Skip to main content

Reply to "Why blkCONS cannot logically justify their stance on issues"

That is my signature tagline, not a commentary on Kevin or you (unless you believe the tagline describes your behavior). You create too much subtext to be offended and annoyed by - I told you I'll always be direct about what I have to say.

I don't live in Boston - I don't think Kevin or you are there either, so none of us are extremely knowlegeable about public schools there. Without facts about the admissions process or qualifications of applying students, you are assuming a causal relationship between race being removed as a criteria and drop in minority admissions. Your gut feeling (and even mine) may be that without legal checks, racist admissions policies are back in place, but it is just a guess without the stats.

I'm not a conservative or liberal - those designations belong to the talking heads that profit from the artificial divisions that arise from the titles. The major and independent parties have tracts that are appealing to me - I'm not a monolith, pledging myself to one party line, forever & ever, Amen.

And Kevin makes the assertion, so actually the burden of proof is on him. Ultimately, his point was made with the first two paragraphs and the ending editorial weakened it because it was not supported (If it was, show me where it was supported in his post?).
Last edited {1}
×
×
×
×