Skip to main content

quote:
Originally posted by Willywill3:

Again I don't even know why you asked me if I liked little girls? lol


-recap-

WillWIll3 said:
"But I do and have defending God and spirituality just because of some of the weird and untrue things people are saying. It doesn't hurt to think just a little deeply about this, than being dense."

Raptor's [direct] response to that ^^^ statement:

quote:
Orignally posted by Raptor
The same has been asked of you,("to think just a little deeply about this, than being dense"). What makes your campaign( that is: "defending God and spirituality just because of some of the weird and untrue things people are saying"), more noble? Because you don't like 'little girls'?


Either dubyadubya3 is kidding, lying or his comprehention skills are abysmal.

In any event, this is what WillyWill3 had to resort to when his case crashed and burned.

My quote clearly shows that I never asked if he liked little girls.

He claims I did.

I asked him to quote where I said he like little girls.

He did not...

The facts reveal that he could not.

Again. Again.
Card is pulled.
quote:
Originally posted by Raptor:
quote:
Originally posted by Willywill3:
The reason I do not take Frued serious is the fact that he was a drug addict. Why would any sane person take a drug addict seriously? So again, should I ask Jeffery Domer for tips on cooking?
Why would any 'sane person' take Hitler seriously, that is, put him on a pedistol? Wanna compare who's the baddist, WillyWill3?


quote:
The reason I laugh at Archaya S. is because like many others who have criticized her, her work has no backbone.
Like others...

quote:
She claims now that in her Christ conspiracy's book that Jesus Christ is a clone of Appolanuis, Jesus Panthera, etc. All those gentlemen were born way after his death and with the Mithra, do understand that the only thing that the Roman Catholic church used from them were candles, the ceremonies and robes.
You seem to be sencere. I wanna...beleive you. But before I do. You mind citing what she said exactly, that you disagree with? You know, so that we do not fall victim to "overgeneralizing"...

quote:
...she said that the Buddha was God? The Buddha was an Atheist?
Interesting. May I have the page were she said that, so I can got, right now, and look it up?
quote:
... the Bhagahad Gita inspired the Old Testament?[ Where in the world would make her think this??? It's laughable...
I must admit, that is kind of funny. What page is that on?

quote:
It's common sense to see that people can misuse anything, history, life right now speaks for itself. I thought that was obvious...
I'm sorry to disappoint you.

quote:
"The same has been asked of you. What makes your campaign more noble? Because you don't like 'little girls'?"

Elaborate on that a bit more? I have no idea what this even means or have to do with this conversation. I like grown women, little girls will get you locked up.
Asked and answered.


This is rather stupid to bicker over this kind like Archarya S. and her views about people and religion, and like most Atheist when it should really be about working together. But some people on both sides are obsessed with ridiculing one another. It makes it all the fun though and by the way, you did ask me about the little girls, right above.

Lying is a sin. lol
(I'm not perfect either)
quote:
Originally posted by Willywill3:

This is rather stupid to bicker over this kind like Archarya S. and her views about people and religion, and like most Atheist when it should really be about working together. But some people on both sides are obsessed with ridiculing one another.


I'm trying work with you WillyWill3. I asked you for a page number to lead me to what she said, that you reject.

You want me to take your word for it. Quite frankly, I don't wanna take your word for it. No fun in that. Show me...

Regardless of how you feel about the chick; you never read her works, have you? What are the odds, that you've read what somebody else said about her works, huh?

I'll make it easy for you... Assuming you don't have any of her works on your person, give me the link.

quote:
It makes it all the fun though and by the way, you did ask me about the little girls, right above.


-recap-(for fun)

WillWIll3 said:
"But I do and have defending God and spirituality just because of some of the weird and untrue things people are saying. It doesn't hurt to think just a little deeply about this, than being dense."

Raptor's [direct] response to that ^^^ statement:

quote:
Orignally posted by Raptor
The same has been asked of you,("to think just a little deeply about this, than being dense"). What makes your campaign( that is: "defending God and spirituality just because of some of the weird and untrue things people are saying"), more noble? Because you don't like 'little girls'?



Either dubyadubya3 is kidding, lying or his comprehention skills are abysmal.

In any event, this is what WillyWill3 had to resort to when his case crashed and burned.

My quote clearly shows that I never asked if he liked little girls.

He claims I did. (Again)

I asked him to quote where I said he like little girls.

He did not... (Again)

The facts reveal that he could not.(Again)

Again. Again... Again.
Card is pulled.
Last edited {1}
quote:
Those who believe must be there first to "create" non-believers.

You said that...

I interpret that as those who believe in God create Atheist, and that is why I said why allow religious nut jobs (mainly conservatives) ruin religion for you?

My statement was without any judgement. Atheism is no belief-system. Only those who believe can call non-believers Atheists. The term Atheist was once used as a pejorative term against people without belief or the "wrong" belief. This is what I mean with "create" Atheists.
quote:
Originally posted by Willywill3:
quote:
Originally posted by Oshun Auset:
quote:
Originally posted by Willywill3:
quote:
Originally posted by Oshun Auset:

Nope... I also don't have a 'God' concept as far as an external 'being'...

Also, I know many an atheist/naturalists and revolutionaries who live a far more 'spiritual' existance than many who profess religion.

Some people concentrate on belief, some people worry about lividity.


So for those who worry about lividity, why build weapons of mass destruction then?


17 are you talking about? What relevence does it have? And why are you asking me that question? Do you think people who find and build more efficient ways of mass murder(WMDs) are concentrating on lividity(expressing their spirituallity via the way they live their life)?


That is the question I asked, because we all know people do not live their lives based on their spiritual beliefs. Seems like if you are wishing to preserving human life, or life entirely, for those who build destructive instruments such as nukes, have are you living by your "spiritual views" and promoting it? Hypocrisy is on both sides and it seems it is not just limited to those who are religious either. Of course....

In other words, people can say they believe in God and are all moral, yet contradict themselves. The same for any one else who doesn't believe in a God and say they are morally superior. That is why I asked you that.

You rarely get some one who is true to their beliefs by the way to answer your question.


Oh nevermind! bang

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×