believe black people are dumb and inferior.....

that was real dumb CF....plus you never answered the motivation question directly or better yet,"if you had to vote to KEEP or REPEAL AA, which ONE would you select?
quote:
What you are witnessing in my responses is my breaking from the FALSE DICHOTOMY that is presented by many of people's questions or statements.

For example the CLAIM that White folk's love for Southern culture means that they are all RACISTS and seek to return back to the Antibellum period.

I would ask you about, for example the promotion of the "Dirty South" and ask you if this representation of the South has a similary insidious undertone? In doing so YOU would call my question - OFF TRACK.

So often the position of the FUNDEMENTALIST can be refuted if you ask the reverse question of his definitive statement.

The fact that some of you are used to PONTIFICATING rather than debating you take offense to my questioning or challenging you. I understand dude. For so long in the past you have been able to use anger, outrage and frustration to defend against any challenges to your ideology. I am not seeking he approval of any of you - only asking you to justify YOUR positions. In thinking about this in this way MAYBE you will come up with stronger arugments.


Anybody ever see the movie "The Brother from Another Planet."?

C-Feed; STFU!

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×