Skip to main content

I just discovered this and it's a couple of months away but since sci-fi is about the future anyway:

http://www2.avatarmovie.com/

everything-we-know-about-james-camerons-avatar/

The trailer looks really cool. I think it beats the hell out of the Star Trek reboot already. I'm a science fiction fan not a Star Trek fan.

um
Original Post
OK, I saw Avatar 3-D yesterday.

I didn't see it at an IMAX theater but I was surprisingly impressed by the 3-D effects.  A few months ago I was at a computer show for vendors and watched a 3-D demonstration using electronic glasses that blinked polarized lenses as shutters.  Whatever method was used in Avatar used glasses but not electronic ones.  The effect however was as good as I recall seeing at that computer show and the screen was WAY BIGGER.

The movie was like a combination of Vietnam, Dances with Wolves, Aliens and Fern Gully.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferngully

Heavy on the Fern Gully.

http://www.thedailytube.com/vi...-presents-fern-gully

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...eature=youtube_gdata

It totally blows away Star Trek which had nothing to say and beats it for effects.  I am going to go again soon which I haven't done for any movie since The Matrix.  That was 10 years 9 1/2 months ago.

http://www.cinemablend.com/new...ee-Avatar-16208.html

psik
Last edited {1}
Reference:
I don't know why but my wife and I said the same thing when we came out......"white arrogance" Looked like Africa, Australia, North America and other parts of the world to me.
This is why I could easily see there being a divide on this picture along the White/Non-White lines all over the world.  My complaint about Black Americans is that they don't see it as a technological issue.  It is more about who had and knew the technology over the last 500 years than it is about race.

But it seems this theme has appeared in sci-fi numerous times since the 60s and it is velly intelesting how similar some of it is to the movie.

http://www.darkroastedblend.co...es-of-avatar-in.html

Xum
Reference:
Xumbrarchist B3 · 64 Forum PostsDecember 29, 2009 1:45 PM (Edited: ) Reference: If your professional reputation and ability to eat depended upon photographs, you'd be sorta protective of your ish too ... It was just an old picture of helicopters from Vietnam. I seriously doubt that anyone's livelihood depended on it.

The photo is probably not producing a large fortune for anybody. But photographers can receive royalties from the use of such images. Especially on ones that are rare or hard to come by. It falls under intellectual property. Anyway .... it was a great movie ... I've already seen it twice ... I don't think I've done that since the Matrix. I might go see it a third ....

When Will White People Stop Making Movies Like "Avatar"?

{{{ Critics have called alien epic Avatar a version of Dances With Wolves because it's about a white guy going native and becoming a great leader. But Avatar is just the latest scifi rehash of an old white guilt fantasy. Spoilers...

Whether Avatar is racist is a matter for debate. Regardless of where you come down on that question, it's undeniable that the film - like alien apartheid flick District 9, released earlier this year - is emphatically a fantasy about race. Specifically, it's a fantasy about race told from the point of view of white people. Avatar and scifi films like it give us the opportunity to answer the question: What do white people fantasize about when they fantasize about racial identity?  }}}

http://io9.com/5422666/when-will-white-people-stop-making-movies-like-avatar

 

Xum

'Avatar' Critics See Racist Theme



Near the end of the hit film "Avatar," the villain snarls at the hero, "How does it feel to betray your own race?" Both men are white – although the hero is inhabiting a blue-skinned, 9-foot-tall, long-tailed alien.

Strange as it may seem for a film that pits greedy, immoral humans against noble denizens of a faraway moon, "Avatar" is being criticized by a small but vocal group of people who allege it contains racist themes – the white hero once again saving the primitive natives.

Since the film opened to widespread critical acclaim three weeks ago, hundreds of blog posts, newspaper articles, tweets and YouTube videos have said things such as the film is "a fantasy about race told from the point of view of white people" and that it reinforces "the white Messiah fable."

The film's writer and director, James Cameron, says the real theme is about respecting others' differences.

In the film (read no further if you don't want the plot spoiled for you) a white, paralyzed Marine, Jake Sully, is mentally linked to an alien's body and set loose on the planet Pandora. His mission: persuade the mystic, nature-loving Na'vi to make way for humans to mine their land for unobtanium, worth $20 million per kilo back home.

Like Kevin Costner in "Dances with Wolves" and Tom Cruise in "The Last Samurai" or as far back as Jimmy Stewart in the 1950 Western "Broken Arrow," Sully soon switches sides. He falls in love with the Na'vi princess and leads the bird-riding, bow-and-arrow-shooting aliens to victory over the white men's spaceships and mega-robots.

Adding to the racial dynamic is that the main Na'vi characters are played by actors of color, led by a Dominican, Zoe Saldana, as the princess. The film also is an obvious metaphor for how European settlers in America wiped out the Indians.

Robinne Lee, an actress in such recent films as "Seven Pounds" and "Hotel for Dogs," said that "Avatar" was "beautiful" and that she understood the economic logic of casting a white lead if most of the audience is white.
But she said the film, which so far has the second-highest worldwide box-office gross ever, still reminded her of Hollywood's "Pocahontas" story – "the Indian woman leads the white man into the wilderness, and he learns the way of the people and becomes the savior."

"It's really upsetting in many ways," said Lee, who is black with Jamaican and Chinese ancestry. "It would be nice if we could save ourselves."

Annalee Newitz, editor-in-chief of the sci-fi Web site io9.com, likened "Avatar" to the recent film "District 9," in which a white man accidentally becomes an alien and then helps save them, and 1984's "Dune," in which a white man becomes an alien Messiah.

"Main white characters realize that they are complicit in a system which is destroying aliens, AKA people of color ... (then) go beyond assimilation and become leaders of the people they once oppressed," she wrote.

"When will whites stop making these movies and start thinking about race in a new way?" wrote Newitz, who is white.

Black film professor and author Donald Bogle said he can understand why people would be troubled by "Avatar," although he praised it as a "stunning" work.

"A segment of the audience is carrying in the back of its head some sense of movie history," said Bogle, author of "Toms, Coons, Mulattoes, Mammies & Bucks: An Interpretive History of Blacks in American Films."

Bogle stopped short, however, of calling the movie racist.

"It's a film with still a certain kind of distortion," he said. "It's a movie that hasn't yet freed itself of old Hollywood traditions, old formulas."

Writer/director Cameron, who is white, said in an e-mail to The Associated Press that his film "asks us to open our eyes and truly see others, respecting them even though they are different, in the hope that we may find a way to prevent conflict and live more harmoniously on this world. I hardly think that is a racist message."

There are many ways to interpret the art that is "Avatar."

What does it mean that in the final, sequel-begging scene, Sully abandons his human body and transforms into one of the Na'vi for good? Is Saldana's Na'vi character the real heroine because she, not Sully, kills the arch-villain? Does it matter that many conservatives are riled by what they call liberal environmental and anti-military messages?

Is Cameron actually exposing the historical evils of white colonizers? Does the existence of an alien species expose the reality that all humans are actually one race?

"Can't people just enjoy movies any more?" a person named Michelle posted on the Web site for Essence, the magazine for black women, which had 371 comments on a story debating the issue.

Although the "Avatar" debate springs from Hollywood's historical difficulties with race, Will Smith recently saved the planet in "I Am Legend," and Denzel Washington appears ready to do the same in the forthcoming "Book of Eli."

Bogle, the film historian, said that he was glad Cameron made the film and that it made people think about race.

"Maybe there is something he does want to say and put across" about race, Bogle said. "Maybe if he had a black hero in there, that point would have been even stronger."


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...-theme_n_418155.html

{{{  Bogle, the film historian, said that he was glad Cameron made the film and that it made people think about race.

"Maybe there is something he does want to say and put across" about race, Bogle said. "Maybe if he had a black hero in there, that point would have been even stronger."  }}}

 

One thing that struck me in the movie was Colonel Whats-his-name saying, "limp dick scientists."

But while he is saying that he is climbing into one of those Waldo-robot-war machines.  That machine is a product of science if I ever saw one.  It cannot be accidental that Cameron had the actor say that while he was climbing into the machine.

 

I think Avatar is more about the technology and the POWER that it gives people than it is about RACE.  It is just that I think the wielders and the victims of the technological power concentrate more on PEOPLE then Technology.

 

But do a little thought experiment.  Imagine that the Indians had been technologically advanced when Europeans showed up.  Imagine Christopher Columbus sailing up to the shores of America and standing on the beach are Geronimo and Sitting Bull with AK-47s.  What would the world be like today?

 

Obviously the Indians would have had a whole different culture if they could make AK-47s and people casually walked around with them.  But history is more about who had the technology and who didn't than it is about White, Black, Red and Yellow.

 

Xum

But then again ... maybe not!!    




Audiences experience 'Avatar' blues

By Jo Piazza, Special to CNN
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Some fans say James Cameron's "Avatar" may have been too real
  • "Avatar Forums" has a topic thread discussing depression over "Pandora being intangible"
  • Cameron's movie has pulled in more than $1.4 billion in worldwide box office

(CNN) -- James Cameron's completely immersive spectacle "Avatar" may have been a little too real for some fans who say they have experienced depression and suicidal thoughts after seeing the film because they long to enjoy the beauty of the alien world Pandora.

On the fan forum site "Avatar Forums," a topic thread entitled "Ways to cope with the depression of the dream of Pandora being intangible," has received more than 1,000 posts from people experiencing depression and fans trying to help them cope. The topic became so popular last month that forum administrator Philippe Baghdassarian had to create a second thread so people could continue to post their confused feelings about the movie.

"I wasn't depressed myself. In fact the movie made me happy ," Baghdassarian said. "But I can understand why it made people depressed. The movie was so beautiful and it showed something we don't have here on Earth. I think people saw we could be living in a completely different world and that caused them to be depressed."

A post by a user called Elequin expresses an almost obsessive relationship with the film.

"That's all I have been doing as of late, searching the Internet for more info about 'Avatar.' I guess that helps. It's so hard I can't force myself to think that it's just a movie, and to get over it, that living like the Na'vi will never happen. I think I need a rebound movie," Elequin posted.

A user named Mike wrote on the fan Web site "Naviblue" that he contemplated suicide after seeing the movie.

"Ever since I went to see 'Avatar' I have been depressed. Watching the wonderful world of Pandora and all the Na'vi made me want to be one of them. I can't stop thinking about all the things that happened in the film and all of the tears and shivers I got from it," Mike posted. "I even contemplate suicide thinking that if I do it I will be rebirthed in a world similar to Pandora and the everything is the same as in 'Avatar.' "

Other fans have expressed feelings of disgust with the human race and disengagement with reality.

Cameron's movie, which has pulled in more than $1.4 billion in worldwide box office sales and could be on track to be the highest grossing film of all time, is set in the future when the Earth's resources have been pillaged by the human race. A greedy corporation is trying to mine the rare mineral unobtainium from the planet Pandora, which is inhabited by a peace-loving race of 7-foot tall, blue-skinned natives called the Na'vi.

In their race to mine for Pandora's resources, the humans clash with the Na'vi, leading to casualties on both sides. The world of Pandora is reminiscent of a prehistoric fantasyland, filled with dinosaur-like creatures mixed with the kinds of fauna you may find in the deep reaches of the ocean. Compared with life on Earth, Pandora is a beautiful, glowing utopia.

Ivar Hill posts to the "Avatar" forum page under the name Eltu. He wrote about his post-"Avatar" depression after he first saw the film earlier this month.

"When I woke up this morning after watching Avatar for the first time yesterday, the world seemed ... gray. It was like my whole life, everything I've done and worked for, lost its meaning," Hill wrote on the forum. "It just seems so ... meaningless. I still don't really see any reason to keep ... doing things at all. I live in a dying world."

Reached via e-mail in Sweden where he is studying game design, Hill, 17, explained that his feelings of despair made him desperately want to escape reality.

"One can say my depression was twofold: I was depressed because I really wanted to live in Pandora, which seemed like such a perfect place, but I was also depressed and disgusted with the sight of our world, what we have done to Earth. I so much wanted to escape reality," Hill said.

Cameron's special effects masterpiece is very lifelike, and the 3-D performance capture and CGI effects essentially allow the viewer to enter the alien world of Pandora for the movie's 2½-hour running time, which only lends to the separation anxiety some individuals experience when they depart the movie theater.

"Virtual life is not real life and it never will be, but this is the pinnacle of what we can build in a virtual presentation so far," said Dr. Stephan Quentzel, psychiatrist and Medical Director for the Louis Armstrong Center for Music and Medicine at Beth Israel Medical Center in New York. "It has taken the best of our technology to create this virtual world and real life will never be as utopian as it seems onscreen. It makes real life seem more imperfect."

Fans of the movie may find actor Stephen Lang, who plays the villainous Col. Miles Quaritch in the film, an enemy of the Na'vi people and their sacred ground, an unlikely sympathizer. But Lang says he can understand the connection people are feeling with the movie.

"Pandora is a pristine world and there is the synergy between all of the creatures of the planet and I think that strikes a deep chord within people that has a wishfulness and a wistfulness to it," Lang said. "James Cameron had the technical resources to go along with this incredibly fertile imagination of his and his dream is built out of the same things that other peoples' dreams are made of."

The bright side is that for Hill and others like him -- who became dissatisfied with their own lives and with our imperfect world after enjoying the fictional creation of James Cameron -- becoming a part of a community of like-minded people on an online forum has helped them emerge from the darkness.

"After discussing on the forums for a while now, my depression is beginning to fade away. Having taken a part in many discussions concerning all this has really, really helped me," Hill said. "Before, I had lost the reason to keep on living -- but now it feels like these feelings are gradually being replaced with others."

Quentzel said creating relationships with others is one of the keys to human happiness, and that even if those connections are occurring online they are better than nothing.

"Obviously there is community building in these forums," Quentzel said. "It may be technologically different from other community building, but it serves the same purpose."

Within the fan community, suggestions for battling feelings of depression after seeing the movie include things like playing "Avatar" video games or downloading the movie soundtrack, in addition to encouraging members to relate to other people outside the virtual realm and to seek out positive and constructive activities.

 
 
 









'Avatar' Critics See Racist Theme



Near the end of the hit film "Avatar," the villain snarls at the hero, "How does it feel to betray your own race?" Both men are white – although the hero is inhabiting a blue-skinned, 9-foot-tall, long-tailed alien.

Strange as it may seem for a film that pits greedy, immoral humans against noble denizens of a faraway moon, "Avatar" is being criticized by a small but vocal group of people who allege it contains racist themes – the white hero once again saving the primitive natives.

Since the film opened to widespread critical acclaim three weeks ago, hundreds of blog posts, newspaper articles, tweets and YouTube videos have said things such as the film is "a fantasy about race told from the point of view of white people" and that it reinforces "the white Messiah fable."

The film's writer and director, James Cameron, says the real theme is about respecting others' differences.

In the film (read no further if you don't want the plot spoiled for you) a white, paralyzed Marine, Jake Sully, is mentally linked to an alien's body and set loose on the planet Pandora. His mission: persuade the mystic, nature-loving Na'vi to make way for humans to mine their land for unobtanium, worth $20 million per kilo back home.

Like Kevin Costner in "Dances with Wolves" and Tom Cruise in "The Last Samurai" or as far back as Jimmy Stewart in the 1950 Western "Broken Arrow," Sully soon switches sides. He falls in love with the Na'vi princess and leads the bird-riding, bow-and-arrow-shooting aliens to victory over the white men's spaceships and mega-robots.

Adding to the racial dynamic is that the main Na'vi characters are played by actors of color, led by a Dominican, Zoe Saldana, as the princess. The film also is an obvious metaphor for how European settlers in America wiped out the Indians.

Robinne Lee, an actress in such recent films as "Seven Pounds" and "Hotel for Dogs," said that "Avatar" was "beautiful" and that she understood the economic logic of casting a white lead if most of the audience is white.

But she said the film, which so far has the second-highest worldwide box-office gross ever, still reminded her of Hollywood's "Pocahontas" story – "the Indian woman leads the white man into the wilderness, and he learns the way of the people and becomes the savior."

"It's really upsetting in many ways," said Lee, who is black with Jamaican and Chinese ancestry. "It would be nice if we could save ourselves."

Annalee Newitz, editor-in-chief of the sci-fi Web site io9.com, likened "Avatar" to the recent film "District 9," in which a white man accidentally becomes an alien and then helps save them, and 1984's "Dune," in which a white man becomes an alien Messiah.

"Main white characters realize that they are complicit in a system which is destroying aliens, AKA people of color ... (then) go beyond assimilation and become leaders of the people they once oppressed," she wrote.

"When will whites stop making these movies and start thinking about race in a new way?" wrote Newitz, who is white.

Black film professor and author Donald Bogle said he can understand why people would be troubled by "Avatar," although he praised it as a "stunning" work.

"A segment of the audience is carrying in the back of its head some sense of movie history," said Bogle, author of "Toms, Coons, Mulattoes, Mammies & Bucks: An Interpretive History of Blacks in American Films."

Bogle stopped short, however, of calling the movie racist.

"It's a film with still a certain kind of distortion," he said. "It's a movie that hasn't yet freed itself of old Hollywood traditions, old formulas."

Writer/director Cameron, who is white, said in an e-mail to The Associated Press that his film "asks us to open our eyes and truly see others, respecting them even though they are different, in the hope that we may find a way to prevent conflict and live more harmoniously on this world. I hardly think that is a racist message."

There are many ways to interpret the art that is "Avatar."

What does it mean that in the final, sequel-begging scene, Sully abandons his human body and transforms into one of the Na'vi for good? Is Saldana's Na'vi character the real heroine because she, not Sully, kills the arch-villain? Does it matter that many conservatives are riled by what they call liberal environmental and anti-military messages?

Is Cameron actually exposing the historical evils of white colonizers? Does the existence of an alien species expose the reality that all humans are actually one race?

"Can't people just enjoy movies any more?" a person named Michelle posted on the Web site for Essence, the magazine for black women, which had 371 comments on a story debating the issue.

Although the "Avatar" debate springs from Hollywood's historical difficulties with race, Will Smith recently saved the planet in "I Am Legend," and Denzel Washington appears ready to do the same in the forthcoming "Book of Eli."

Bogle, the film historian, said that he was glad Cameron made the film and that it made people think about race.

"Maybe there is something he does want to say and put across" about race, Bogle said. "Maybe if he had a black hero in there, that point would have been even stronger."


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...-theme_n_418155.html

{{{  "Ever since I went to see 'Avatar' I have been depressed. Watching the wonderful world of Pandora and all the Na'vi made me want to be one of them. I can't stop thinking about all the things that happened in the film and all of the tears and shivers I got from it," Mike posted. "I even contemplate suicide thinking that if I do it I will be rebirthed in a world similar to Pandora and the everything is the same as in 'Avatar.' "  }}}

 

Some people are just wacko.

 

I know the cure.  Make them watch The Matrix trilogy 20 times.  No wait, will that bring tham back to Earth or make them more depressed?  No make it Aliens.  Show them what outer space is really like. 

 

That'll burst their bubble.

 

Xum

Saw the movie this weekend. It is a technological masterpiece. That said, it is naively racists, there is simply no getting around it. It is Dances with Wolves or The Last Samurai all over again. With respect to the interviews of Cameron that I have read, his naivete (ignorance) on this point is more than palpable.

Once more, the white male is "the hero" who saves the noble savages. Even a more generous reading of the protagonist as a cipher, or as representative of humanity is problematic in that it is a reinforcement of "white male" normativity, or the universality of what is particular (white and maleness).
The movie would have been much more radical if Cameron had chosen to cast a female and/or a person of color as the lead. He could have stirred the pot a little more, by playing with gender or sexuality/sexual orientation. The aliens could have been intersex, or something along the lines of LeGuin's Left Hand of Darkness. That is when sci fi is at its best, IMO.

As kind of a cultural critic, I also am really tired of the psychological manipulation and contrivances that the media use. Of course, they use them, because they work, they are evocative on an almost organic level with human beings (true love, the myth of the hero, nobility of nature, interconnectedness, good vs evil). More creative storyline would have been nice. What about a more ambiguous hero (say like in District 9). Some of the same issues are faced, but nobility or purity are not assumed. There is moral ambiguity, and no fairy tale ending.
Reference:
It is Dances with Wolves or The Last Samurai all over again. With respect to the interviews of Cameron that I have read, his naivete (ignorance) on this point is more than palpable. Once more, the white male is "the hero" who saves the noble savages. Even a more generous reading of the protagonist as a cipher, or as representative of humanity is problematic in that it is a reinforcement of "white male" normativity, or the universality of what is particular (white and maleness). The movie would have been much more radical if Cameron had chosen to cast a female and/or a person of color as the lead. He could have stirred the pot a little more, by playing with gender or sexuality/sexual orientation. The aliens could have been intersex, or something along the lines of LeGuin's Left Hand of Darkness. That is when sci fi is at its best, IMO. As kind of a cultural critic, I also am really tired of the psychological manipulation and contrivances that the media use. Of course, they use them, because they work, they are evocative on an almost organic level with human beings (true love, the myth of the hero, nobility of nature, interconnectedness, good vs evil). More creative storyline would have been nice. What about a more ambiguous hero (say like in District 9). Some of the same issues are faced, but nobility or purity are not assumed. There is moral ambiguity, and no fairy tale ending.
Considering how successful Cameron has been I find it somewhat difficult to imagine him as naive.  Considering how much money was spent on Titanic and this film I think he knows how to bow to reality.  He could risk alienating major audiences like the US and Europe and risk losing A LOT OF MONEY.

But is even though race can be regarded as a BIG DEAL in this movie, is it really?  Is the issue of the last 500 years really race or is it technology and who had it?  Aren't all of the cultures on the planet obsolete now?  Aren't we stuck with having to cope with 7,000,000,000 people and running out of oil and the complex technology no matter what? 

It is curious how they never explained how this unobtanium was found on Pandora or why it was so valuable.  But humans could not have gotten there without star travel technology and they are saying Earth was a wreck.

But movies have foreground stories and background stories.  The background story sets up the situation that the characters in the foreground must deal with.  The background story in Casablanca was World War II.  The background story for Avatar is corporate economics and technology.  But that was the background in Aliens and Terminator II and it appeared in The Abyss also.

Although racism can be read into this story I don't think it is a serious concern of Cameron's.  But it does add to the technological perspective of the last 500 years.  I have noticed that the laws of physics don't give a damn about Greek or Latin.

Xum
Um,
We are going to have to continue to disagree on this issue. For one, the movie was an argument against technology and for nature. It was technology that ruined earth. It was technology that was defeated by nature and culture with respect to the Na'vi sending the technologically more advanced humans packing. It was disrespect for culture and nature that created the conflict in the first place.

Physics and science do not exist in a vacuum. This is the theme of Friedrich Dürrenmatt's  Die Physiker. This is the point of one of the most influential philosophical essays of the 20th century, Heidegger's "The Question Concerning Technology."

How a society uses technology, how a society understands what is of value, whether they should be concerned about global warming, designed obsolescence, are not scientific questions. They are moral, ethical, and cultural questions. Science and technology are tools. But what governs how the tools are used, who uses them, who has access to them, these are cultural questions.

It is social and cultural matters why people make the choices that they do. Human beings are much more complex than any piece of technology. The reason that there was a financial crisis is not because people do not possess accounting skills. It is because of a culture that has been created that is materialistic, that relishes conspicuous consumption, etc. You might say that this is dumb, but it is also very human. Human beings are not logic engines, and any significant social transformation is going to require much more than empirical data.
Reference:
We are going to have to continue to disagree on this issue. For one,the movie was an argument against technology and for nature.

Doesn't that imply that the Na'vi would never develop technology?  Why would they develop airplanes if they have flying dragons?  But there is still plenty to develop.  How would their concept of astronomy evolve from the perspective of a moon?

Reference:
It is social and cultural matters why people make the choices that they do. Human beings are much more complex than any piece of technology. The reason that there was a financial crisis is not because people do not possess accounting skills. It is because of a culture that has been created that is materialistic, that relishes conspicuous consumption, etc. You might say that this is dumb, but it is also very human. Human beings are not logic engines, and any significant social transformation is going to require much more than empirical data.
And who decides what BEING HUMAN IS?

Is it only the DUMB humans that qualify as HUMAN?

Which humans develop the science and technology and which humans decide what to do with it?

With 7,000,000,000 people on the planet the technology cannot be eliminated.  So it still comes down to deciding what to do with the technology.  Blaming the technology is A BULLSHIT COPOUT.

All of the humans are stuck on this planet though.  Is Cameron really just telling us there is NOWHERE TO GO it's just a FANTASY and that is why the humans get kicked out?  There is no way off the planet.  There is no technological magic that is going to pull our fat out of the fire.  We have to PUT OUR BRAINS IN GEAR and figure out what to do HERE.

The culture values people playing status games with expensive technology that they don't understand.  Yeah, look at the economy.  When was the last time you heard an educator say that EVERYONE should know accounting?  Yeah, how do all of the educators explain how accounting in SEVEN HUNDRED YEARS OLD and we have CHEAP COMPUTERS EVERYWHERE but they have never suggested that everyone know something that simple?

Ever consider that entire cultures can be stupid in that stupid lines of thought are encouraged and better lines of thought are discouraged so cultures keep people in the approved cultural rut?  That might be the real purpose of the so called educational system.  One famous economists talked about planned obsolescence 50 YEARS AGO but the vast majority say nothing.  Is that CULTURE AT WORK?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0wk4qG2mIg

So technology combined with DUMB culture has brought us here and one of them has to go.  But with so many people it can't be the technology that goes.

ROFL

Xum
Last edited {1}

Vatican denounces Avatar movie


{{{ VATICAN CITY (AP) — The Vatican newspaper and radio station have called the film "Avatar" simplistic, and criticized it for flirting with modern doctrines that promote the worship of nature as a substitute for religion.

L'Osservatore Romano and Vatican Radio dedicated ample coverage to James Cameron's big-grossing, 3-D spectacle. But the reviews were lukewarm, calling the movie superficial in its eco-message, despite groundbreaking visual effects.

L'Osservatore said the film "gets bogged down by a spiritualism linked to the worship of nature." Similarly, Vatican Radio said it "cleverly winks at all those pseudo-doctrines that turn ecology into the religion of the millennium."

"Nature is no longer a creation to defend, but a divinity to worship," the radio said. }}}
http://www.morningjournal.com/...0b2e69d512014179.txt

ROFL

That should sell even more tickets.

What was the Vatican saying about "simplistic and sappy" when Spanish conquistadors were sending gold from South America back to Spain? How much of that went to the Church? If AVATAR is looked upon as an allegory for the last 500 years of Earth history then how much of that bloody history can be lain at the feet of the Catholic Church?


Xum

It will be a LONG Time before someone breaks Cameron's record now.

2nd look: 'Avatar'

Going to see the blockbuster again? Watch for these highlights.

Last Updated: 8:26 AM, January 31, 2010

Last week, James Cameron’s “Avatar” became history’s highest grossing film — passing the $1.84 billion in global sales achieved by his earlier blockbuster “Titanic.” Its success is largely due to the amazingly realistic visual effects Cameron and his team labored over, which have inspired repeat customers. When seen in 3-D Pandora is a marvel of texture and color that rewards multiple viewings. Whether it’s your first or fifth trip to this exotic moon, here are some of the film’s most stunning moments. Keep both eyes open and you’ll catch details you haven’t seen before.


Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/entert...YE4LnM#ixzz0eCaLFoiY

They would have to produce TWO BLOCKBUSTERS IN A ROW.

Xum

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×