Skip to main content

Reply to "Teacher suspended for ten days, after calling student Nigga!"

quote:
I'm not trying to get you to say it's ok for me or any other person to use the n-word.

IRRELEVANT!!!

And everything else you're "trying" - i.e. displaying - with your lawn chair logic is IRRELEVANT as well.

Now, whoever you thought you were talking... Where did they(I) say, "You're trying to get us(me) to say it's ok for Whites(you) to use the N-Word."

Logically, you can't get that out of anything I said, for certain:
  • The thing is, it's really telling when people like you make an issue out of and try to justify Whites using the N-Word.

    That is, indeed, what you've "tried" to do by defending and declaring that didn't say "anything racist at all."

  • Obviously, Whites that make such an argument feel they [WHITES] should have a right to call a Black person "Nigger".

    That is, indeed, the result of trying to defend the indefensible. That is, indeed, the logical result of this BULLSHIT:

    quote:
  • The double standard possessed by many people... is that it's ok to use the n-word if you are AA and racist if you aren't.

  • The general consensus is that its wrong because only black people are allowed to use the n-word. That is a load of crap. If people look at the color of someone's skin before deciding whether to take offense at a remark, all it shows is that they are at least as racist, and from the comment made regarding the teachers intent, probably more so than the teacher. Frown Don't feed me that crap, bigotry is bigotry. Frown
  • Come on and get your jokes on... while you get your Intellectually Challenged ass straight to addressing what I said:
    quote:
    Bigotry is Bigotry is IGNORANCE is IGNORANCE.
    That stuff might go for logic where you come from but that BS isn't working here. You can't strip a word of it's CONTEXT, history or anything else that has developed with the life of the word, no matter how much it flies against your idiotic ABSTRACT Abstractions.

    Yes, Bigotry Is Bigotry in the ABSTRACT, huh?
    Now, let's see you demonstrate how the two are comparable in ACTUALITY. So, yes, let's here you detail how the two are equally or similarly "bigoted" in real life use, impact and effect.
    Either address that or STFU!!!

    That Sleight of Hand BS, that anal abstract BS doesn't fly. And you can't even follow your own standards:
    Put simply... whatever the two parties involved in conversation perceive the meaning of a word to be, that's what the word means in that conversation.

    Now, what I did say you were trying to sell was this CONTRADICTED bullshit:
    Frown Its called parody, its funny, and wasn't racist at all. Frown

    REPEATING....
    Now, where did the TWO PARTIES *both* say that?

    That's the question before. That's the question that dismantles all your BULLSHIT about what the teacher said, intended to say, why he said what he said.... yada... yada... etc., etc.

    When you learn how to formulate an argument/position that doesn't self-destruct under its own weight (by virtue of the very ideas and standards you articulate) then you come back and see how that works. Right now, all you're doing is embarrassing yourself.

    You beg to differ?? Answer my question:
    Now, where did the TWO PARTIES *both* say situation was "funny", a "padody" and "not racist at all"?

    List DAWSON'S statement(s).... <<< H E R E >>>
    List the students statement(s)... <<< H E R E >>>
  • ×
    ×
    ×
    ×