KWELI??quote:Individuals would be justified in taking arms in defense of any group that they perceived to have been wronged, regardless of whether the wrong touches them personally.
Why must an individual be "personally" affected or impacted? That doesn't sound like a prescription for the Beloved Society. In fact, that's tantamount to justifying RACISM, let alone the most perversed individualistic "It's All About Me" type of mentality.
Now, I really don't understand that.
You say there would be chaos... But your notion of "justification", in race terms, legitimizes Segregation and discrimination... or at least the callous disregard.
"I wasn't wronged!"
"Tough shit! Deal with it!"