Skip to main content

Reply to "A white dudes take on repatriations"

Damn... you're determine to EXPOSE yourself... I mean, seriously...

Expose myself? Really? Well, no more than you do…… Besides, who are you? Bob Woodard? Daniel Ellsberg? What is there to EXPOSE other than differences of opinion?

When reparations is the concept/term you apply the adjective ("nefarious") to; nefarious meaning "flagrantly wicked or impious: evil."

And? Do you have a problem with that? Just to save you some more dictionary research time, I suggest you get over it rather than attempting to run down every word or adjective I use. But for the record, I don’t think the concept is necessarily evil or wicked. Those are your words. I think of it as an intellectually corrupt and shameful idea. One more thing, instead of constantly running to the dictionary to dissect and analyze every word I use –try using a Thesaurus. It will ease your confusion……

And then you tried to overcompensate for your obvious exposure by placing this is caps:

What???? There is no need nor reason for over compensation. Compensating for what? I state my opinion and that’s that. And “obvious exposure”? Exposure of what? The fact that you and I don’t agree? Wow! You just throw shit out there because you can type on a keyboard. Amazing……

... like you were making some kind of point other than you playing lip service to egalitarianism. You say:

quote: The constitution does not support reparations.


Yawn………Next………


But point to nothing in the Constitution that prohibits it and, of course, you say nothing to the kinds of reparations that the U.S. government has paid to "selected groups."

Don’t have to point to the Constitution where it is prohibited And I don’t have to make a argument for so-called reparations for “selected groups”. Their monetary compensation for unconstitutional interment was based on documented public records and living survivors. YOU CAN PRODUCE NETHEIR IN YOUR FANTASY CASE. End of subject……

And those, my constitutionally and competence CHALLENGED friend, are FACTS... Facts, you know, are facts.

What facts? Outside of your temper tantrums, personal attacks and failed attempts at pretending to be an English teacher – what facts did you produce?? YOU HAVE RPRODUCED NOTHING!!!! Those people who were compensated were compensated based on legal and public documented records! Their home, businesses ownerships, bank accounts, educational records, marriage documentation, etc, etc, was easy to reconstruct and prove. Your argument is based on nothing more than fantasy and wishful thinking! Compensatory class action law suits are based on tangible documentation or legal concept. YOU HAVE NONE!

So it's clear that your views on reparations to African-Americans is based on bs emotions like subjective nonsense……

I don’t think so. Sorry Elmo, but it appears “your acerbic personal attacks and innuendo are more emotional than mine. Nice try……

….like things that you perceive to be too "divisive" to consider/perform when ending Segregation was,

“…..like things you perceive to be too divisive to consider/perform when Segregation was,…”???!!! Ok, it’s my turn -this must be the writing of a post crack smoking episode….

…..no doubt, "divisive" but you have ready-lip service that rationalizes that...

Uhhhhh…..Yeah….and you need to have that dyslexia checked out. Sorry bro, but it’s really showing….HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!
×
×
×
×