quote:Originally posted by Black Viking:
There are far to many assumptions being thrown around here.
First of all, a provacatively dressed woman does not equal a promiscuous woman.
Secondly, a man appreciating a provocatively dressed woman does not equal any kind of desire to have sex with said woman, or "loose" women in general.
I've already made these points:
1) The model is not herself necessarily promiscuous just because she's posing.
2) The mere fact that she is posing suggestively does NOT necessarily send the message that she is promiscuous.
3) The person enjoying the photographs is not necessarily perceiving the model as promiscuous nor deriving pleasure from the thought that the model may be promiscuous.
AGAIN: YOU'RE "DEBATING" A PHOTOGRAPHER
ALL I'm saying, folks, is that it depends: On the model, the pose, the viewer...
There are many variables in this situation. And not everyone responds the same way.
What's so damned controversial about this statement??
Some people really don't seem interested in listening...
Note: the use of the words "not necessarily" throughout.