Skip to main content

Reply to "Danish Newspaper And Mohammed Cartoon"

quote:
Originally posted by Nmaginate:
Anytime you have FALSE or questionable images of Christ (i.e. White, GERMAN Jesus), not to mention images in the first place... then there is a lot less that is sacred about the Christ, Mary, etc. So, KRESGE, how you favored not sanctioning/censoring The SENSATION or whatever is really incompatible and doesn't make for a proper comparison. It just doesn't translate.

Again, what's suppose to come out of that process?

I think that the ethnicity (or historical accuracy" of the image is irrelevant as to its sanctity or sacredness. They are entirely different things.

As to there being no comparable term in Christianity, again, I think that there are people who view the image of Christ in a comparable fashion. There is not the same restrictions on human images in Christianity as there is in Islam, but know Christians who where angry enough with the movie The Last Tempation of Christ to call in bomb threats to theaters.

And I still stand by my view wwith respect to freedom of expression, artistic freedom, etc. Do I think that the Danish press shows a lack of sensitivity? Yes? But this does not justify violence.
×
×
×
×