No Props to Jason Whitlock for this bs article (re: Serena Williams)

 
July 8, 2009 11:17 PM

quote:

In addition to talking about Roger Federer and his record-breaking 15th Grand Slam title, we should also be celebrating Serena Williams and her assault on Margaret Court's record.

The problem is, even after knocking off her sister in Saturday's Wimbledon singles final, Serena isn't anywhere close to Court's 24 Grand Slam singles titles.

At age 27 — the same age as Federer — Serena owns just half as many major titles (11) as Steffi Graf, the greatest women's player of all time. That's a terrible shame.

With a reduction in glut, a little less butt and a smidgen more guts, Serena Williams would easily be as big as Michael Jackson, dwarf Tiger Woods and take a run at Rosa Parks.

You can call me unfair. You can even scream that I'm sexist.

But there's an inescapable truth about Serena Williams: She's an underachiever.

And all the people making excuses for Serena and rationalizing her failure to totally dominate women's tennis are the very people uninterested in seeing women rise to a level of equality with men.

Serena Williams has all the ingredients to be Michael Jordan, Jim Brown and Muhammad Ali rolled into one made-for-TV package. She is quite possibly the most gifted female athlete in our lifetime.

Unfortunately for us, she lacks the courage to fulfill her destiny.

She'd rather eat, half-ass her way through non-major tournaments and complain she's not getting the respect her 11-major-championships résumé demands.


She complains about being ranked No. 2 in the world when she's not bitching on Twitter or her blog about new rules that forbid Wimbledon players from eating in the locker room.

Seriously, how else can Serena fill out her size 16 shorts without grazing at her stall between matches?

I know, you think I'm a hypocrite. No, I'm not. Sports writers are supposed to be plump and lazy. I'm fulfilling my destiny.

And you probably think I don't like Serena. You're wrong. I love her. She's the main reason I watch tennis. She's fascinating. Her power and skill are breathtaking. And when she's in shape, she's every bit as sexy as Beyonce.

I know, sex appeal isn't supposed to matter in sports. That's such a load of (spit). Television sells sex appeal in men's sports, too. You think being tall, dark and handsome didn't significantly enhance Jordan's appeal? You think Joe Namath, Joe Montana and Tom Brady haven't been sold as sex symbols?

Appearance matters in televised sports. The whining last week about Wimbledon's admission that attractiveness plays a role in determining who plays on Centre Court struck me as disingenuous, politically correct bull crap.

During this year's Wimbledon, Serena and Safina played Court 2 while hot, lesser stars battled on Centre Court. Safina can blame genetics for her fate. Serena only has herself to blame. God gave Serena everything, including drop-dead looks.

She's chosen to smother some of it in an unsightly layer of thick, muscled blubber, a byproduct of her unwillingness to commit to a training regimen and diet that would have her at the top of her game year-round.


Serena simply isn't obsessed with tennis perfection. She seems to play the game solely because she's good at it. Not because she has a burning desire to be the best there ever was. That is her right.

And it's my right to rip her for choosing to be a celebrity tennis player rather than a single-minded tennis assassin.

If she chose the latter, it would be front-page news every time she lost a tournament. She'd complete the Serena Slam — winning all four majors — every other year. She'd be the most popular and powerful female athlete of all time.

Tiger Woods couldn't touch her. Roger Federer would be reduced to shagging her balls. LeBron James and Kobe Bryant would be the little kids in the Nike commercial bragging that they lived downstairs from Serena and Venus Williams.

Think about it. At 5-foot-9, 145 pounds, Serena would be unstoppable on the court, on the cover of every magazine still in circulation and downloaded on the Internet three times more often than Anna Kournikova.

Instead, Serena is arguably pushing 175 pounds, content playing hard only in the major tournaments, happy to be photographed on dates with pro athletes and proud to serve as a role model for women with oversized back packs.

BBWs — Big Booty Women — do not write me angry e-mails. I'm only knocking Serena's back pack because it's preventing her from reaching her full potential as an athletic icon.
I am not fundamentally opposed to junk in the trunk, although my preference is a stuffed onion over an oozing pumpkin.

(A stuffed onion is a booty so round and tight that it brings tears to your eyes).

I'm sorry. I digress.

Serena has limitless potential. Tennis is the platform that could open doors for her and other women. Her parents raised her to speak her mind. She's bright.

She could break the glass ceiling for female athletes and become the transcendent superstar who connects globally. She could join Oprah and Madonna. Serena could be an impossible-to-ignore advocate for any position she supported.

Right now I'd put on Serena on par with Paris Hilton. I know that's harsh. Serena's accomplishments are far more substantive than Hilton's. But Paris Hilton doesn't have one discernible skill (that I can publish in this column without earning it an R rating). Hilton's monumental overachievement is her accomplishment of becoming a celebrity.

Serena's greatest feat might be avoiding establishing herself as the greatest tennis player of all time.

http://msn.foxsports.com/tenni...he-best-ever,-but-...
 
____________________________________________ http://nquest2xl.wordpress.com/
 
 
View Printer Friendly Format
 
July 8, 2009 11:24 PM

First Bill O'Reilly ... Now Whitlock ... What's with all these pseudo-pundits vying for celebrity, or should I say relevance, at the expense of Black folk?
 
 
 
Like Like (0 likes)
PermalinkView Printer Friendly Format
A1
 
July 9, 2009 12:21 AM

I can understand critiquing her focus/dedication/committment or whatever. That seems legitimate for a sports writer to do, but i'm not understanding why the size of her buttocks (which won't change with weight loss) is repeatedly mentioned in this article. Then the dude goes on to express his personal preferences for the aesthetics of a woman's behind...

in an article about an athlete?

he came across as a PERV with a strong european body image fixation....

not a sports writer.

Has he ever written about the size and dimension of Shaq's buttocks? Yao Ming's butt dimensions?
 
 
 
Like Like (0 likes)
PermalinkView Printer Friendly Format
 
July 9, 2009 8:19 AM

quote:
know, you think I'm a hypocrite. No, I'm not. Sports writers are supposed to be plump and lazy. I'm fulfilling my destiny.


This lame ass line summed up the entire article for me. He is full of sh*t.
 
 
 
Like Like (0 likes)
PermalinkView Printer Friendly Format
Guest
 
July 9, 2009 10:20 AM

quote:
Originally posted by ocatchings:
quote:
know, you think I'm a hypocrite. No, I'm not. Sports writers are supposed to be plump and lazy. I'm fulfilling my destiny.


This lame ass line summed up the entire article for me. He is full of sh*t.


I agree with all of ya'll so far.

This is one punk-assed nigga.
 
 
 
Like Like (0 likes)
PermalinkView Printer Friendly Format
 
July 9, 2009 10:26 AM

He is the reason I don't use Fox Sports anymore.

After ESPN canned him for going after co-worker (and Black man) Scoop Jackson in articles, he ended up in the media outlet that loves Uncle Ruckus style brothers.

Stop giving Uncle Ruckus any pub.
 
 
 
Like Like (0 likes)
PermalinkView Printer Friendly Format
A1
 
July 9, 2009 10:47 AM

Welp, when i read the Steve McNair article, i thought it was simply a reaction to the tragedy of four boys losing their father over drawls, but i see now, the dude has a pattern of harsh criticism for black professional athletes, even when they're at the top of their game and winning wimbledon...

I don't think self-hatred is too harsh a word here.
 
 
 
Like Like (0 likes)
PermalinkView Printer Friendly Format
 
July 9, 2009 11:10 AM

quote:
Originally posted by negrospiritual:
Welp, when i read the Steve McNair article, i thought it was simply a reaction to the tragedy of four boys losing their father over drawls, but i see now, the dude has a pattern of harsh criticism for black professional athletes, even when they're at the top of their game and winning wimbledon...

I don't think self-hatred is too harsh a word here.



I agree NS..

But his being a self hater (and I share your assessment lol) doesn't make the accurate parts of his criticism any less true.. including that of Serena...

As an athlete her physical fitness will be called into question and open to criticism.. as people do boxers, swimmers, dancers or track stars when they gain a few pounds.. if they are in a sport/field where weight gain appears to play a role in their performance..

This of course is separate from his (Whitlock's) overfixation on Serena's arse... (He sounds like he was taking a swig of alkie hawl when he wrote this! lol) but not all of his points should be dismissed.. just his manner of speaking..
On another note:

From the limited information we have unfortunately Steve McNair died embroiled in a scandal for which he left himself tainted and open to criticism ...

I see all of these deaths and the subsequent commentary/ opinions they have generated and think of MJ... and just think American idols really should not be heavily represented in the entertainment/sports field... I think Obama has broken that barrier.. but honestly I would like to see more critical analysis where one can see past the persona of the person presenting their opinion... or our own love for a person and have a platform accepting of more complex analysis where we can discuss the legacy of the person's faults as well as their positives.. I've seen too many discussions that are heavily extreme..

1. If you love the person- ANY criticism is seen as hatred... even where criticism might be warranted..

2. If you dislike the person- ANY respect for the honor of their legacy, respect for their humanity in death etc.. will be seen as blind love...


I find that the person's we find extraordinary are extraordinary in their complexities as well..... presenting actions/decisions that call forth both derision and inspiration.. Human beings are rarely worth only one or the other...

Really, the net is full of this type of thing.. :-/
 
 
 
Like Like (0 likes)
PermalinkView Printer Friendly Format
 
July 9, 2009 11:14 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Khalliqa:
quote:
Originally posted by negrospiritual:
Welp, when i read the Steve McNair article, i thought it was simply a reaction to the tragedy of four boys losing their father over drawls, but i see now, the dude has a pattern of harsh criticism for black professional athletes, even when they're at the top of their game and winning wimbledon...

I don't think self-hatred is too harsh a word here.



I agree NS..

But his being a self hater (and I share your assessment lol) doesn't make the accurate parts of his criticism any less true.. including that of Serena...

As an athlete her physical fitness will be called into question and open to criticism.. as people do boxers, swimmers, dancers or track stars when they gain a few pounds.. if they are in a sport/field where weight gain appears to play a role in their performance..

This of course is separate from his (Whitlock's) overfixation on Serena's arse... (He sounds like he was taking a swig of alkie hawl when he wrote this! lol) but not all of his points should be dismissed.. just his manner of speaking..
On another note:

From the limited information we have unfortunately Steve McNair died embroiled in a scandal for which he left himself tainted and open to criticism ...

I see all of these deaths and the subsequent commentary/ opinions they have generated and think of MJ... and just think American idols really should not be heavily represented in the entertainment/sports field... I think Obama has broken that barrier.. but honestly I would like to see more critical analysis where one can see past the persona of the person presenting their opinion... or our own love for a person and have a platform accepting of more complex analysis where we can discuss the legacy of the person's faults as well as their positives.. I've seen too many discussions that are heavily extreme..

1. If you love the person- ANY criticism is seen as hatred... even where criticism might be warranted..

2. If you dislike the person- ANY respect for the honor of their legacy, respect for their humanity in death etc.. will be seen as blind love...


I find that the person's we find extraordinary are extraordinary in their complexities as well presenting actions/decisions that call forth both derision and inspiration.. Human beings are rarely worth only one or the other...
Really, the net is full of this type of thing.. :-/


rock

 
 
 
Like Like (0 likes)
PermalinkView Printer Friendly Format
 
July 9, 2009 11:26 AM

Whitlock is no tennis expert or athletic performance expert. As of June 2009, the WTA has Serena's weight listed at 150 pounds, so unless he got her to step on a scale in the last two weeks, he is just spouting off. Give credence to his performance theories when he coaches an athlete to her level of success.

There is a time and way to say everything - he clearly needs a tact coach.

Stop giving Uncle Ruckus pub.
 
 
 
Like Like (0 likes)
PermalinkView Printer Friendly Format
A1
 
July 9, 2009 12:00 PM

quote:
Originally posted by ocatchings:
quote:
know, you think I'm a hypocrite. No, I'm not. Sports writers are supposed to be plump and lazy. I'm fulfilling my destiny.


This lame ass line summed up the entire article for me. He is full of sh*t.


yeah Whitlock is so full of crap, he should be able to get an endorsement deal with EX-LAX.
 
 
 
Like Like (0 likes)
PermalinkView Printer Friendly Format
Guest
 
July 9, 2009 12:04 PM

quote:
Originally posted by ddouble:
Whitlock is no tennis expert or athletic performance expert. As of June 2009, the WTA has Serena's weight listed at 150 pounds, so unless he got her to step on a scale in the last two weeks, he is just spouting off. Give credence to his performance theories when he coaches an athlete to her level of success.

There is a time and way to say everything - he clearly needs a tact coach.

Stop giving Uncle Ruckus pub.


EXACTLY.
 
 
 
Like Like (0 likes)
PermalinkView Printer Friendly Format
 
Post Reply