Skip to main content

Reply to "Clearly, Illegal aliens and his or her lawyers have a better understanding of how best to hold a public servant accountable to the Constitution, than far too Many U.S. Born Blacks!"

http://www.ceyseauinc.com/

 

http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-182700

 

Source:  “Ex-officers get probation in Houston teen beating” uploaded by EbonyRose

 

https://www.africanamerica.org/topic/ex-officers-get-probation-in-houston-teen-beating?reply=321050148288400297#321050148288400297

 

http://www.chron.com/default/a...-beating-4460439.php

 

http://www.chron.com/default/a...-beating-4460090.php

 

Here again, when U.S. born Blacks place no value in Constitutional protections for U.S. citizens, and when there are no civil lawsuit mega-buck penalties on the back end, to hold public servants or anyone else financially liable for damages in the City (Houston, TX), County, State, or Federal jurisdiction where this beating, "Cruel and Unusual Punishment....a police officer is not the judge, jury, and executioner" of a Black teen took place it will be business as usual. 

 

Amendment VIII-Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E..._States_Constitution

 

http://www.archives.gov/exhibi...tion_transcript.html

 

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_1

 

Furthermore, U.S. born black men, women, and minors must stop committing or being involved in criminal activity.   

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unclean_hands

 

The Clean Hands Doctrine should send a strong message to anyone who seeks redress for criminal/negligent/unethical wrongdoing of another individual, a government or private business entity.  The individual making any claim for redress must first be law abiding before he or she can demand redress from anyone else who violates the law, the Constitution, the property rights of another individual, etc., etc.

 

Just think how strong this teen's legal claim for damages/redress would be, had he been innocent, not involved in an alleged burglary, etc., etc., leaving the police officers with "no probable cause" or means to explain or to justify the arrest, assault/battery on the teen in the first place. 

 

Chances are slim, that any police officer, probation officer or other public servant with any common sense, would have even considered arresting or violating the Constitutional rights of 15-year-old Chad Holley , had he been law abiding, and if so, this would be a very dysfunctional/rogue/unethical/ignorant police officer or public servant to violate the rights of any suspect without probable cause.

 

https://www.africanamerica.org/...t/320346378732483837

 

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-961198

 

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-949295

 

http://www.ceyseauinc.com/

 

This is not 1865, and the Dread Scott decision has no bearing on what happens today.  

The only enslavement that U.S. born Blacks face today are the obstacles that he or she place on themselves and/or any treasonous misfit from within the Black community itself who contributes to disparaging Constitutional protections.

 

https://www.africanamerica.org/...-many-us-born-blacks

 

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-963387

 

Clearly, Illegal aliens and his or her lawyers have a better understanding of how best to hold a public servant or anyone else accountable to the Constitution, the "Oath of Office", and/or the "Rule of Law" than far too Many U.S. Born Blacks!

Last edited by TheRealDeal
×
×
×
×