WTF are you talking about?quote:YOUR BLANKET statement does not capture the entire issue.
What "blanket statement"???
PUNK..... or PUSSY?
You made this statement:
I just heard a story yesterday on NPR that said that UC Berkeley is not 50% ASIAN and growing.
... to which I said, in essence, it's been that way for a while.
WHERE IS THE BLANKET STATEMENT???
What part of my "statement" (a response to yours, explaining how it isn't a "just now" situation) is any more "blanket" than yours? Let alone "clueless" in terms of its "relevance"... seeing as how it was/is a direct statement-response to yours?
Yes!! I'm still conflicted. I don't know whether you are just a PUNK... Or if you're a PUSSY. You tell me.
You tell me exactly how clueless you are for this BLANKET shit you said:
... or SHUT THE FUCK UP!!quote:The loss of Blacks at Berkeley because they were DEPENDENT on a government program was A GAIN FOR THE ASIANS who have no such dependency.
That sure doesn't sound like some discrepancy relating to athletics that were overcome. And, nothing I said made a statement that was contradicted by the interview. And...
This whole thing devolved from your incessant rhetoric as you predictably used this topic as an opportunity to take pot-shots at Black people while not saying a damnd thing about "how to increase the number of Black people in [major] colleges and universities." You can highlight your statements to that effect from your original post.quote:IT IS IRRELEVANT in the discussion of how BLACK PEOPLE are going to increase our numbers in such schools.
That way you will help me decide whether you are A PUNK... or A PUSSY. Because you and I both know you didn't have shit to say towards an actual solution.
You see... Though I am still conflicted (still don't know if you're A PUNK or A PUSSY)... I do know, for sure, that I GOT YOUR WOLF TICKETS!!!