Skip to main content

Reply to "A white dudes take on repatriations"

quote:
all the things you mentioned were not unrealistic, divisive or nonsensical


Damn... you're determine to EXPOSE yourself...

I mean, seriously...

quote:
I have no idea how you can compare a nefarious concept like reparations to segregation.


When reparations is the concept/term you apply the adjective ("nefarious") to; nefarious meaning "flagrantly wicked or impious: evil." And then you tried to overcompensate for your obvious exposure by placing this is caps:

IT CLEARY VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF BLACK AMERICANS

... like you were making some kind of point other than you playing lip service to egalitarianism. You say:

quote:
The constitution does not support reparations.


But point to nothing in the Constitution that prohibits it and, of course, you say nothing to the kinds of reparations that the U.S. government has paid to "selected groups."

http://library.thinkquest.org/...math/reparations.htm
http://articles.latimes.com/20...ation/na-goldtrain21


And those, my constitutionally and competence CHALLENGED friend, are FACTS... Facts, you know, are facts. So it's clear that your views on reparations to African-Americans is based on bs emotions like subjective nonsense like things that you perceive to be too "divisive" to consider/perform when ending Segregation was, no doubt, "divisive" but you have ready-lip service that rationalizes that...
×
×
×
×