Skip to main content

Reply to "Incentives"

[quote]On average, capitalist workers receive about 10% of their actual labor value. In a communist one, they would receive 100%./quote]

If they receive 100% of the value of their labor, am I correct in assuming that in an anarch-socialist state there are no compulsotroy taxes? If so, how do you propose people like the handicapped, elderly, ill, and orphans survive? What becomes of free public education, civil projects, and other state sponsored services which rely on taxes to pay the laborers?

Also, you say salaries would be higher in communist businesses, but if there is no centralized structure, what is to stop entrepeneurs from paying an extremely low "incentive" in exchange for a job. If I can get away with pying someone half of what I'm supposed to, what's my incentive to not do so, thus increasing my own profit? You can say workers will strike, but if every entrepeneurs gets this idea into their heads, there really won't be many alternatives. Unions can form, but then who regulates that union to stop them from becoming as greedy as the entrepeneurs. Would they not become a coercive force, then once you get unions and more bureacracy, it seems to start defeating one of the purposes of communism in the first place.

I can see communism or socialism working in small settings, but try to implement it on a national level and there's just way too much difficulty and becomes counterproductive when compared to capitalism. The fact that it has never in modern history succeeded on a national level seems to verify this.
×
×
×
×