Skip to main content

Reply to "Teacher suspended for ten days, after calling student Nigga!"

quote:
The post before it I answered
"By the government officially setting a standard which made a distinction upon the basis of ethnicity... As far as the actual usage of the word goes, I personally wouldn't be hurt at all. Its nice to see we agree on a concept we've both repeated over and over again."
Ummmm.... That was an answer to a different question. And the question was NEVER about you "personally."
quote:
  • HOW ARE WHITES HARMED BY NOT BEING ABLE TO SAY "NIGGER"?

  • If an official U.S. law was made that banned the N-Word and made it something that only Whites had to abide by (not saying it)... HOW WOULD WHITES BE HARMED??
  • See!? You faked like you answered THE SECOND ONE. HOW WOULD...? HOW ARE...? = Different questions. And, again, NEITHER asked about you "personally."

    But, thanks... Now it's all clear that all your talk about the thing with the teacher being "JUST AS RACIST" and it being "BIGOTRY" is/was nothing but BULLSHIT!!

    quote:
    You didn't bother reading my post. Nor the posts where I said I didn't think the word nigga was appropiate. Nor the posts where I said I agreed with the teachers punishment. I have a hard time believing you thouroughly read any of my posts before vomiting out your preconcieved rebuttals to what you assumed I was saying.
    I read all of that. And all of that is IRRELEVANT! You're still speaking about you "personally." My question wasn't "personal" to you. So what you think, "personally", is IRRELEVANT.

    Despite all those things you "personally" feel, you still maintain and have tried to defend the teacher. Despite all that you claimed the charge against him was "RACIST" and a form of "BIGOTRY." And that's exactly what my question set out to ascertain but you have pulled up lame and gone mum. You can muster anything intelligent or intellible that explains or justifies that BULLSHIT position of yours.

    quote:
    Racist as hell. Perspectives are situational and based upon personal experience. They don't come as a package deal with the colour of your fucking skin.
    BULLSHIT!! You are here speaking from a WHITE PERSPECTIVE. That's clear. Your position is noted and noted as completely biased towards the WHITE teacher who you clearly give/gave THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT because of your "personal" perspective which is laden with the way you view it as a White person. PERIOD.

    The whole time you have transposed and imposed HOW YOU FEEL and what you think AS A WHITE PERSON if you were in that situation as opposed to what the actual situation is. You have tried to forward the notion of being "FALSELY ACCUSED" because that's what your WHITE ASS thinks and that's your "pre-packaged", BIASED thoughts on the issue and not the result of an objective examination of the issue.

    Besides, your "personal experience" is IRRELEVANT to this case. It is not about you save for when you make logical errors when trying to bastardize the facts of the case as you have done.

    quote:
    Racist. What kind of dumbass comes across the idea that all white people having the perverse desire to call black people "nigger." Answer, a racist one.
    Ha! Ha! CRYING RACISM isn't going to help you. And there was NO such statement that declared that "ALL" WHITE people anything...

    PROOF THAT YOU DON'T READ:
    quote:
    And... NO ONE SAID THIS! STAY ON TOPIC!!
    Frown It is racist if you're assuming all white people want to be racist. Frown

    And, again, you pretend to be an authority as if what you say is so, just because you say so. Please stop smelling yourself and get off the low-tech BULLSHIT! No one said anything about ALL WHITE people. IDIOT!! This situation, when you want to talk about probability, can't possibly incorporate ALL WHITE people for ALL WHITE people aren't driven to trip over the so-called "double-standard" of who can use and who can't use the N-Word. So what are you talking about?

    Posted February 15, 2006 07:50 PM
    When you catch the fuck up, let me know.

    quote:
    Then the use of the word "nigga" is racist in any situation, yet you condone its use among blacks. There is a conflict of cognitions there, one that is apparently not new, looking back at your conversations with Frenchy. You are a racist, and a confused one at that.
    NO CONFLICT AT ALL... Those yours is properly noted.

    YOU CAN READ!

    Now, by your own definition, since it is a situation where ONE "RACE" is singled out... that's "RACIST."

    *Ahem*.... BY YOUR DEFINITION. You forwarded that definition, NOT ME! So it's all about your DUMB ASS and your DUMB ASS definition which, when applied across the board, cuts against you.

    You will note, I made no such determination. No such lame, anal, abstract (and lacking) definition. So there is no "Then..." that's applicable to me. It's your definition, not mine. So, in actuality, the CONFUSION and CONTRADICTION is all yours as that very quote of mine made clear.

    quote:
    Then the use of the word "nigga" is racist in any situation
    I have consistently maintained that it isn't. You, not I, have tried to define "racism" in such an inane fashion. That's why you can't answer my question responsibly, effectively:
    HOW ARE WHITES HARMED BY NOT BEING ABLE TO SAY "NIGGER"?

    And you never even faked like you answered this:
    What is the "OBJECTIVE TREATMENT" in this whole WHITES CAN'T SAY THE N-WORD thingy that amounts to anything worth mentioning in the same conversation as the Civil Rights Movement?

    Seriously? What Civil Right is being violated when we say WHITES CAN'T and BETTER NOT SAY THE N-WORD?

    What is the harsh, unfair and DISADVANTAGING treatment that's being visited/imposed on Whites by making the N-Word off limits?


    Obviously you don't/didn't have a pre-fab script that prepared you to answer that. Instead, you'll just make vain claims that it's "Just As Racist" and "Bigotry Is Bigotry"... though you can't produce a functional and objective definition of either term and certainly not one that would qualify what you're calling "racist" either in this situation or with your claims about me as some actual "racism", etc. that meets any serious definition that matches the connotation of the term you invoke.

    EQUIVOCATING and, as a result LYING... will get you nowhere.

    quote:
    Frown Whats more you come across as an ignorant sack of shit. Frown
    Ignorant of what?

    quote:
    Frown I'd respect your opinion more if you actually read my posts rather than assuming what they might contain. Frown
    Big Grin
    JACO SAID: "I was expecting you to go off on a tangent..."

    No SELF-RESPECT, huh? lol

    quote:
    Frown The racism doesn't help much either. Frown
    Yeah and I'm supposed to be fazed by your SUBJECTIVE and SELECTIVE definition and use of the term. As I have shown, you were not calling the TEACHER "racist" for his RACIALIZED activity whereby he singled out BLACK STUDENTS as ones he wanted to "relate" to and feel [more] comfortable with (because of something that's was obviously lacking in his experience and his mindset).

    So, you've already FUCKED THAT UP for yourself. Your selective application of the term renders your accusations MOOT!

    quote:
    In closing, you have no intention of productive discussion, go fuck yourself you ignorant and obstinate son of a ruptured bitch. You can have the last word now you goddamn troll
    Truth is, I've long since demonstrated that you have and never had any intention of having a "productive" discussion because of your noted BIAS. Your noted WHITE BIAS evidenced by you preferencing Underwood's statement to the exclusion of Morrow's...

    That WHITE BIAS of yours is also evidenced by you preferencing the teacher (at every turn). One major contradiction of yours you never reconciled had to do with you not considering BOTH PARTIES' PERCEPTIONS, objectively, in the communication. YOU SAID:
    Put simply... whatever the two parties involved in conversation perceive the meaning of a word to be, that's what the word means in that conversation.

    ... Yet the only party's INTENT or PERCERPTION you effectively explored was that of the WHITE TEACHER'S. You listed nothing but blatant, prejudiced and obstinate opinions about the student. Apparently, how he PERCEIVED things was irrelevant to you. You could just assign him a sinister motive without pause or consideration. Without any type of basis for doing so (save your prejudiced opinions) but you had all types of elaborate schemes/reasons for giving that WHITE TEACHER "The Benefit Of The Doubt."

    You even inserted yourself directly (without the mask) by saying:
    Frown I'd rather be called a dumbass then be called a racist. Frown

    But that's actually revealing. This has really been all about your AVERSION to the term "racist" when applied to someone WHITE. You've certainly have had no such aversion applying it indiscriminately to someone Black. And so, I continue to say NO BULLSHIT WANTED, NO BULLSHIT ALLOWED.

    Your subjective BULLSHIT was readily apparent from the start. What has happened here has been a process by which you couldn't keep the covers you thought you had on your ideas. Basically, you've been Stipped Naked and because of that you reflexive scream "RACISM".

    What an ironic turn of events! lol


    (And, yet again, a selective one to. YOUR DUMB WHITE EQUATION that calls any attention given to race "racism" was what came back to bite you. See...? When we take that lame, abstract and inane concept as the definition of "racism" then we have to judge the teacher as "racist" BY YOUR DEFINITION. Again, his attempt to "relate" to BLACK STUDENTS called attention to their "race". He effectively singled BLACK STUDENTS out and you had/have nothing to say about it. Which figures...)
    ×
    ×
    ×
    ×