Skip to main content

Reply to ".XXX"

quote:
it seems fair, equitable, and protective of whatever free speech rights courts have misinterpreted the 1st Amendment as protecting.


Thank you, Vox. Whenever I say that the 1st amendment was only intended to protect political speech, e.g., the right to criticize government, petition the govetrnment and seek redress, period; people look at me like I've lost my mind.

quote:
I worry that the point of that is to create a future campaign issue, where visits to .xxx sites, or Google searches for same, becomes the new marijuana


But those searches can go both ways, so with the seemingly daily "outing" of these hard-core Christo-fascists, you'd think they'd not want to go down that path.
×
×
×
×