Originally posted by MBM:
Common wisdom would say that this case established the "separate but equal" clause. Quoting Justice Brown:
"That (the Separate Car Act) does not conflict with the Thirteenth Amendment, which abolished slavery...is too clear for argument...A statute which implies merely a legal distinction between the white and colored races -- a distinction which is founded in the color of the two races, and which must always exist so long as white men are distinguished from the other race by color -- has no tendency to destroy the legal equality of the two races...The object of the Fourteenth Amendment was undoubtedly to enforce the absolute equality of the two races before the law, but in the nature of things it could not have been intended to abolish distinctions based upon color, or to enforce social, as distinguished from political equality, or a commingling of the two races upon terms unsatisfactory to either."
Why do I sense that you see it differently?
Onward and Upward!
LOL! Because you are siting what the establishment has taught you!!!
I will post the FULL opinion of the case. But MBM, before I do, do you know why this case came into being, the specifics starting in 1892???