Skip to main content

Reply to "Cognitive dissonance and the black woman"

quote:
Originally posted by Kai:
Kai


You are full of hot air ... and seem to be deliberately misconstruing my posts.

You asked me what I had against unity, protection, and service. My response was nothing. But what I objected to were the other unrelated doctrines which have not a damned thing to do with unity, protection, or service. But which nevertheless demand assent from members of the organization and whose ONLY function is intellectual control...

You asked what I had against unity, protection, and service and my response was and remains that I embrace these ideas. What I do not embrace are the other doctrines. I gave as an example the doctrine about Fard Muhammad - the ONLY reason why I even brought it up: as an example of a debatable doctrine unrelated to unity, protection, or service...

I'm not debating the correctness of these doctrines - nor am I "shocked" by them ... but I'm merely questioning whether or not they are necessary to achieve unity, protection, and service...

My contention is that they are not... that they are in fact unnecessarily destructive of "unity" as there is always room for disagreement over such doctrines... AND MOREOVER THEY SERVE NO OTHER FUNCTION THAN CONTROL OVER MEMBERS... And even more than that, they needlessly discriminate against good brothers and sisters who have great contributions to make to the collective and whose only crime is to refuse to submit their minds to wacky (at the worst - at the best debatable) ideas ...

I will not accept "UNITY" at any cost... Since Fascists frequently value and are able to achieve "UNITY"...

You seem to be deliberately changing the subject... And you are ticking me off...

* I would appreciate if in your next response to me you demonstrate some reading comprehension * Thank you... hat
Last edited {1}
×
×
×
×