Right to bear Arms:
I find it alarming that we don't want our non-allied countries to have "weapons of mass destruction".
Funny, but I would bet that some of those who are anti-gun for america, suddenly think its ok for someone like a murderous tyrant such as a Hussein, 'should' have them?
Anyways, the problem has never been the US not allowing nations to not have WMD's. India and Pakistan are proof of that. The problem is that Iraq has ALWAYS denied trying to develope them, and been secretive about them, and THAT distinguishes Iraq from all the other nations who have openly "declared" they have them.
There is only ONE reason to keep the possession of nuclear weapons and WMD's "secret", such as Hussein does. And that cause he plans to 'use' them. Other nations declare they have nukes in order to deter nations from messing with them. North Korea declares they have nukes as a bargaining chip, in order to gain diplomatic leverage in their quest for world handouts. But keeping the entire ordeal 'secret', such as Iraq does???
Come now, god gave you that brain, start using it.